Stop using the clang tooling library to build an ASTUnit; that library
is set up to process clang frontend arguments, assuming that something
has already built frontend arguments from the compiler arguments. It is
also too encapsulated and doesn't let us inspect and modify the compiler
invocation before it's executed.
Instead, build the AST unit directly in two phases:
* FIrst, take a list of clang driver arguments and convert them into a
list of compiler arguments, using `clang::createInvocation`. Internally,
this uses the clang driver to build a frontend invocation, including
building system-specific include paths as needed.
* Then, directly build an ASTUnit from this compiler invocation.
I've factored this so that we can split out the `createInvocation` step,
with the intention that we may want to move it out of check and into the
carbon driver with the rest of the driver-level argument handling, and
we may want to customize some of the clang options before we invoke the
clang frontend with that set of options.
In order to make the invocation reusable, it no longer depends on the
name of the carbon file importing the C++ code. In place of synthesizing
a header file name as `<foo.carbon>.generated.cpp_imports.h`, we now
insert line marker directives into the generated header so that errors
in that header cause Clang to point a diagnostic back at the Carbon
source file itself. This results in a minor improvement in the
diagnostic output: we no longer refer to a nonexistent generated file.
But the snippet still contains text that doesn't match the source code,
so it remains imperfect.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
When the binding pattern appears within a `var` pattern, convert to a
reference. Otherwise, convert to a value.
This gets the advent of code examples to produce the right answers again
:)
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
I believe we will need to eventually add the specific C++ import
information in `LocId`.
This also seems to fix the `LanguageServerDiagnosticInWrongFile` issue
(#5604).
We're still not in the state we want to be according to
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/5246#issuecomment-2784301206.
Will look into removing the location part from the `"In file included
from ..."` line.
Part of #5245.
Removes the nullptr default for safety.
Note, I think cpp support doesn't allow things like `<version>` or
inline code yet, and language-server support doesn't allow non-hermetic
files, so the best I can test is an error.
What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.
Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:
- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".
[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).
I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.
We had a long discussion of this, so trying to document what seems to be
the conclusion... and also clean up the exceptions that I could find.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
This switches most error printing to use diagnostics instead of direct
stream writes, even when not a specific file diagnostic. I'm allowing
empty filenames for this use-case.
This allows a little more specific testing to validate coverage of
output using the diagnostic coverage test. I'm adding a few tests to
cover things that weren't previously tested.
Separately, this also forces a little more standardization in format...
considering how changes like #4568 show effort being spent to _mirror_
diagnostic style, my thought is now to just use diagnostic code where
possible.
Note this also allows incrementally better testing of the language
server; I'm changing the crash fix from #4847 in favor of diagnostic
testing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
When an `IntLiteral` appears as an operand of an `if` expression,
convert it to `i32` for now, so that we don't reject things like `if
cond then 1 else 2` due to having a non-constant value of type
`IntLiteral`.
For tuple indexing expressions such as `(a, b).0`, convert the index to
type `IntLiteral`, not to type `i32`. This isn't strictly necessary to
do in this PR, but avoids the need to provide an `IntLiteral` -> `i32`
implicit conversion for `no_prelude` tests using this syntax.
I'm working to make sure remaining diagnostics have coverage, at least
the ones I'd previously added a TODO for. Note in particular that I
couldn't figure out a repro for UnaryOperatorRequiresWhitespace; if you
have one, I can add a test, but otherwise maybe it's actually
unreachable due to being diagnosed through infix logic (or, maybe
this'll let fuzzing tell me an example).
Adds coverage for an existing diagnostic. Code appears to work without
modification.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This refactors the diagnostic kind coverage check into something that
also works for node kinds. Then, since this points out a few node kinds
that aren't having their parse verified, I'm adding minor tests for
those.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Richard SmithandChandler Carruth
Boaz Brickner
josh11bandJosh L