Commit Graph
12 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth 8be274cf60 Replace :! binding syntax with phase keywords and contextual defaults (#7479)
Implement the toolchain side of proposal #7254, removing the `:!`
binding
syntax for generic and template parameters in favor of the keywords
`generic`,
`template`, and `runtime` plus contextual defaults for phase.

For valid programs this is semantics-preserving: each binding resolves
to the
same phase, and produces the same SemIR, as it did under `:!`/`:`. The
parser
derives a binding's phase from its syntactic context plus any explicit
phase
keyword; new diagnostics and error recovery for misused keywords are
described
below.

Implementation details for each component:

- Lexer: remove the `:!` (`ColonExclaim`) token, move its virtual
parse-node
  budget onto `:`, and add the `generic` and `runtime` keywords.
- Parser: thread a `BindingContext` (`ExplicitParam`, `DeducedParam`, or
`CompileTimeEntityParam`) from declaration introducers down through
parameter
lists to each binding pattern, using a one-token lookahead to
distinguish a
name-qualifier parameter list from a declaration's own final list.
Parameters
of a compile-time entity (`class`, `interface`, `constraint`, `choice`,
`alias`, `export`, `namespace`) and deduced `[]` parameters default to
checked
generic; explicit function parameters and local bindings default to
runtime.
`HandleBindingPattern` resolves the phase from that context plus the
keyword: a
`generic` keyword needs no node of its own (the phase is carried by the
  binding's node kind), while a `runtime` keyword is preserved as a
`RuntimeBindingName` node so `check` can name it in a diagnostic. A
phase
keyword that is merely redundant with the contextual default is
diagnosed
  here, without invalidating the parse tree.
- Check: a phase keyword that is invalid for its context (for example
`runtime`
on a checked-generic parameter) is diagnosed here, and recovers by
building an
error binding that still introduces the name so that later uses of it do
not
  produce cascading errors.

The removed `:!` syntax is now rejected as an ordinary parse error.

The `form`/`:?`/`->?` ("extended types") portion of proposal #7254 is
left for a
separate change.

Assisted-by: Claude Code
2026-07-11 01:22:44 +00:00
Chandler Carruthandjosh11b 7871237c15 Move self to the explicit () parameter list (proposal #7016) (#7272)
Implements proposal #7016: `self` moves from the deduced implicit list
(`fn F[self: Self]()`) to the front of the explicit list. Its type may
be written explicitly (`fn F(self: Self)`) or omitted, in which case it
defaults to `Self` (`fn F(self)`, `fn F(ref self)`); `self` in the
implicit list is rejected.

Throughout checking, `self` is modeled as the first explicit parameter.
Because a method is just a function whose first parameter is `self`, it
can also be called as an ordinary function with the receiver passed
explicitly (`Type.M(obj, ...)`), not only as `obj.M(...)`. A new
`SemIR::CallArgParamPatterns` helper chooses the parameters matched
against the explicit arguments, excluding a leading `self` only when it
is supplied as a method-call receiver; arity checking, conversion, and
generic deduction use it. The resulting SemIR and lowering are
unchanged: `self` is still `call_param0`, and witnesses, thunks, and
vtables are unaffected.

An omitted `self` type is parsed as a `SelfBindingPattern` node with no
type expression; checking synthesizes the `Self` type so it behaves
exactly like `self: Self`. However, the exact spelling used must match
between a forward declaration and a definition, following #3763's rules
around declaration matching.

Generated functions, thunks, and C++ interop import/export build `self`
as the first explicit parameter, and the `self`-type override (e.g.
Derived->Base for a virtual override) applies to the explicit `self`.
Placement is validated by new diagnostics: `SelfInImplicitParamList`,
`SelfNotFirstParam`, and `SelfOutsideParamList`. The benchmark source
generator and the documentation adopt the `(self)` shorthand; the
prelude, the examples, and the test data are migrated in the following
commits.

Assisted-by: Claude Code with Claude Opus 4.7

---------

Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-10 15:30:43 +00:00
Richard Smith ae6846197a Remove trailing () from Core.*Literal and Core.Bool. (#7313)
We exposed `Core.IntLiteral()`, `Core.FloatLiteral()`,
`Core.CharLiteral()`, and `Core.Bool()` as functions as a workaround,
because we had no way to provide the type names without parentheses that
the design requests. But now we can do so, by using an alias. Switch all
of these over from being functions to simply being names of the
corresponding types.

Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
2026-06-05 22:33:30 +00:00
Richard SmithandCarbon Infra Bot 7f0f402f95 Add advent of code 2024 day 14 and day 15 part 1 solutions (#6597)
I've had these kicking around for a year but never got around to pushing
them. They seem to cover a few things that previous examples didn't, so
I think we may as well include them.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
2026-01-14 18:33:23 +00:00
Richard Smithandjosh11b 4ddba4ab1e Modernize advent of code examples (#6496)
* Use generics in more places.
* Use `ref` in more places.
* Use `for` in more places.
* Use a little bit of C++ interop.
* Use an adapter for the `char`-or-EOF result of reading a char instead
of pure `i32`, and use char literals where possible.

---------

Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-12-17 23:26:26 +00:00
josh11bandJosh L c329bce240 PrintChar from "io" library takes a char (#6264)
As [observed in
#toolchain](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1428791603786416351),
this makes demo code nicer.

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-10-23 16:38:20 +00:00
Richard Smith c34d0c7adf Add Core.Range(N) facility to construct an integer range. (#5699)
Use it in examples where appropriate.

Depends on #5698.
2025-06-26 20:13:07 +00:00
Richard Smith fb1a9ba20f Use explicit conversion between integer types in examples. (#4792) 2025-01-11 01:46:32 +00:00
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins d2d5c5520b Solutions for advent of code, day 4 - 13. (#4750)
A collection of additional Carbon examples demonstrating current
language capabilities and some limitations of the current state of the
toolchain.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2025-01-07 19:42:40 +00:00
Richard Smith a536dbd8d9 Solution for advent of code day 3. (#4713) 2024-12-19 18:23:50 +00:00
Richard Smith 0fa699641a Solution for advent of code day 2. (#4708) 2024-12-19 17:18:19 +00:00
Richard Smith 3645143e27 Add solutions for advent of code 2024 day 1 to examples/. (#4673)
In order to support these examples, this adds two new builtins to the
toolchain: `print.char` and `read.char`, which map to the libc functions
`putchar` and `getchar`.
2024-12-17 00:47:51 +00:00