Using the same const/constexpr done in EnumBase, adds Invalid and Builtin* values to replace Make functions that produced the same. This should make it clearer at call sites what the cost actually is, and reduces the syntactic overhead for MakeBuiltinReference in particular.
Really, this is that MakeBuiltinReference has been feeling pretty verbose, so I did that, and then one MakeInvalid is right next to it, and then obviously I should replace the other MakeInvalid for consistency...
Name lookup into namespaces needs to be resolved early, as part of name resolution, so that we can properly diagnose references to entities before they are fully declared. Make name resolution set a target `value_node` on simple member accesses that name namespace members, and in type-checking rewrite those member accesses into `IdentifierExpression`s that directly reference the namespace member.
pre-commit autoupdate --freeze && pre-commit run -a
This update may be triggering incompatibilities with old installs. If you see an issue such as:
```
An unexpected error has occurred: CalledProcessError: command: ('python', '-mpip', 'install', '.')
```
Try updating pip packages, particularly:
```
pip3 install -U pre-commit
pip3 install -U virtualenv
```
First step towards permitting declarations within namespaces. Supports only functions within namespaces for now, with no way to call those functions except from within other such functions. Unqualified lookups within a function in a namespace look in that namespace first.
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Split the `where A == B` constraint in two: `where .A = B` produces a new
constraint from an old one, where the value of `.A` in the new constraint is
known and eagerly rewritten to `B`, and `where A == B`, which does not cause
`A` and `B` to be considered as identical by language rules but does permit
implicit (no-op) conversion between them.
This aims to provide an efficiently-computable and human-understandable type
equality rule, with type canonicalization and therefore transitive type
equality, without sacrificing too much in the way of ergonomics and without
sacrificing determinism, while still providing the full power of a general type
constraint system in a less ergonomic form.
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
The toolchain link just needed a resourcekey.
The open discussion link may just not work because it was pre-go-public, so it points at a doc that we probably copied.
Co-authored-by: josh11b <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
I'm running a `bazel build //...` now and things look fine, so I'm guessing this is now correct. But it seems like GH changed something about their /archive/ downloads that just changed the checksums. Releases appear to be unaffected. I don't have any reference for what changed though.
https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/15128 says to use /refs/tags, but I think we can't do that when we're trying to get a specific commit.
As per the `TODO` comment in the file, the `CallableDeclaration::name` property was refactored into `FunctionDeclaration`, which is currently the only namable callable declaration kind. I was able to rely on the existing `GetName` function to replace call sites of the accessor function with nearly identical swaps.
Fixes#2531
Assignment is permitted only as a complete statement, not as a subexpression.
Assignment and compound assignment syntax follow C++ in all other respects.
Pre-increment is provided. Post-increment is not. Uses of all of these operators
are translated into calls to interface members.
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Lazy allocation means that we can use a single node block for _all_ empty node blocks. The change in timing for when the definition node is emitted shouldn't affect semantic correctness; the signature is already present for recursive calls.
This change is to make it clearer what is a TODO versus unexpected behavior. I'm doing this now because I feel it's been getting a little confusing in code.
So for example if I write the code a return type `-> i32`, I get the diagnostic output plus the dump of the (invalid) IR:
```
/carbon-lang/toolchain/semantics/testdata/function/basic.carbon:37:10: Semantics TODO: HandleReturnType
cross_reference_irs_size: 1
callables: [
]
integer_literals: [
]
strings: [
]
nodes: [
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block0, type: node0},
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block1, type: node1},
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block2, type: node0},
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block3, type: node0},
]
node_blocks: [
[
],
]
```
For parameters (and in the future, arguments too; generally comma-separated lists) track two node blocks:
1. param_ir: The complete IR.
2. param_refs: Nodes within the IR that are the "root" parameter.
param_refs should allow quick counting of the # of parameters, and more efficient comparison of call args with function parameters. param_ir should be necessary to generate the actual signature.
In order to construct this, this refactors the node_block_stack into its own class, which is reused in params_stack. These carry references to the underlying SmallVector for lazy modification in order to avoid a dependency cycle with SemanticsIR (also see notes on empty node blocks below).
When finalized, the block pair is pushed onto finished_params_stack. That's because node_stack only has space for one thing, and this is two things -- so I'm essentially choosing a trade-off of adding another stack in order to avoid consuming more space in the expectation that most parse nodes have 0 or 1 things to return, and 2 will be very rare.
As factored, this currently consolidates most empty node blocks into a single canonical empty node block. This is because I think empty blocks, i.e. `()`, will be very common. In order to achieve this, SemanticsNodeBlockStack does lazy creation.
An alternative approach would have been to use 1 node block per parameter. We decided against this in order to reduce the number of vectors being created.
This was discussed in person with at least two of the leads while
drafting the text, but sadly it did not finish being typed into the
document.
Just amending the proposal text for the future as I don't think it
substantively changes the conclusions.
Thanks to @geoffromer for noticing this!
Move deallocation logic to `StepCleanUp` to have all necessary cleanup actions in the same place. Currently this means `DestroyAction` and `heap_.Deallocate`.
The comment on FunctionParameterFinish is actually correct (`1. FunctionParameter`), just a typo in the implementation. It specifically failed parsing at the comma after the 2nd param, regardless of whether there were more params.
Fix variables not being properly cleaned up if declared before an unformed variable.
### Details
Currently the following example / test
```
package ExplorerTest api;
class A {
var i: i32;
destructor[self: Self] {
Print("Destructor A {0}", self.i);
}
}
fn Main() -> i32 {
var a0: A;
var a1: A = {.i = 1};
var a2: A;
var a3: A = {.i = 3};
return 0;
}
```
prints
```
Destructor A 3
```
instead of
```
Destructor A 3
Destructor A 1
```
This PR fixes the issue in the `CleanUp` logic.
Add support for user-defined assignment, as well as compound assignment and increment, following the design direction in pending proposal #2511.
Some of this isn't fully testable yet: because explorer doesn't properly support `impl` specialization, the blanket `impl`s in the prelude prevent types from customizing assignment.
Naming this ToString within the Carbon namespace encourages incidental overloading of the function, and that doesn't seem to be intentional; this feels questionable [under overloading style](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Function_Overloading). OperatorToString seems helpful in that it makes it easy to see at a glance where it's being used.
Allow explicit conversion from a tuple of `T1`, `T2`, ... to a tuple of `U1`, `U2`, ... if each element has an explicit conversion.
Also add a comment to existing `ImplicitAs` impl for tuples explaining its purpose.
Add a check to prevent creating a class from a struct with a missing parent.
This is already type-checked for carbon / user code, but not when using `Convert` manually.
Although the implementation is similar in size, I think the consistency benefits are helpful. registry.def -> kind.def is also consistent with other implementations.
Also switching int32_t -> uint16_t because I think we it might be enough space (?). We use uint8_t elsewhere, but that's certainly going to be too small. Sticking with int32_t felt inconsistent.
The parser and lexer already produce YAML, so this is fundamentally a consistency issue. I've been thinking about this, and was looking again because I'm working on adding callables, and figured I'd just fix it now.
Add a blanket `ImplicitAs` implementation to perform the conversions that explorer can perform as built-in conversions. This allows those conversions to be detected by constraints and to be used as part of other user-defined conversions. For now, a single monolithic conversion is exposed. I intend to split this up into multiple smaller conversion kinds for each kind of conversion in a follow-up change.
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Fundamentally this `.Print()` is wrong for debug output at present because `.fixed_spelling()` can be empty. It's also inconsistent with other enums to use it. We frequently print tokens for debugging, and it's easy to forget to specify `.name()` there.
Diagnostics use formatv, so we can provide a format_provider and address it in one spot that way. It also makes it harder to just forget to do the right thing.
Add basic support for `match_first` declarations to explorer, as described in https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/docs/design/generics/details.md#prioritization-rule. The concrete syntax here is not yet approved, so `match_first` is renamed to `__match_first` for now, but the semantics are necessary to implement other approved features in explorer so we're intentionally getting a little ahead of the design here.
Improves the error produced when 'Main' is declared with parameters. Resolves a TODO in the typechecker. Explorer only.
PR also adds a test for this error message.
Currently, only the action class uses the noun case (`Cleanup`), while the kind enum and functions are spelled `CleanUpAction`. Other actions use consistent casing between class and enum names. This change makes the name consistent, and unsurprising for developers. Mirrors `DestroyAction` (verb).
Currently, there's a mix of accessing node_stack_ both directly and indirectly, and there are already several Push/Pop methods to help wrap the behavior. However, there's also direct access because of shifting over time, as well as variations in _how_ the stack is used.
This migrates to a separate class in order to make a more specific contract for the API. It cleans up existing uses and adds APIs where needed.
This somewhat abuses control-flow macro handling in `clang-format` to get the behavior we want. Fortunately, I don't think we're ever likely to want this for its intended purpose so it seems harmless to co-opt it like this. If we really wanted, we can narrow it to `if`-macros, but I picked the simpler option to start.
FWIW, I tried all the other macro formatting special cases to see if one would work but it didn't. Might be worth filing a feature request to get a `TypeDefinitionMacros` setting to compliment `TypenameMacros` and format like this does, but it seems (very) low priority.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Richard Smith
Calvin
Adrien Leravat
Carson Radtke
