Commit Graph
47 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith b138c90c9e Use constant evaluation to determine the identity of types. (#3617)
Remove the type canonicalization mechanism and instead rely on constant
canonicalization to deduplicate types.

Rename the `Canonicalize*Type` functions to reflect that they're no
longer performing canonicalization. Switch code that creates types due
to semantic checking, rather than due to source syntax, to directly
create type constants through evaluation rather than creating an
instruction and evaluating it to produce a separate constant
representation.

The mapping from `const (const T)` that was previously performed by type
canonicalization is now implemented in expression evaluation instead.

The value `<error>` is now treated as a constant value, with a special
property that an instruction involving `<error>` that could possibly be
constant evaluates to `<error>`. This helps avoid producing follow-on
errors when an error occurs as a subexpression of an expression, such as
a type, that is intended to be constant.
2024-01-19 00:47:37 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins d0fb4b5815 Change DiagnoseDuplicateName to expect an inst ID for the duplicate. (#3616)
This makes duplicate and previous definition handling match. While we
may want to make both point more fine-grained at the name, the necessary
logic seems likely to be equivalent.

Note, I'm looking at this mainly due to duplicate names in imports,
where it's especially helpful to take an instruction instead of a parse
node. We'll eventually want to handle parse nodes from other imports
better, and I think this is the way it would most likely work.
2024-01-18 23:23:31 +00:00
Richard Smith 29c294880d Deduplicate and canonicalize all constants. (#3611)
Rather than producing multiple constants with the same value, fold all
instances of a given constant to the same constant instruction.

A future PR will use this to replace the current type canonicalization
system.
2024-01-18 21:42:19 +00:00
Richard Smith 906346cf35 Ensure we evaluate instructions created in uncommon ways. (#3598)
Instructions created by splices during conversion are now evaluated, as
are instructions created in cases where we first create a placeholder
instruction and later replace it by a different instruction.

This also removes the ability to set a parse node and instruction
independently after creating an `InstId`, which could lead to them
accidentally not matching.
2024-01-16 21:28:14 +00:00
Richard Smith d712bf12a6 Remove parse nodes from constants. (#3599)
These instructions are intended to be shared across all uses and so
don't have a meaningful location. So far, only type constants are
shared.
2024-01-13 04:52:25 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins e305c896a1 Add TODOs for implicit params to class and interface. (#3596)
Without these, the code crashes.
2024-01-12 22:40:11 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins f5e9158fa7 Support passing an InstId for check diagnostics. (#3597) 2024-01-12 22:09:32 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith f197219c10 Split parse nodes out from instructions because they're rarely used. (#3590)
The parse nodes are still tracked as part of the same value store
interface in order to ensure parity, but they're split out from Inst
itself in order to reduce the size of Inst -- the expectation is that
they don't need to be passed around quite as much.

This change doesn't actually reduce the passing very much, although
there are hints of it: AddInstAndPush doesn't typically need a separate
parse node from the one on the Inst itself, for example. In a couple
spots I changed code to rely a little more on the InstId until the
ParseNode is needed, but it's very low hanging fruit where done. I think
convert could do more to not eagerly fetch the parse node before its
use, but more cleanup felt it would be easier to handle separately. I'm
currently viewing this as making such cleanup _possible_ rather than
executing on it up-front.

But also, I want to make sure there's a consensus to head in this
direction before pulling the trigger. We speculated that this would
result in the parse node being passed around less, and I do think that's
the case, although it's a bit fuzzy in the change.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2024-01-12 19:01:51 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith cad4605dad Add imports of enclosing scopes. (#3575)
Namespaces are copied, which means also adding their name to the
underlying instruction. It happened not to be done previously; the name
was only in name lookup.

Since the only import supported right now is the default import,
functionality is limited; in the future I'll need to deal with namespace
vs package conflicts.

Tests of namespace imports are under "namespace" -- I figured this would
be best for scaling as more instructions get support.

This also improves some debugging-related output that I was trying to
use while trying to build the support.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2024-01-10 17:36:50 +00:00
Richard Smith a6508fcf05 Basic support for generic bindings. (#3555)
This change adds a `BindSymbolicName` instruction for generic bindings,
paralleling the existing `BindName`. A mechanism is also added to allow
both kinds of binding to be accessed uniformly, for convenience in the
case where the two different kinds of binding are treated the same.

