This builds on the series of changes to NodeKinds, aiming to simplify
the NodeKind implementation a little, also making it clearer that
there's a single associated token for each parse node (or, for
placeholders/invalid parses, not validated).
Note that prior to the relevant changes, there were nodes with multiple
tokens. This change is also locking in the approach of one token per
parse node, by refactoring macros to stop supporting multiple.
Note #3486 rewrites the macro behavior, and is already approved: so this
PR is only for the changed enforcement during error. Also, #3493 already
changed several things to allow any token while this PR was awaiting
review, but this still changes enforcement for `For` and `If`.
This was brought up on
[#toolchain](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1182066616456970251),
and I think this any-on-error approach gets at least some support. We
could try setting it to the introducer, but it's quite possible we want
it to be something like the token which led to the parse error, rather
than a static token. That leads to a conclusion that, most typically,
we'll expect arbitrary tokens when error conditions may lead to tokens
which aren't the expected token.
A couple related, recent `CARBON_IF_ERROR` crash fixes can be found in
#3404 and #3424. Something like #3404 would've been needed regardless
because `namespace` didn't have `CARBON_IF_ERROR` before, although I
might've missed the underlying issue with declarations because only
`namespace` had a relevant test (that is, if #3404 had added
`CARBON_ANY_TOKEN_ON_ERROR`, I wouldn't have had a crash in #3462).
#3424 would've been avoided with this change because there was a
`CARBON_IF_ERROR`, and it was just too restrictive.
This leaves a single state for each in the expr loop. I was trying to
think through ways to have per-token states, but they felt sort of
bulky.
Note this is more verbose: but I think the long-term is going to be that
when we start wanting to add handlers, we're going to need to switch to
different names based on the token found. As a consequence, the parse
state logic will end up diverging a little, and we'll just want to align
towards boilerplate handlers.
Short-term, this opens up a path for saying that each parse node
corresponds to precisely one token in success states, and separates out
what were becoming big handler functions in check.
Another incremental change to diagnostic formatting. I simply recurse
over all the tokens in the subtree of a parse node and construct a
`DiagnosticLocation` that covers all of the tokens.
I believe it's nicer for the user to be directed at the entire chunk of
source where the error is occurring rather then just pointing at the
bracketing/terminator tokens, but let me know if you all agree.
StructFieldUnknown was used previously for invalid parses. But we have
added other, more common ways of talking about those; so this is
removing the special-case.
Adds a `LazyImportRef` instruction. Versus `CrossRef`, this is intended
to represent an instruction which cannot be used directly, and must be
replaced when it comes up due to name lookup. The intent is to use this
to avoid recursive loading of imported IR instructions.
Note, under this model, when `ResolveIfLazyImportRef` is called, it
essentially needs to load both inst and type information to a sufficient
point where any further attempts would hit name lookup again. That will
probably be complex, and the current implementation is just touching the
surface of the issue. I was heading down this route because it would
mean we have a limited number of points that need to consider whether
they're going to talk about a `LazyImportRef`.
I'm considering whether `CrossRef` should be dropped in favor of more
specific `Builtin` special-casing, due to the divergence of desired
behaviors. This could mean dropping the `builtins` IR since it's not
looking useful right now.
Modify `NameScope` to track whether the scope is associated with a load
error. This is to handle cases where one or more imports failed, so we
do not want to issue warnings for related scopes.
The 0-size on `ValueStore` comes up due to the changes to `NameScope`,
which make it too large for the default handling. After discussion with
zygoloid, the thought was we might want to try reserving a roughly
correct value based on parse node counts, but the stack default wasn't
buying much.
Fixes a bug where the implicit import used the package name instead of
the invalid identifier.
Both of these flag flips require work to address. Their default changed
in bazel 7. Note adding these probably breaks versions of bazel older
than 6 -- but an update requirement seems okay in that case, since 6 is
about a year old now.
This is enough to support calling methods that take a `Base` or `Base*`
as their `self`. But name lookup doesn't look in the base class yet, so
base class methods aren't actually found.
This remains structurally valid although we don't use this operator or
have a design for it, this at least fixes a fuzzer-found crash.
---------
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This is also doing the parse node split, allowing lower reliance in
formatter on the tokenized buffer (something that I may be touching more
due to import handling).
Since we switched to using the scope stack instead of the decl state
stack to hold information about the containing definition in #3460 , we
can now pop the decl state at the end of the declaration instead of the
end of the body of the definition.
(Split out of #3410)
Consistently use `ParenExpr` solely for parenthesized single
expressions, and use more syntax-oriented terminology for states and
nodes that might represent either a `ParenExpr` or a tuple literal.
Building on #3463. The PushState+PopState to construct a state feels
worth cleanup. The rest is just kind of making it easier to do without
adding another PushState overload.
Building on #3462, trying to make the flow easier to see, also making a
little more use of macros for boilerplate modifier handling.
---------
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
BinaryOperatorAdd had been added early on as a proof-of-concept for
toolchain design for parsing -> checking flow. However, it doesn't
reflect the interface direction for operators, and now other portions of
the toolchain demonstrate the relevant logic. Instead, it's just a bit
of an outlier versus other instructions which have evolved over time.
Choosing to make the constructor explicit in the test, rather than
NOLINT, because it seems to better reflect how our code is usually
written (and may be more likely to trip an issue).
Per their documentation, the `llvm::Initialize*` functions are only
supposed to be called by the main program, not by a library like
toolchain/codegen. Fixes a hang due to a data race in multithreaded
autoupdate.
Add a utility class `Carbon::InitLLVM` to do the common LLVM
initialization shared by all Carbon tools, optionally including
initializing the LLVM targets. Because the LLVM targets add a lot of
binary size, only initialize them for binaries that opt in by depending
on a new target `//common:all_llvm_targets`.
Also fix `//explorer:file_test` and `//explorer:file_test.trace` to
share a binary rather than linking an identical binary twice.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
In theory because none are allowed. This is to improve consistency in
handle_decl_name_scope's modifier handling, removing the namespace
special-case.
I noticed there's a crash bug on `impl <declaration>` which I'll address
separately.
This builds on #3461.
This is supporting a direction that all parse nodes should correspond to
a single token, allowing for reduced tokenized buffer access during
checking (it's still necessary for diagnostics, and some literals).
One of the justifications for a unified parse node was implementation
LOC: note this is slightly smaller, using macros to reduce some
duplication. While this does add more switching in HandleDeclScopeLoop,
that's offset by less explicit switching in the check handlers. Also, I
think the duplication in HandleDeclScopeLoop can be reduced by shifting
the flow there, which I'll do in a separate PR.
Most of the calls to `StringifyType` already passed `true` for
`in_type_context`. Checking the rest, I found that every one of them was
already sufficiently clear that they were printing a type, or could be
made so with a very small change to the diagnostic text.
This creates a namespace for `package` scope.
It looks like names of class_decls in namespaces lead to an unexpected
instref. This is already true, as best as I can tell. I'm not sure if
there's a preferred approach to address that, so I've left a TODO for
now.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Jacob Schneider
josh11b
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins
Chandler Carruthandjosh11b
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith