What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.
Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:
- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".
[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).
I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.
We had a long discussion of this, so trying to document what seems to be
the conclusion... and also clean up the exceptions that I could find.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
This switches most error printing to use diagnostics instead of direct
stream writes, even when not a specific file diagnostic. I'm allowing
empty filenames for this use-case.
This allows a little more specific testing to validate coverage of
output using the diagnostic coverage test. I'm adding a few tests to
cover things that weren't previously tested.
Separately, this also forces a little more standardization in format...
considering how changes like #4568 show effort being spent to _mirror_
diagnostic style, my thought is now to just use diagnostic code where
possible.
Note this also allows incrementally better testing of the language
server; I'm changing the crash fix from #4847 in favor of diagnostic
testing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
When an `IntLiteral` appears as an operand of an `if` expression,
convert it to `i32` for now, so that we don't reject things like `if
cond then 1 else 2` due to having a non-constant value of type
`IntLiteral`.
For tuple indexing expressions such as `(a, b).0`, convert the index to
type `IntLiteral`, not to type `i32`. This isn't strictly necessary to
do in this PR, but avoids the need to provide an `IntLiteral` -> `i32`
implicit conversion for `no_prelude` tests using this syntax.
I'm working to make sure remaining diagnostics have coverage, at least
the ones I'd previously added a TODO for. Note in particular that I
couldn't figure out a repro for UnaryOperatorRequiresWhitespace; if you
have one, I can add a test, but otherwise maybe it's actually
unreachable due to being diagnosed through infix logic (or, maybe
this'll let fuzzing tell me an example).
Adds coverage for an existing diagnostic. Code appears to work without
modification.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This refactors the diagnostic kind coverage check into something that
also works for node kinds. Then, since this points out a few node kinds
that aren't having their parse verified, I'm adding minor tests for
those.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Boaz Brickner
Richard Smith
josh11bandJosh L