`FindIfOrNull` returns a pointer to the element in the range if it's
found, and nullptr otherwise. `FindIfOrNone` returns a copy of the
element in the range if it's found, and `T::None` (for a range of
elements of type `T`) otherwise. `Contains` returns a bool indicating
whether the element in the range is found.
These functions replace `llvm::find()` and `llvm::find_if()` when you
want a single answer back instead of an iterator. This avoids the need
to check against `end()`, allowing the return condition to be tested as
a standard bool.
We replace uses of `find()` and `find_if()` that did not require an
iterator with these new helpers.
Note that the return type of `FindIfOrNull` is a pointer since we can
not write `optional<T&>`, which must be tested for null. If the null
check is omitted, UB occurs and the resulting code may end up with an
incorrect pointer (https://crbug.com/40153300) into the range (or
elsewhere), rather than a null dereference. And this would be very
confusing to debug. Hopefully debug builds and sanitizers keep this from
being an issue we sink a bunch of time into debugging.
Disables three new warnings because they lean more towards style
conflicts than fixes. I've brought these up on #style.
Other than that, mostly fixing basic issues, and things that
clang-tidy-20 seems to fire where clang-tiday-16 didn't. One particular
curious case is `llvm::StringLiteral::data()` uses, which are flagged as
not strictly null-terminated; I'm switching to `const char*` in those
spots which matches `llvm::formatv`'s format argument, but feels worse.
I'm removing `run_clang_tidy.py` here because I'm observing it give
fewer warnings than `bazel build --config=clang-tidy -k
//toolchain/...`. The latter matches how we enforce in GitHub actions
(and also caches results, and suppresses output for files that have no
issues), so I'm dropping the bespoke script.
This is essentially the result of looking at `.begin()` uses. We also
frequently do `std::shuffle`, but unfortunately STLExtras doesn't
provide a wrapper for that.
This refactors the diagnostic kind coverage check into something that
also works for node kinds. Then, since this points out a few node kinds
that aren't having their parse verified, I'm adding minor tests for
those.
Dana Jansens
Jon Ross-Perkins