This converts `StructTypeField` from an instruction to a dedicated type,
with its own store. This had originated from discussing how
`.GetAs<SemIR::StructTypeField>` was more prevalent than for other
instructions, but is probably more interesting for the storage savings
(16 bytes StructTypeField + 4 byte LocId + 4 byte InstId -> 8 byte
StructTypeField).
Due to the different structure, these now have their own stack during
construction, reducing (but not eliminating) `args_type_info_stack_`
use-cases.
The test changes of different InstIds is expected because structs and
classes generate fewer instructions now. Other than that, results should
remain the same.
I'm generally trying to avoid unrelated cleanup here due to the PR size,
though I did scrutinize the `VerifyOnFinish` calls, adding one and
commenting others (putting them in member order because that's how I was
checking what was verified and what wasn't).
The cehck for vptr could be done differently (is this class dynamic and
its base class non-dynamic), and if we change the layout (to put the
vptr after any base) then this code will break (could add an assertion
that the vptr isn't present apart from at the start of the field list if
that'd seem worthwhile).
There's still later issues with lowering (if this patch causes crashes
in lowering, do they result in fuzz failures/need to be avoided before
this change is submitted?)
When an instruction is created as part of an implicit call to an
interface member, we generated a bunch of constants for naming the
interface, finding the corresponding specific, accessing its member
function, and so on. This led to significant bloat in SemIR.
Instead, we now track whether an instruction is created implicitly in
its location, and where relevant, we use the constant value of the
instruction directly instead of storing a new `Inst`.
This doesn't reduce the amount of work we need to do, but does make the
representation in SemIR smaller and more readable.
This instruction represents integer values, whether they come from
literals or calculations, so it the old name is inaccurate. I also plan
to rename `BigInt` to `IntLiteral` based on recent discussion and this
change aims to avoid confusion stemming from the same name being used
for two different things.
I'm not renaming `FloatLiteral` because recent discussion suggests we
may want distinct `FloatLiteral` versus `FloatValue` representations in
SemIR.
This is in particular to avoid churn from changes such as #4370. I think
the import list can be helpful (particularly to understand what the
library is aware of), but it's a different trade-off for the prelude
package due to the implicit imports.
This PR makes it so that types can implement the `IndexWith` interface
so that they can provide their custom indexing behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Also surround it in square brackets rather than parentheses. This
matches the format used by Clang and GCC, and means diagnostics will
still match the `file:line:col: error: ` pattern used by some IDE tools.
Before:
```console
fail_builtins.carbon:11:11: error(AliasRequiresNameRef): alias initializer must be a name reference
```
After:
```console
fail_builtins.carbon:11:11: error: alias initializer must be a name reference [AliasRequiresNameRef]
```
Also tighten up test regex to only match on `STDERR` lines that list a
file name.
Use the diagnostic kind printing in #4425 to catch when we have
diagnostics with no tests.
This merges a couple other use-cases of filegroup manifests into a
common rule.
Note I do add a few tests for things, and also some things are
_actually_ unit tested (just not in the file_test structure). But I
stopped when I realized that dealing with merge conflicts is going to be
a pain. I might end up reverting test changes (as part of merge conflict
resolution) and doing narrow test additions in a separate PR, after both
this and #4425 are merged.
- Generate runtime indices as part of pattern matching, rather than as a
separate postprocessing/rewriting step.
- In contexts where runtime parameters aren't permitted, avoid emitting
insts for them to begin with, rather than trying to detect the problem
and rewrite the IR to remove them later on.
This is to help identify which diagnostics we're actually using.
Note that driver/testdata still has tests which don't pass this flag,
and so continue to test the kind-less (default) behavior.
Distinguish between deduction against a symbolic binding pattern and
deduction against a symbolic binding name. In the former case, the value
is being explicitly specified and must be constant. In the latter case
we encountered a use of the binding name as a subexpression, and should
deduce against it if it's not explicitly specified.
I'm taking the approach of making DiagnosticBase an API so that we can
pass similar diagnostics as parameters. An alternative would be to do
the function_ref approach we've done elsewhere, but these felt more
boilerplate to me.
Note I'm also modifying messages here. Let me know if you'd like
different changes and/or just keeping current formatting (keeping
current formatting would also allow removing some of the templating I've
added, but it felt helpful putting explicit tokens where possible). But
also, things like "`protected` not allowed on `interface` declaration at
file scope" were part of the phrasing issue, I think.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Per discussion on #toolchain, add "s" as a special-case for the common
plural format.
Note this removes periods from a few diagnostics; the periods shouldn't
be there per message style. Also, while I'm ignoring llvm::StringLiteral
uses, those should be addressed as #4416 -- this'll probably conflict
and make me clean up one or the other.
Building on https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/4411,
replace format_provider uses (other than `TokenKind`, which is more on
the okay side of things)
Also does some edits to `ClassMemberDefinition` to try to better match
diagnostic style
A small step to virtual functions - adding vtable pointers to the
layout, but not initializing or otherwise using them at this stage.
A few open design questions I'd love feedback on:
* Is this the right/good enough SemIR representation for now? This patch
adds a `is_dynamic` attribute to `SemIR::Class` and populates/flags it
based on the flag of the base class, or if any virtual function is
declared in the class (or, at least that's my intent). Some other
options include:
* Each `Class` could store a `ClassId` (or `TypeId`?) of the (possibly
indirect, possibly self) base class that is the first one that is
dynamic/has a vtable pointer
* Could make the property narrower, like `has vtable pointer` and have
it `true` only on the type that introduces the vtable - then derived
classes would have to walk their base classes to check if they're the
one that needs to define the vtable pointer or not
* Should the vtable be the first element in the type? If there's a
non-dynamic base type, we could have a layout that's `{<non-dynamic base
type>, vtable ptr, <derived members>}`? Derived types would still be
able to uniquely identify where their vtable pointer is just fine... -
and the vtable pointer is, in a sense, a member of that intermediate
type, so it does seem a bit strange to force it to the front - but I
guess it's probably more efficient in some ways?
Open to any other suggestions/advice/thoughts on the direction, etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Also propagate the pattern IR along with the pattern-match IR, and use
it where appropriate.
Strictly speaking, some parts of the pattern-match IR are allocated
eagerly, while traversing the pattern's parse tree, but they still
aren't actually emitted until we traverse the associated pattern insts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
A good first-pass, at least. (abstract adapters are rejected with this
change, though pending further language design discussion)
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Add a new `specific_function` instruction that represents a generic
function plus its deduced argument list as a callee in a function call.
The new instruction can only appear as the immediate operand of a call
instruction, so we give it a builtin placeholder type.
At the end of each file, require definitions for all specific functions
used in that file. Resolve the generic with the argument list to produce
those specific function definitions as needed, and diagnose if the
generic doesn't have a definition available.
A few tests are updated in cases where they declared and used generic
functions but didn't previously provide a function definition.
The locations point to the first instruction in the generic that needed
the relevant constant value or type.
For now, this must makes the formatted SemIR a bit more useful, but in
the future it will also provide locations for diagnostics caused by
monomorphization failure.
Not sure about error recovery options - can/should we drop the
definition as a means of recovery when building the SemIR? I guess
probably not, so I guess this change is about right.
Phrasing of the error message I'm certainly open to.
According to
https://docs.carbon-lang.dev/docs/design/generics/details.html#adapting-types:
> You can add any declaration that you could add to a class except for
declarations that would change the representation of the type. This
means you can add methods, functions, interface implementations, and
aliases, but not fields, base classes, or virtual functions. The
specific implementations of virtual functions are part of the type
representation, and so no virtual functions may be overridden in an
adapter either.
So, let's check/reject that.
Checking at the end of the class ensures that no matter the order of
methods and adapt statements, the issue will still be correctly
diagnosed.
Introduces the `BindingPattern` and `SymbolicBindingPattern` insts, and
a separate stack of pattern blocks that they are emitted into. The
intent is to generate the corresponding pattern-matching insts (like
`BindName`) from them in a separate pass, but that is deferred to future
PRs.
See
[here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U_vQH17V893J9aF1LJXUnFYBNSs2MjKl4bJPaWCB2zo/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-w0xGYZ0An31Kpz-wvzSXwQ)
for the design this is based on, but note that during review we have
chosen to deviate from that design by putting the patterns in separate
blocks, and omitting the "forward references" from a `BindingPattern` to
its corresponding `BindName`. This in turn necessitates having separate
inst kinds for symbolic and non-symbolic binding patterns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Omit the `note: ` prefix and the snippet from the "in import" note that
precedes a diagnostic.
This makes our diagnostic output more closely match that of Clang and
GCC.
