Also references were added to clarify that some features are not provisional.
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
The most significant change here is that explorer now uses the chosen spelling
rather than the old `Bool` spelling. Also update a few documentation examples
and some skeletal design docs to use the chosen spelling.
The original sentence was grammatically unsound, specified the three options of copy, move or pointer binding in parenthesis and some words around it.
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
The previous implementation model involved the caller of a function knowing what impls the function will need. With the addition of blanket impls and specialization to the design, that is in general no longer possible. Instead the caller provides a type which is used as a key to look up the impl, which is expected to occur during monomorphization, though we allow the compiler to employ other strategies when the set of impls is predictable.
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Fix `-` -> `+` in `Distance`. Typo noticed by gingerBill in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_8lV0nwsc4 .
Also update factory function names `Create` -> `Make`, to reflect latest thinking.
This follows #1274 , #1325 , #1328 , #1336 , and #1347 . This has miscellaneous changes to the design overview without a particular focus.
Also adds some missing keywords to our list of keywords.
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This follows #1274 , #1325 , and #1328 . It fills in the "Bidirectional interoperability with C and C++" section.
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This follows #1274 and #1325 and fills in the "safety" section. It only covers our approach in general terms.
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
This follows #1274 . It mainly fills in the "generics" section, with smaller updates to other section.
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Reorganizes the sections, and makes a pass filling in and updating the first sections including: types, functions, user-defined types. The following sections are left for part 2, including names, generics, and interop.
Also some smaller updates to, not revisiting the text: `pattern_matching.md`, `control_flow/return.md`, and `lexical_conventions/numeric_literals.md`
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
This proposal:
- Adds support for interfaces requiring other types than `Self` to implement interfaces, as in:
```
interface IntLike {
impl i32 as As(Self);
// ...
}
```
- Defines requirements on how to satisfy those requirements that have a `where` clause.
- Extends `observe` declarations to include saying a type implements an interface, so code can provide a proof instead of the compiler having to perform a recursive search.
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Add concrete design for interfaces for comparison.
Rename interfaces for arithmetic following current thinking in #1058.
Update rules for mixed-type comparisons for data classes following #710.
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
This proposal has three main contributions:
- Types with generic parameters have an identity that consists of the types names plus the values of those parameters.
- The parameters of a type may be deduced from a function's argument.
- Types with generic parameters do not support specialization. Instead, a type can delegate to an interface to opt in to allowing specific customization points.
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Allow interfaces and implementations to be forward declared.
```
// Forward declare interface `F`
interface F;
class C {
// Forward declare `C` implements `F`
impl as F;
}
// Definitions corresponding to forward declarations
interface F { ... }
impl C as F { ... }
```
To allow members of interfaces with default definitions to be forward declared, prefix them with the keyword `default`, following #1082.
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Operators rewrite to calls of specific operator interface functions, so you overload an operator for a type by implementing an interface for it. There is a `like` operator for defining a set if implementations for supporting implicit conversions more conveniently.
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Add support for arithmetic operators:
- Unary `+`.
- Binary `+`, `-`, `*`, `/`, `%`.
Specify their behavior for integer and floating-point types. Signed integer overflow is a programming error, handled in various ways. Unsigned integer overflow is specified as wrapping around, intended for hashing / crypto / PRNG use cases.
Co-authored-by: jonmeow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Support for member access expressions with syntax `container.member`, covering cases such as:
* `object.field`
* `object.method(args)`
* `package.namespace.class.member`
* `object.(interface.member)`
* `object.(class.member)`
... and so on. Includes the rule for template name lookup as decided in #949.
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This is intended to be a more iterative edit to the chart:
- Adding `if` and struct literals, since it came up in arithmetic.
- Adding links to address a comment of mine about wanting references
- Rephrasing slightly to reduce the implication that it's only for operators (particularly since I don't think we want to call `if` an operator)
- Shifting operators below because similar
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Adrien Leravat
Krishna Agarwal
Richard Smith
Shakeel MahateandJon Ross-Perkins
Kshitij roodkee
ooxi
Josh Soref
Aleksey Kladov
Arno Gourdol
Ryan Russell
Richard Smithandjosh11b