`Pattern` is intended to pilot some changes I would like to apply to all our sum types:
- The alternatives are expressed as derived classes rather than members of a `std::variant`.
- The alternatives are classes in the [style guide sense](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Structs_vs._Classes), meaning they can have invariants, but can't have public data members.
- Creating an object is expressed using a constructor rather than a factory function.
- Accessing an alternative is expressed as a cast (using LLVM's RTTI system) rather than `std::get` or a `Get` method.
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
This is intended to:
- Standardize use of line_num (and highlight where no line_num is available).
- Standardize indications of runtime/compilation errors.
- Make it incrementally easier to write new errors.
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
- Automatically mark issues/PRs `inactive` after 90 days without comments
- Archive PRs (only) after 14 more days
- Adding "long term" for issues which can't be resolved in a few months, but shouldn't be marked `inactive`.
Trying to simplify the process of updating golden output, and ensuring that we aren't missing any tests. With this script, it should be roughly "Add the .carbon file, then run tests.py --update_all"
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Expand the description of the structure of a proposal PR. Clarify that
the full PR is the proposal, not only the P-numbered document. Start a
design style guide and use it to describe which parts of a proposal
should not end up in the design.
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
I was looking for something like this, I think it's a straightforward simplification for code. Internally, it handles skipping the separator on the first print.
See the bottom of: https://llvm.org/doxygen/StringExtras_8h_source.html
Require braces, never optional, particularly in control flow like `if`/`else`.
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
- Switch code to llvm::raw_ostream as part of standardizing output forms.
- Preferring llvm::raw_ostream over std::ostream because other tooling code should be expected to rely on llvm more closely, and an overall preference towards library consistency.
- There are a couple spots in syntax/ that still use std streams, but I'd prefer to take a separate PR to see how best to address those.
- std::boolalpha doesn't work with llvm, so I've implemented equivalent in a couple places (not enough that it felt like worth making a helper function).
- Implement Print(ostream) as consistently as we can, as an instance member.
- This facilitates the use of the common/ostream.h template to provide operators.
- Preferring this approach so that Print is easily accessible via gdb, per suggestion on #executable-semantics.
- Switch code currently calling `type->Print(ostream)` to instead do `ostream << *type`.
- Remove the unused `PrintTypeEnv`, nothing used it and the declaration didn't match the definition.
This adds a test for invalid characters (that would've failed before, because the printed char isn't escaped). Not sure if there's a good way to test the PrintDiagnostic code, as it appears to occur on bison parser errors, which I'm just not sure how to trigger.
- Move Heap and Frame/Scope to their own headers.
- Move some functions to more appropriate headers (e.g. CopyValue -> value.h).
- Define a separate Bazel rule for each header/cpp pair.
- Modify PrintValue to not print the frames of a ContinuationValue. This was necessary to break a dependency cycle between PrintValue, PrintFrame, and Action::Print.
Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
Note this makes some structural choices that I'm not sure how popular they'll be... Most notably, I could remove `DeclarationKind` because I'm using `std::visit` and `Declaration::Visitor` in reality. I could go to `switch(tag())` instead, but I'm wondering if this approach will be well received for the separation of ownership. Alternatively, I could move `Declaration` around so that it actually implements the things like `TopLevel` -- I did feel weird with the old structure of typecheck.cpp implementing members of declaration.h, though.
This replaces GetAstMatcher with AddMatcher because cxxForRangeStmt is a StatementMatcher. addMatcher has multiple definitions (https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1ast__matchers_1_1MatchFinder.html) and so this approach allows using the right addMatcher without writing per-call overloads.
To handle the `var`, I'm considering something like moving VarDecl logic into a VarMatcherBase so that I can just use CXXForRangeStmt's getLoopVariable. The problem is a for-range statement has multiple VarDecls, and getLoopVariable may be the easiest way to identify the real one.
We will eventually need the ability to materialize temporaries eventually, but we don't really seem to need it yet, and when we do, I think we should do it in a way that gives uniform treatment to temporaries and local variables.
Also:
- Switch data members, and associated parameters and return types to be values/references rather than pointers, where applicable.
- Move Expression's TagVisitor to anonymous namespace, to avoid name collision.
- Switch to trailing return syntax (per style guide).
Geoff RomerandJon Meow
Jeremy G. Siek
josh11b