Commit Graph
20 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth 07afa07127 Fix missing include for std::log2 (#7015)
Some standard libraries require this include for the code to compile.
2026-04-02 18:27:46 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins d47b6221ae Fix invalid digit caret (#6921)
Stumbled on this playing with numeric literals

Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini
2026-03-17 18:13:55 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 2e32f309eb Small improvements to APInt handling (#6918)
I was looking for uses of APInt that care about the bit width we're
using, just searching for uses of "64", since #6908 started applying the
minimum with of 64 bits more explicitly.

- numeric_literal.cpp: piping through the sign bit request, allowing
`exponent` to assume it's already 64-bit (putting the CHECK in to just
expose the logic, keeping it outside the `if` because the `if` is an
edge case and I was thinking to avoid edge case inconsistencies slipping
by)
- inst_fingerprinter.cpp: reducing logic to copy words

Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini
2026-03-17 17:11:30 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandChandler Carruth 613a139bef Add support for octal numbers (#6909)
This implements the leads decision made in #6821, proposal #6910. The
proposal is pending, but I figured it's relatively safe to just do given
the decision.

Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2026-03-16 21:28:37 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins c5761d2d16 Improve parsing large integers (#6908)
Though I started this thinking about performance of parse of large
decimal integers, I extended it to generally improve performance of
integer values (TBH I hadn't expected such a difference for binary/hex,
but I'll take it).

Note I think tests change because I'm making subtle changes to bit
widths. The changes themselves appear harmless to me, but happy to make
changes if it'd help.

Bumping up the number of digits by 10x because it's not really a
performance issue anymore (eh, maybe somebody will want to specify a
256-byte value in binary). But, at a certain point it still seems like a
mistake if somebody has that many digits in a row.

Fixes #980

Highlighting benchmark differences:
```diff
- BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/1           37.1 ns         37.1 ns     18887116
+ BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/1           21.9 ns         21.9 ns     31902433
- BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/10000 1251228680 ns   1250457559 ns            1
+ BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/10000     458818 ns       458626 ns         1523
- BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/1            29.0 ns         29.0 ns     24058533
+ BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/1            22.2 ns         22.1 ns     31566949
- BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/10000     1390557 ns      1389782 ns          506
+ BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/10000       16402 ns        16396 ns        42744
- BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/1               34.0 ns         34.0 ns     20562432
+ BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/1               22.4 ns         22.4 ns     31238055
- BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/10000        5387942 ns      5385262 ns          130
+ BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/10000          39249 ns        39233 ns        17859
```

Benchmark before:
```
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                                  Time             CPU   Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_Lex_Float                            10.6 ns         10.6 ns     66138191
BM_Lex_Int                              15.5 ns         15.4 ns     45149703
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/1                    3.11 ns         3.11 ns    225524908
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/10                   11.8 ns         11.8 ns     56719805
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/100                   102 ns          102 ns      6867468
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/1000                  943 ns          942 ns       745313
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/10000                9465 ns         9461 ns        73970
BM_ComputeValue_Float                   61.6 ns         61.6 ns     11377463
BM_ComputeValue_Int                      106 ns          106 ns      6587381
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/1           37.1 ns         37.1 ns     18887116
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/10          87.7 ns         87.7 ns      7960837
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/100         7963 ns         7956 ns        88858
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/1000     1212577 ns      1211906 ns          578
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/10000 1251228680 ns   1250457559 ns            1
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/1            29.0 ns         29.0 ns     24058533
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/10           69.4 ns         69.4 ns     10108642
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/100           963 ns          962 ns       726982
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/1000        21562 ns        21551 ns        32506
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/10000     1390557 ns      1389782 ns          506
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/1               34.0 ns         34.0 ns     20562432
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/10              70.4 ns         70.4 ns      9953165
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/100             1474 ns         1473 ns       472776
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/1000           61818 ns        61762 ns        11363
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/10000        5387942 ns      5385262 ns          130
```

Benchmark after:
```
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                                  Time             CPU   Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_Lex_Float                            10.9 ns         10.9 ns     63993114
BM_Lex_Int                              15.1 ns         15.1 ns     46869766
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/1                    3.16 ns         3.16 ns    220923300
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/10                   12.2 ns         12.2 ns     57731654
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/100                   102 ns          102 ns      6875516
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/1000                  942 ns          942 ns       742359
BM_Lex_IntDecimalN/10000                9353 ns         9350 ns        75096
BM_ComputeValue_Float                   44.9 ns         44.9 ns     15619691
BM_ComputeValue_Int                     48.9 ns         48.9 ns     14361507
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/1           21.9 ns         21.9 ns     31902433
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/10          30.3 ns         30.3 ns     23134117
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/100          224 ns          223 ns      3092567
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/1000        5834 ns         5830 ns       117469
BM_ComputeValue_IntDecimalN/10000     458818 ns       458626 ns         1523
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/1            22.2 ns         22.1 ns     31566949
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/10           32.9 ns         32.9 ns     21306927
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/100           198 ns          198 ns      3545277
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/1000         1671 ns         1669 ns       419656
BM_ComputeValue_IntBinaryN/10000       16402 ns        16396 ns        42744
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/1               22.4 ns         22.4 ns     31238055
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/10              47.8 ns         47.7 ns     14694407
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/100              436 ns          436 ns      1609794
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/1000            3966 ns         3962 ns       177109
BM_ComputeValue_IntHexN/10000          39249 ns        39233 ns        17859
```

Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini
2026-03-16 20:00:51 +00:00
Thomas Köppe bf32da8dad Add missing standard library header inclusions (#5316)
Discovered by clang-tidy.
2025-04-17 15:37:57 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins acbe6530c3 Move diagnostics into a namespace (#5173)
What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.

Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:

- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".

[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).

I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.
2025-03-26 19:12:10 +00:00
Richard Smith 28602a87c2 Fix handling of repeated tuple indexing. (#4733)
Per [the
design](https://docs.carbon-lang.dev/docs/design/lexical_conventions/),
`x.1.2` should lex as `(x.1).2`, not as `x.(1.2)`.
2024-12-21 06:57:14 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 61c0a8b676 Make more use of llvm STLExtras (#4668)
This is essentially the result of looking at `.begin()` uses. We also
frequently do `std::shuffle`, but unfortunately STLExtras doesn't
provide a wrapper for that.
2024-12-11 18:16:38 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 5bdeb010c8 Clean up format_provider uses (#4417)
Building on https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/4411,
replace format_provider uses (other than `TokenKind`, which is more on
the okay side of things)

Also does some edits to `ClassMemberDefinition` to try to better match
diagnostic style
2024-10-17 18:47:29 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith e7aebbe581 Update basic diagnostic capitalization/punctuation (#4328)
This is a primarily automated change:

- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
    - `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
    - `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
    - ERROR -> error
    - WARNING -> warning

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2024-09-19 21:32:53 +00:00
4845f40dff Switch CARBON_CHECK to a format string API (#4285)
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.

The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.

As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.

However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.

One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.

This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256      86.3µs ± 1%  82.9µs ± 1%  -3.94%  (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024      431µs ± 1%   415µs ± 1%  -3.76%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096     1.77ms ± 1%  1.71ms ± 1%  -3.18%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384    7.44ms ± 1%  7.17ms ± 2%  -3.56%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536    30.7ms ± 1%  29.7ms ± 1%  -3.15%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144    131ms ± 1%   127ms ± 1%  -2.81%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256       878µs ± 2%   800µs ± 1%  -8.91%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024     1.88ms ± 2%  1.72ms ± 1%  -8.56%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096     5.78ms ± 2%  5.28ms ± 1%  -8.70%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384    21.9ms ± 1%  20.1ms ± 1%  -8.02%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536    90.4ms ± 2%  83.1ms ± 1%  -8.04%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144    381ms ± 2%   352ms ± 1%  -7.79%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-12 16:42:08 +00:00
Richard Smith 4a8a7bf6aa Remove declaration of function deleted in #4150. (#4151) 2024-07-22 17:26:58 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 4c6dc2eade Remove irregular digit placement check from NumericLiteral. (#4150)
This changed in #1983 and although we updated explorer, we missed
toolchain.
2024-07-19 20:46:25 +00:00
Chandler Carruth dd0890619a Enable a couple of boring warnings. (#4018)
Just spotted these while looking at warnings that seem to fire on our
code are probably are things we'd fix if we saw them. None of these seem
important FWIW.

Also removes a redundant flag that is part of `-Wall`.

I have a follow-up for the high-value warning I spotted that motivated
me to look at all of this. But it's noisy so kept it as a separate PR.
2024-06-03 05:02:26 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins ee467900ed Use llvm:: for specializations instead of 'namespace llvm' (#3682)
We already do this with things like llvm::DenseMapInfo, I don't know why
I was doing this with format_provider. But this should be more
consistent, and slightly better for not entering another library's
namespace.
2024-02-01 22:58:04 +00:00
josh11b 9390e666ce startswith -> starts_with to match upstream (#3519)
This matches the change to upstream `llvm::StringRef`, see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75491 .
2023-12-18 17:47:02 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 05723095bc Switch formatv adapters to format_provider (#3434)
The main difference I'm aiming for is that clangd doesn't complain about
the struct being unused, but it does miss the function's use. But really
these are specific to formatv for diagnostics, so this is more clearly
marking such, and probably makes for a better pattern for the future.
2023-11-30 18:33:03 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 0db63ff17a Abbreviate Integer and FloatingPoint (#3435)
I was suggesting this because `FloatingPoint` is pretty long. `int` and
`float` should be familiar abbreviations. `unsigned` should be familiar
to developers too, but `UnsignedInt` still feels usefully clearer for
the additional chars.
2023-11-29 23:29:48 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandChandler Carruth ec182fb00d Rename lexer dir to lex (#3179)
Continuing with #3070. Just a dir and file rename (only prefix change is
lexer_file_test). Everything in the lex dir should be marked as a move.

Note, I think this closes #3070. There may still be further cleanup
later, but the organizational changes suggested there are being
completed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 02:39:04 +00:00