Generic bindings of type `type` are allowed to be used as types,
although no operations are provided for such types. For now lowering
treats these types as empty structs, which seems like a reasonable
lowering for non-monomorphized unconstrained types.
2024-01-05 03:39:45 +00:00
josh11b 770876bbcb Define Any...DeclId aliases for brevity (#3562) 2024-01-04 00:03:44 +00:00
josh11bandRichard Smith b0da52a3d7 Use typed parse node ids in SemIR instruction types (#3560)
This involves a number of supporting changes:
* The `parse_node;` member of instruction types may now have any type
derived from `Parse::NodeId` and is no longer required to have that
exact type.
* `Parse::Node::Invalid` is now a singleton object of a separate type
that is convertible to `Parse::NodeId` and its descendants. This
replaces the `Invalid` member of its descendants, and avoids having to
write long `NodeIdOneOf<...>` types when initializing variables to
invalid.
* `IndexBase` now allows `==` and `!=` comparisons between its derived
classes and types that are convertible to those types.
* A number of functions in the check stage have been changed to preserve
more type information instead of using `Parse::NodeId`.
* `NodeIdForKind<K>` (also known as `KId`) now has a `Kind` member so it
may be used to declare `NodeIdOneOf<T, U>` types without #including
`parse/typed_nodes.h`.
* `NodeIdForKind<K>` (also known as `KId`) may be implicitly converted
to `NodeIdOneOf<T, U>` if `T::Kind == K` or `U::Kind == K` (executing a
TODO).

Many of the `parse_node` members were not converted since they would
have required more extensive changes. They have been marked with "TODO"
comments.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2024-01-03 23:13:30 +00:00
josh11bandChandler Carruth 48c986f52d Start using typed parse node ids in the check stage (#3547)
Goal is to increase type safety, though more work needs to be done (see
added TODOs).

Note that, after this change, check handlers corresponding to deleted
parse node kinds will no longer compile.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2023-12-29 01:28:09 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 3d661c96f3 Handle out-of-line declarations. (#3536)
By adding an InstId to the NameScope, we can determine whether the
declaration is being added to a scoped entity (versus a namespace).

The choice of InstId on NameScope is chosen versus other solutions
because, for imports, we want to just have a list of InstIds to import
and, from those, get the containing namespaces for addition. Similar may
also be desirable for printing fully qualified names given a singular
InstId. That means an InstId must have a path to find enclosing name
scopes.

What we're looking at here is:

- NameScopeId knows its InstId. (done here)
- Inst knows the enclosing NameScopeId. (future work)
- To walk up enclosing scopes for an Inst:
  1. Fetch the Inst.
2. Find its enclosing NameScopeId (which will be per-declaration due to
Function etc complexity).
  3. Fetch the NameScope if not Package scope. (if Package scope, done)
  4. Use the InstId on the NameScope to go back to step 1.
2023-12-21 18:36:33 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins de0c02ddae If a name is not found in a class, perform lookup into base classes. (#3502)
This builds out a little infrastructure for one name scope to `extend`
another. We'll need more refinement here to cover other cases, but this
should provide some foundation for that future work.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2023-12-14 19:51:55 +00:00
josh11b 23c7d7dd99 Underline the complete declaration in diagnostics (#3508)
Builds upon @domisterwoozy 's excellent #3442 . Removes the need to
store the first node of a declaration in the declaration state stack.
2023-12-14 19:18:17 +00:00
josh11b 407079c33a Pop decl state stack earlier (#3483)
Since we switched to using the scope stack instead of the decl state
stack to hold information about the containing definition in #3460 , we
can now pop the decl state at the end of the declaration instead of the
end of the body of the definition.
2023-12-08 23:01:34 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins cef7eb5522 Simplify interface for getting an instruction from a type. (#3455)
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2023-12-08 21:50:33 +00:00
Richard Smith 18d7ba9542 Factor out common pattern of trying to complete a type then falling back to an error type if that fails. (#3454)
As requested in [review of
#3450](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/3450#discussion_r1414220143).
2023-12-07 01:53:30 +00:00
josh11b e9fc07feee Abbreviate "representation" -> "repr" (#3464)
Specifically using these abbreviations:
* InitRepr: "initializing representation"
* ObjectRepr: "object representation"
* ValueRepr: "value representation"

As discussed in [#toolchain
discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1182086098470572143)
and now documented in the [list of
abbreviations](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RRYMm42osyqhI2LyjrjockYCutQ5dOf8Abu50kTrkX0/edit?resourcekey=0-kHyqOESbOHmzZphUbtLrTw#heading=h.pph7i5m5un7q).
2023-12-06 23:11:47 +00:00
josh11b a970b1e587 Require extend before base: BaseType; (#3459) 2023-12-06 20:14:16 +00:00
josh11bandJon Ross-Perkins fada410559 Support declaration modifier keywords (#3412)
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2023-12-05 22:45:57 +00:00
Richard Smith 22dff46ed2 Remove support for disambiguating a stringified type as being a type. (#3456)
Most of the calls to `StringifyType` already passed `true` for
`in_type_context`. Checking the rest, I found that every one of them was
already sufficiently clear that they were printing a type, or could be
made so with a very small change to the diagnostic text.
2023-12-05 17:34:04 +00:00
Richard Smith 433d626b04 Rename SemIR::{Base,Field} -> SemIR::{Base,Field}Decl. (#3452)
Also fix printing of unbound element type to say "element" not "field"
since we're touching all the relevant SemIR output anyway.
2023-12-05 16:37:02 +00:00
Richard Smith 7dffa0c7ec Support for base: T;, .base, x.base. (#3450)
No support for `extend base` yet, in an effort to minimize collisions
with #3412.
2023-12-04 22:45:59 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith 0d618b1278 Tidy up lint issues. (#3429)
These are manual fixes; mostly from clang-tidy, some from clangd (which
notes unused includes).

