Files
carbon-lang/toolchain/check/testdata/function/declaration/fail_modifiers.carbon
T
Geoff RomerandDana Jansens e67b6db910 Give files shorthand names in textual SemIR (#8104)
Shorthand names are intended to be used in the textual format of
references to instructions in another IR (which can't happen now, but
will be possible in a forthcoming PR). The shorthand name uses the file
name (minus the `.carbon` suffix) as a base, and if that base name is
ambiguous within the compilation, it is given a numerical suffix `.N`,
just like other textual IR names. Shorthand names are prefixed with `$`
in the textual format, to distinguish them from inst and scope names.

For example, a file `foo/bar.carbon` has the shorthand name `$bar`, and
an instruction `@baz.%qux` in that file can be referenced from another
file as `$bar.@baz.%qux`.

This PR adds `toolchain/check/testdata/basics/file_name.carbon` to test
this behavior. All other test changes are just applying this change to
the existing textual SemIR dumps.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
2026-11-12 23:34:32 +00:00

184 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext

// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
// INCLUDE-FILE: toolchain/testing/testdata/min_prelude/none.carbon
// TODO: Add ranges and switch to "--dump-sem-ir-ranges=only".
// EXTRA-ARGS: --dump-sem-ir-ranges=if-present
//
// AUTOUPDATE
// TIP: To test this file alone, run:
// TIP: bazel test //toolchain/testing:file_test --test_arg=--file_tests=toolchain/check/testdata/function/declaration/fail_modifiers.carbon
// TIP: To dump output, run:
// TIP: bazel run //toolchain/testing:file_test -- --dump_output --file_tests=toolchain/check/testdata/function/declaration/fail_modifiers.carbon
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+15]]:9
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ default protected fn WrongOrder();
// CHECK:STDERR: · ───┬─── ━━━━┳━━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┗━━┫ error: `protected` must appear before `default`
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┃ [ModifierMustAppearBefore]
// CHECK:STDERR: · ╰─────────────┤ `default` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:1
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ default protected fn WrongOrder();
// CHECK:STDERR: · ━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┗━━┫ error: `default` not allowed; requires interface scope
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┃ [ModifierRequiresInterface]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
default protected fn WrongOrder();
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+14]]:9
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ virtual virtual fn DuplicateVirtual() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ───┬─── ━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┗━━┫ error: `virtual` repeated on declaration [ModifierRepeated]
// CHECK:STDERR: · ╰────────────┤ `virtual` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:1
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ virtual virtual fn DuplicateVirtual() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┗━━┫ error: `virtual` not allowed; requires class scope
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┃ [ModifierRequiresClass]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
virtual virtual fn DuplicateVirtual() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+8]]:9
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ private protected fn TwoAccess();
// CHECK:STDERR: · ───┬─── ━━━━┳━━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┗━━┫ error: `protected` not allowed on declaration with `private`
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┃ [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
// CHECK:STDERR: · ╰─────────────┤ `private` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
private protected fn TwoAccess();
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+15]]:10
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ abstract virtual fn ModifiersConflict() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ────┬─── ━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┗━━┫ error: `virtual` not allowed on declaration with `abstract`
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┃ [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
// CHECK:STDERR: · ╰────────────┤ `abstract` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:1
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ abstract virtual fn ModifiersConflict() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ━━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┗━━┫ error: `abstract` not allowed; requires class scope
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┃ [ModifierRequiresClass]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
abstract virtual fn ModifiersConflict() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:1
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ base fn InvalidModifier();
// CHECK:STDERR: · ━━┳━
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┗━━┫ error: `base` not allowed on `fn` declaration
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┃ [ModifierNotAllowedOnDeclaration]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
base fn InvalidModifier();
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+23]]:9
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ───┬─── ━━┳━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┗━━┫ error: `final` not allowed on declaration with `default`
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┃ [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
// CHECK:STDERR: · ╰───────────┤ `default` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+15]]:15
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ───┬─── ━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┗━━┫ error: `virtual` not allowed on declaration with `default`
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┃ [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
// CHECK:STDERR: · ╰──────────────────┤ `default` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:1
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┗━━┫ error: `default` not allowed; requires interface scope
// CHECK:STDERR: · ┃ [ModifierRequiresInterface]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: ╭─┤ fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+8]]:8
// CHECK:STDERR: -> │ extern private fn ExternOrderAndConflict() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: · ───┬── ━━━┳━━━
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┗━━┫ error: `private` must appear before `extern`
// CHECK:STDERR: · │ ┃ [ModifierMustAppearBefore]
// CHECK:STDERR: · ╰───────────┤ `extern` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
// CHECK:STDERR: ╰────
// CHECK:STDERR:
extern private fn ExternOrderAndConflict() {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: --- fail_modifiers.carbon = $fail_modifiers
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: constants {
// CHECK:STDOUT: type: type = facet_type <type> [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder.type: type = fn_type @WrongOrder [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder: %WrongOrder.type = struct_value () [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %DuplicateVirtual.type: type = fn_type @DuplicateVirtual [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %DuplicateVirtual: %DuplicateVirtual.type = struct_value () [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %TwoAccess.type: type = fn_type @TwoAccess [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %TwoAccess: %TwoAccess.type = struct_value () [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict.type: type = fn_type @ModifiersConflict [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict: %ModifiersConflict.type = struct_value () [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %InvalidModifier.type: type = fn_type @InvalidModifier [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %InvalidModifier: %InvalidModifier.type = struct_value () [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict2.type: type = fn_type @ModifiersConflict2 [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict2: %ModifiersConflict2.type = struct_value () [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ExternOrderAndConflict.type: type = fn_type @ExternOrderAndConflict [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ExternOrderAndConflict: %ExternOrderAndConflict.type = struct_value () [concrete]
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: file {
// CHECK:STDOUT: package: <namespace> = namespace [concrete] {
// CHECK:STDOUT: .WrongOrder = %WrongOrder.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .DuplicateVirtual = %DuplicateVirtual.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .TwoAccess [private] = %TwoAccess.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .ModifiersConflict = %ModifiersConflict.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .InvalidModifier = %InvalidModifier.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .ModifiersConflict2 = %ModifiersConflict2.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .ExternOrderAndConflict = %ExternOrderAndConflict.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder.decl: %WrongOrder.type = fn_decl @WrongOrder [concrete = constants.%WrongOrder] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %DuplicateVirtual.decl: %DuplicateVirtual.type = fn_decl @DuplicateVirtual [concrete = constants.%DuplicateVirtual] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %TwoAccess.decl: %TwoAccess.type = fn_decl @TwoAccess [concrete = constants.%TwoAccess] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict.decl: %ModifiersConflict.type = fn_decl @ModifiersConflict [concrete = constants.%ModifiersConflict] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %InvalidModifier.decl: %InvalidModifier.type = fn_decl @InvalidModifier [concrete = constants.%InvalidModifier] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict2.decl: %ModifiersConflict2.type = fn_decl @ModifiersConflict2 [concrete = constants.%ModifiersConflict2] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ExternOrderAndConflict.decl: %ExternOrderAndConflict.type = fn_decl @ExternOrderAndConflict [concrete = constants.%ExternOrderAndConflict] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @WrongOrder();
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @DuplicateVirtual() {
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @TwoAccess();
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @ModifiersConflict() {
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @InvalidModifier();
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @ModifiersConflict2() {
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: extern fn @ExternOrderAndConflict() {
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT: