This leaves a single state for each in the expr loop. I was trying to
think through ways to have per-token states, but they felt sort of
bulky.
Note this is more verbose: but I think the long-term is going to be that
when we start wanting to add handlers, we're going to need to switch to
different names based on the token found. As a consequence, the parse
state logic will end up diverging a little, and we'll just want to align
towards boilerplate handlers.
Short-term, this opens up a path for saying that each parse node
corresponds to precisely one token in success states, and separates out
what were becoming big handler functions in check.
This is also doing the parse node split, allowing lower reliance in
formatter on the tokenized buffer (something that I may be touching more
due to import handling).
(Split out of #3410)
Consistently use `ParenExpr` solely for parenthesized single
expressions, and use more syntax-oriented terminology for states and
nodes that might represent either a `ParenExpr` or a tuple literal.
This is supporting a direction that all parse nodes should correspond to
a single token, allowing for reduced tokenized buffer access during
checking (it's still necessary for diagnostics, and some literals).
One of the justifications for a unified parse node was implementation
LOC: note this is slightly smaller, using macros to reduce some
duplication. While this does add more switching in HandleDeclScopeLoop,
that's offset by less explicit switching in the check handlers. Also, I
think the duplication in HandleDeclScopeLoop can be reduced by shifting
the flow there, which I'll do in a separate PR.
This creates a namespace for `package` scope.
It looks like names of class_decls in namespaces lead to an unexpected
instref. This is already true, as best as I can tell. I'm not sure if
there's a preferred approach to address that, so I've left a TODO for
now.
For now, we require the same introducer to be used each time a class is
declared, but see #3384.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Implement toolchain support for `returned var` and `return var`.
- Modeled `returned` in the parse tree as a `ReturnedSpecifier`
appearing after the `VariableIntroducer`.
- Modeled `return var` in the parse tree as a `ReturnVarSpecifier`
appearing after the `ReturnStatementStart`.
- Factored out the implementation of `return` statement and `returned
var` handling in check into a new `return.{h,cpp}`. The parse nodes
themselves are still handled in `handle_*.cpp`. This allows easy code
reuse between `return` and `returned var`.
Add a `NameId` that is effectively just a wrapper around a `StringId`,
with
some additional predefined values for names that don't correspond to
strings, such as the name of `self` or the function's return slot.
Following up on discussion yesterday regarding this split.
Note, I'm expecting #3341 to do IdentifierId -> NameId in SemIR. It
might be worth adding NameId creation directly to StringStore if you're
content with this setup though.
This replaces the use of `VarStorage` in this case.
Add an `UnboundFieldType` type as the type of a field, in cases where
it's referenced without an accompanying object.
Add a `BindName` node to describe the name binding performed for both
variables and fields so that we can handle them more uniformly.
This updates lexing to use the data. I'll do checking separately, just
to split changes.
Note the ValueStore structure is also set up such that SemIR::File can
use it for other fields.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
A `let` declaration is represented by a `bind_name` node in SemIR:
```carbon-semir
%b: i32 = bind_name "b", %a
```
Because `Check` encounters the pattern before it sees the value, we
first create the `bind_name` node with an unset value and don't add it
to the block. Then, once we've seen and converted the initializer, we
update the `bind_name` to have the value and add it to the current
block, after the initializer code.
Continuing with #3070. Just a dir and file rename (mostly removing
prefixes, although for parse_tree_fuzzer and parse_tree_file_test I'm
dropping "tree" instead of "parse"). Everything in the parse dir should
be marked as a move.
Continuing along with #3070. Note this is just a file rename, with BUILD
edits; every file previously in semantics/ should show as moved (except
maybe BUILDs, which split).
Jon Ross-Perkins
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith
josh11b
