mirror of
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git
synced 2026-10-01 22:02:45 +01:00
David BlaikieandJon Ross-Perkins
e6c1f0630a
This removes some churn when adding new diagnostic cases to test files (where previous to this change the newly added newline would cause the previous diagnostic CHECKs to be updated including changes to the line number because the CHECK for the blank line meant an extra line between CHECK and source line). A few alternatives discussed here: https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1329573358475673723 --------- Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
158 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
158 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
|
|
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
// AUTOUPDATE
|
|
// TIP: To test this file alone, run:
|
|
// TIP: bazel test //toolchain/testing:file_test --test_arg=--file_tests=toolchain/check/testdata/function/declaration/no_prelude/fail_modifiers.carbon
|
|
// TIP: To dump output, run:
|
|
// TIP: bazel run //toolchain/testing:file_test -- --dump_output --file_tests=toolchain/check/testdata/function/declaration/no_prelude/fail_modifiers.carbon
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+11]]:9: error: `protected` must appear before `default` [ModifierMustAppearBefore]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default protected fn WrongOrder();
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+8]]:1: note: `default` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default protected fn WrongOrder();
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: error: `default` not allowed; requires interface scope [ModifierRequiresInterface]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default protected fn WrongOrder();
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
default protected fn WrongOrder();
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+11]]:9: error: `virtual` repeated on declaration [ModifierRepeated]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: virtual virtual fn DuplicateVirtual() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+8]]:1: note: `virtual` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: virtual virtual fn DuplicateVirtual() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: error: `virtual` not allowed; requires class scope [ModifierRequiresClass]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: virtual virtual fn DuplicateVirtual() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
virtual virtual fn DuplicateVirtual() {}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:9: error: `protected` not allowed on declaration with `private` [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: private protected fn TwoAccess();
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: note: `private` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: private protected fn TwoAccess();
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
private protected fn TwoAccess();
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+11]]:10: error: `virtual` not allowed on declaration with `abstract` [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: abstract virtual fn ModifiersConflict() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+8]]:1: note: `abstract` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: abstract virtual fn ModifiersConflict() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: error: `abstract` not allowed; requires class scope [ModifierRequiresClass]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: abstract virtual fn ModifiersConflict() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
abstract virtual fn ModifiersConflict() {}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: error: `base` not allowed on `fn` declaration [ModifierNotAllowedOnDeclaration]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: base fn InvalidModifier();
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
base fn InvalidModifier();
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+18]]:9: error: `final` not allowed on declaration with `default` [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+15]]:1: note: `default` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+11]]:15: error: `virtual` not allowed on declaration with `default` [ModifierNotAllowedWith]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+8]]:1: note: `default` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: error: `default` not allowed; requires interface scope [ModifierRequiresInterface]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
default final virtual fn ModifiersConflict2() {}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:8: error: `private` must appear before `extern` [ModifierMustAppearBefore]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: extern private fn ExternOrderAndConflict() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: note: `extern` previously appeared here [ModifierPrevious]
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: extern private fn ExternOrderAndConflict() {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~
|
|
// CHECK:STDERR:
|
|
extern private fn ExternOrderAndConflict() {}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: --- fail_modifiers.carbon
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: constants {
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder.type: type = fn_type @WrongOrder [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder: %WrongOrder.type = struct_value () [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %DuplicateVirtual.type: type = fn_type @DuplicateVirtual [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %DuplicateVirtual: %DuplicateVirtual.type = struct_value () [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %TwoAccess.type: type = fn_type @TwoAccess [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %TwoAccess: %TwoAccess.type = struct_value () [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict.type: type = fn_type @ModifiersConflict [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict: %ModifiersConflict.type = struct_value () [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %InvalidModifier.type: type = fn_type @InvalidModifier [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %InvalidModifier: %InvalidModifier.type = struct_value () [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict2.type: type = fn_type @ModifiersConflict2 [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict2: %ModifiersConflict2.type = struct_value () [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ExternOrderAndConflict.type: type = fn_type @ExternOrderAndConflict [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ExternOrderAndConflict: %ExternOrderAndConflict.type = struct_value () [template]
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: file {
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: package: <namespace> = namespace [template] {
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: .WrongOrder = %WrongOrder.decl
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: .DuplicateVirtual = %DuplicateVirtual.decl
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: .TwoAccess [private] = %TwoAccess.decl
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: .ModifiersConflict = %ModifiersConflict.decl
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: .InvalidModifier = %InvalidModifier.decl
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: .ModifiersConflict2 = %ModifiersConflict2.decl
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: .ExternOrderAndConflict = %ExternOrderAndConflict.decl
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder.decl: %WrongOrder.type = fn_decl @WrongOrder [template = constants.%WrongOrder] {} {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %DuplicateVirtual.decl: %DuplicateVirtual.type = fn_decl @DuplicateVirtual [template = constants.%DuplicateVirtual] {} {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %TwoAccess.decl: %TwoAccess.type = fn_decl @TwoAccess [template = constants.%TwoAccess] {} {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict.decl: %ModifiersConflict.type = fn_decl @ModifiersConflict [template = constants.%ModifiersConflict] {} {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %InvalidModifier.decl: %InvalidModifier.type = fn_decl @InvalidModifier [template = constants.%InvalidModifier] {} {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ModifiersConflict2.decl: %ModifiersConflict2.type = fn_decl @ModifiersConflict2 [template = constants.%ModifiersConflict2] {} {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: %ExternOrderAndConflict.decl: %ExternOrderAndConflict.type = fn_decl @ExternOrderAndConflict [template = constants.%ExternOrderAndConflict] {} {}
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @WrongOrder();
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @DuplicateVirtual() {
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @TwoAccess();
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @ModifiersConflict() {
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @InvalidModifier();
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: fn @ModifiersConflict2() {
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: extern fn @ExternOrderAndConflict() {
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
|
|
// CHECK:STDOUT:
|