In typed_insts, adding inlline due to misc-definitions-in-headers. Per
discussion, clang-tidy is wrong, but inline silences it.

For parameter name skew in definition versus declaration, I'm just using
the name from the definition.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2023-11-29 20:41:53 +00:00
Richard Smith 332a368cee Rename Parse::Node -> Parse::NodeId. (#3432)
As discussed [on
discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1178878128714678282)
and today's toolchain discussion.
2023-11-29 18:53:12 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandChandler Carruth 0c0998d7cd Error when passing StringRef to CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC. (#3431)
This gets to a lifetime subtlety, particularly with things like the
sorting diagnostic consumer that delay output. In order to reduce the
chance of accidental references, disallow StringRef in the diagnostics.

For example:

```
./toolchain/diagnostics/diagnostic_emitter.h:162:5: error: static_assert failed due to requirement '!std::is_same_v<llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef>' "Use std::string or llvm::StringLiteral for diagnostic lifetimes."
    static_assert(
    ^
toolchain/check/convert.cpp:477:11: note: in instantiation of member function 'Carbon::Internal::DiagnosticBase<std::string, std::string, llvm::StringRef>::DiagnosticBase' requested here
          CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(StructInitMissingFieldInConversion, Error,
          ^
./toolchain/diagnostics/diagnostic_emitter.h:47:7: note: expanded from macro 'CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC'
      ::Carbon::Internal::DiagnosticBase<__VA_ARGS__>(        \
      ^
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2023-11-29 17:04:11 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins 2715e2276e Parsing and basic checking for abstract class and base class. (#3385)
For now, we require the same introducer to be used each time a class is
declared, but see #3384.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2023-11-13 20:38:21 +00:00
josh11b 5020fdb3be Use abbreviation "decl" instead of "declaration" (#3382)
Part of switching to the [abbreviations we've decided to
use](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RRYMm42osyqhI2LyjrjockYCutQ5dOf8Abu50kTrkX0/edit?resourcekey=0-kHyqOESbOHmzZphUbtLrTw#heading=h.pph7i5m5un7q).

I will rename files in a follow-up PR.
2023-11-10 10:43:25 +00:00
Richard Smith 71aa4a45be Distinguish between name IDs and string IDs in the type system. (#3341)
Add a `NameId` that is effectively just a wrapper around a `StringId`,
with
some additional predefined values for names that don't correspond to
strings, such as the name of `self` or the function's return slot.
2023-11-09 16:51:36 +00:00
Richard Smith 3bee8932a9 Rework name lookup to handle non-lexical scoping. (#3354)
When declaring a name such as `fn Ns.Class.F() { ... }`, enter the
scopes of `Ns` and `Ns.Class` as we form the name, and remain in those
non-lexical scopes until the end of the declaration.

When performing an unqualified lookup, look in any enclosing non-lexical
scopes in addition to looking into the lexical name table.

We now track a scope index with each lookup result in the lexical name
lookup table. This is used to determine whether a lexical or non-lexcial
result is the innermost result and whether a declared name is in the
same scope as some previous introduction of that name or in a nested
scope. For now, this could just be the index into the scope_stack, but
the intent is to also use this to detect names being declared after they
are first looked up, which requires the indexes to outlive their scopes,
so we use a persistent numbering of all scopes instead. The persistent
numbering also permits more invariant checking.
2023-11-06 19:48:41 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 3401eed8d8 Split IdentifierId and StringLiteralId from StringId (#3352)
Following up on discussion yesterday regarding this split.

Note, I'm expecting #3341 to do IdentifierId -> NameId in SemIR. It
might be worth adding NameId creation directly to StringStore if you're
content with this setup though.
2023-11-02 18:44:32 +00:00
josh11bandChandler Carruth 7edfd8e02a Rename SemIR::Node to SemIR::Inst (#3355)
And generally replace "node" by "inst" in the code and "instruction" in
comments.

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
2023-11-02 17:58:30 +00:00
Richard Smith bc8db9406d Support for Self expressions. (#3351) 2023-10-31 19:59:50 +00:00
Richard Smith 620408b999 Basic lowering support for classes. (#3334)
Track the fields in a class, and generate a corresponding struct type as
the object representation for the class. For now, we always use a
pointer as the value representation for a class.
2023-10-25 20:44:24 +00:00
Richard Smith 7f2f4bec4f Add a Field node for fields in a class. (#3332)
This replaces the use of `VarStorage` in this case.

Add an `UnboundFieldType` type as the type of a field, in cases where
it's referenced without an accompanying object.

Add a `BindName` node to describe the name binding performed for both
variables and fields so that we can handle them more uniformly.
2023-10-25 18:49:36 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins e6634d240f Make SemIR::File access more terse. (#3331)
1. In general, `semantics_ir` -> `sem_ir`, to match the directory name.
2. For the list of `ValueStore`-related accessors on `SemIR::File`, add
them to `check`'s `Context` object, shortening access.
2023-10-24 21:05:46 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 1d6298290f Add more value store types to File. (#3317)
Finishing what #3316 started, add more bespoke ValueStore-like
structures to File. With this, the things which previously had somewhat
boilerplate Add/Get functions are now all on side classes, giving a
uniform style of API for calling.

Note, I was on the fence about making things public on ValueStore. If
it's preferred that I make some things there protected I certainly can,
there's just a trade-off that may mean more distinct child/wrapper
types.
2023-10-24 18:23:40 +00:00
Richard Smith 7d9340880e Separate ClassType from ClassDeclaration. (#3329)
Retain the `ClassDeclaration` node to represent a syntactic declaration
of a class (including possibly a declaration of a generic class), but
use a separate SemIR node to represent the class type itself. This
allows us to give the two separate treatment.

The `ClassDeclaration` is still entered into the name lookup table for
its enclosing scope, but when it is named in an expression, the class
type is produced instead. When the class declaration is named in a
declaration name, it can be used to define members of the class, but an
expression that resolves to the class type cannot be used to define
members of the class.

In order to distinguish these cases, use `Name` rather than
`NameExpression` for the left-hand side of a `QualifiedName` parse node.
This removes the only use of the `Expression` form of a declaration
name, so that is also removed.

In the future, `ClassType` will also be used to describe types such as
`Vector(T)`, for which there is no corresponding `ClassDeclaration`.
2023-10-24 01:26:44 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 7e9d644e1f Switch File functions, classes, and types to ValueStores (#3316)
Building on #3313, start using ValueStore on File. Functions and classes
are straightforward. Types here I present as a borderline case where
maybe we want a more bespoke API, but maybe this is okay? Most other
things probably need a slightly different API, which although I might do
that for a consistent interface, felt more out-of-scope for this change.
2023-10-20 22:40:18 +00:00
Richard Smith a46e7dd967 Remove most of the metaprogramming in node.h in favor of listing all the members in the typed node structs. (#3310)
Split `node.h` into separate files for ID types (`id.h`) and for typed
nodes (`typed_nodes.h`). The per-node-kind data is now specified as part
of declaring the typed nodes, and is removed from the node kinds
x-macros, which now simply enumerate the node kinds.
2023-10-20 20:26:10 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 1b55ad86dd Extend SharedValueStores to SemIR (#3313)
Building on #3311, change SemIR to use the SharedValueStore. Since this
removes hermeticity, raw output no longer prints ints, reals, and
strings. TokenizedBuffer accessors are modified to return IDs because
values are often passed through in semantics without needing to read
them.

I would've put SharedValueStores on Context, except for the
GetArrayBoundValue convenience method. I felt awkward removing that, so
it's on File, at least for now. That's then used by the formatter and
Lower too. The flipside of this is that TokenizedBuffer has a
SharedValueStores only for printing, so maybe that's similar enough to
what File is doing.

This doesn't start shifting other SemIR members to ValueStore, but that
seems like a next step.
2023-10-20 17:53:00 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith d13f76e001 Add value store to be shared across compile stages. (#3311)
This updates lexing to use the data. I'll do checking separately, just
to split changes.

Note the ValueStore structure is also set up such that SemIR::File can
use it for other fields.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2023-10-20 15:00:53 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins b01dfb3f93 Support for class definitions with static member functions. (#3305)
This includes being able to define a class that was previously
forward-declared, and being able to define a member function out-of-line
that was previously declared inside a class.

No support for fields or methods yet, and a class definition doesn't yet
cause the class to be treated as a complete type.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2023-10-18 19:49:45 +00:00
Richard Smith 4e64b1948d Bare-bones support for forward-declared classes. (#3294)
This is mostly scaffolding, but is just about enough for pointers to
classes to work properly as types.
2023-10-13 21:29:50 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 1c748c0f14 Split semantics into check and sem_ir directories (#3176)
Continuing along with #3070. Note this is just a file rename, with BUILD
edits; every file previously in semantics/ should show as moved (except
maybe BUILDs, which split).
2023-08-31 19:54:32 +00:00