Doing this to a couple of diagnostics was suggested in review comments
on #4320, so I've applied the suggestions across the whole file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This is a primarily automated change:
- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
- `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
- `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
- ERROR -> error
- WARNING -> warning
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Add support for initializing types like `GenericClass(i32)` from a
struct literal. A new kind of instruction, `complete_type_witness`, is
added to the class definition to track the object representation type so
that it's visible to the generics machinery. Accesses to the object
representation of a class have all been updated to pass in the class's
`SpecificId` so that the types of the fields of the specific class are
used instead of the types of the fields of the generic class in places
that look at the object representation -- primarily class
initialization.
This change accomplishes the TODOs for access checking. More
specifically it,
- makes `SemIR::AccessKind` formattable using `llvm::formatv`.
- makes use of `LookupUnqualifiedName` to find `Self`.
Instead of the `call` instruction having a block with one argument per
explicit argument, preceded optionally by `self` and followed optionally
by a return slot, change the `call` to store only the *runtime*
arguments. Store an index on the runtime parameters to make it easier to
determine the correspondence between arguments and parameters in a call.
Compile-time parameters, whether implicit or explicit, are no longer
included in the call argument list. Instead, they're tracked only in the
`specific_id` on the callee.
For calls to generic classes and generic interfaces, it no longer makes
sense to form a `call` instruction, given that the entirety of the
result is determined by the `specific_id`, which is now formed when
checking the call. Instead, the `call` instruction now only models
function calls, and not calls to other kinds of parameterized entity
names, and we create a `class_type` or `interface_type` instead of a
`call` instruction to model these kinds of calls. Notionally the model
here is that we're following the #3720 approach for calls, but for now
we inline the `Call.Op` function when forming SemIR.
We now also track the enclosing specific for a generic class or generic
interface that appears within an enclosing generic. This is necessary in
order for deduction of the inner generic parameters to not get confused
by the outer generic parameters being absent.
In order to not regress diagnostics, the template argument deduction
mechanism has been extended to specify the name of the parameter we're
deducing against when possible, and call arity mismatch errors are now
diagnosed before performing deduction rather than afterwards.
Applies #4278 TEST_NAME substitution to tests. Note I've tried to
structure commits as:
1. Do all the replacements.
2. autoupdate (nothing else) -- this shows incorrect updates.
3. Fix up manually, including autoupdates to get back to original
output.
I guess this technically would also allow code to pass check that hasn't
before, and that isn't covered by tests (since it's masked by other
failures in the tests that already test this functionality) - should I
add another test/add some code to a valid test case?
Also, this'll miscompile in lowering, since there's no support there yet
- should I do anything about that to make lowering fail in some way? Or
is it acceptable that some things just silently mis-lower? (I could add
a currently-miscompiling test case too, to demonstrate this? (not sure
if the autogenerated tests leave space for comments that would explain
that the currently-tested behavior is incorrect?))
Is the addition to EntityWithParamsBase suitable? of course not all
functions can be virtual, so it's a wasted bit at the moment for all
those cases (though it's free, since it's bitpacked - but as we want to
add more bits in there it might not be a scalable solution)?
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Add these interfaces to the core library. For now, they're two separate
interfaces because we don't yet support one interface extending another.
This collapses a lot of the layering in check: for example, the call
building logic depends on implicit conversions, conversions now depend
on the overloaded operator machinery, and that machinery depends on
building calls.
In passing, improve the diagnostics for failing to find a name required
from the prelude. Also convert all the transitively-called code from
`NodeId` to `LocId` given the latter is what the conversion machinery
has available.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Support for types (particularly classes) is left as a TODO.
There's also an issue I'm observing with a "define in impl" test, but
this is probably an issue with resolving the prior declaration which is
imported indirectly. The PR was already feeling big, so I'm choosing to
cut here.
Note, this does not implement the rule "The owning library's API file
must import the `extern` declaration, and must also contain a
declaration."
This avoids import cycles, and reduces the number of temporary vectors
we build (and potentially throw away on retry). Import the self specific
when importing a generic, now that there's no risk that will introduce
cycles.
Note that we could take the same approach to import classes, interfaces,
and so on, instead of the current third phase of resolution for those
instructions, but in this PR I'm just addressing the import cycle I'm
currently seeing in a work-in-progress PR.
TryEvalInst was assuming this to be the case when forming canonical
constants, but it previously wasn't.
This fixes an issue where we can end up with two identical-looking
constants for an empty struct value: one with an `Empty` block and
another with the canonical empty block.
Jon Ross-Perkins
David Blaikie
Richard Smith
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins
Brymer MenesesandJon Ross-Perkins
josh11bandJosh L