Files
carbon-lang/toolchain/check/cpp/access.cpp
T
Richard Smith c33fb9fc48 Support signature mismatch between virtual fn and override fn. (#7198)
For now, hide `override fn`s from name lookup, so that the base class
version is always used, as the derived-class version does not have its
own vptr entry and so would not do the right thing if a further-derived
class adds a new override. This is implemented via a new access kind of
`Hidden`.

When checking the overriding function, pass in the expected `Self` type
and check the `self` parameter against that; the signature that we
generate for the thunk in the derived class is the base class signature
with the `self` parameter's type changed to the derived class.

When we generate a thunk for a virtual function, the thunk is assigned a
`virtual_index`, and the virtual function itself is not. When the thunk
makes a direct call to the virtual function, recognize this situation by
checking for a `virtual_index`, and perform a non-virtual call if there
isn't one.

Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
2026-05-13 17:40:45 +00:00

60 lines
2.3 KiB
C++

// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
#include "toolchain/check/cpp/access.h"
namespace Carbon::Check {
static auto CalculateEffectiveAccess(clang::DeclAccessPair access_pair)
-> clang::AccessSpecifier {
// Note that we use `.getAccess()` here, not `->getAccess()`, which is
// equivalent to `.getDecl()->getAccess()`, because we want to consider the
// lookup access and not the lexical access.
switch (access_pair.getAccess()) {
// Lookup access takes precedence.
case clang::AS_public:
case clang::AS_protected:
case clang::AS_private:
return access_pair.getAccess();
case clang::AS_none:
// No access specified meaning depends on the declaration. For non class
// members, it means there's no access associated with this function so we
// treat it as public. For class members it means we lost access along the
// inheritance path, and the difference between `none` and `private` only
// matters when the access check is performed within a friend or member of
// the naming class. Because the naming class is a C++ class, and we don't
// yet have a mechanism for a C++ class to befriend a Carbon class, we can
// safely map `none` to `private` for now.
return access_pair->isCXXClassMember() ? clang::AS_private
: clang::AS_public;
}
}
auto MapCppAccess(clang::DeclAccessPair access_pair) -> SemIR::AccessKind {
switch (CalculateEffectiveAccess(access_pair)) {
case clang::AS_public:
return SemIR::AccessKind::Public;
case clang::AS_protected:
return SemIR::AccessKind::Protected;
case clang::AS_private:
return SemIR::AccessKind::Private;
case clang::AS_none:
CARBON_FATAL("Couldn't convert access");
}
}
auto MapToCppAccess(SemIR::AccessKind access) -> clang::AccessSpecifier {
switch (access) {
case SemIR::AccessKind::Public:
return clang::AS_public;
case SemIR::AccessKind::Protected:
return clang::AS_protected;
case SemIR::AccessKind::Private:
case SemIR::AccessKind::Hidden:
return clang::AS_private;
}
}
} // namespace Carbon::Check