Reject abstract function definitions (#4350)

Not sure about error recovery options - can/should we drop the
definition as a means of recovery when building the SemIR? I guess
probably not, so I guess this change is about right.

Phrasing of the error message I'm certainly open to.
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie
2024-10-03 22:50:46 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent 8f547365f5
commit eab5dd6112
3 changed files with 59 additions and 3 deletions
+10
View File
@@ -299,6 +299,16 @@ static auto BuildFunctionDecl(Context& context,
// Write the function ID into the FunctionDecl.
context.ReplaceInstBeforeConstantUse(decl_id, function_decl);
// Diagnose 'definition of `abstract` function' using the canonical Function's
// modifiers.
if (is_definition &&
context.functions().Get(function_decl.function_id).virtual_modifier ==
SemIR::Function::VirtualModifier::Abstract) {
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(DefinedAbstractFunction, Error,
"definition of `abstract` function");
context.emitter().Emit(TokenOnly(node_id), DefinedAbstractFunction);
}
// Check if we need to add this to name lookup, now that the function decl is
// done.
if (!name_context.prev_inst_id().is_valid()) {
+48 -3
View File
@@ -61,14 +61,29 @@ protected virtual base class Virtual {}
// CHECK:STDERR:
abstract protected class WrongOrder;
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+6]]:10: error: `base` not allowed on declaration with `abstract`
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+7]]:10: error: `base` not allowed on declaration with `abstract`
// CHECK:STDERR: abstract base class AbstractAndBase {}
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+3]]:1: note: `abstract` previously appeared here
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:1: note: `abstract` previously appeared here
// CHECK:STDERR: abstract base class AbstractAndBase {}
// CHECK:STDERR: ^~~~~~~~
// CHECK:STDERR:
abstract base class AbstractAndBase {}
abstract class AbstractWithDefinition {
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+4]]:19: error: definition of `abstract` function
// CHECK:STDERR: abstract fn F() {}
// CHECK:STDERR: ^
// CHECK:STDERR:
abstract fn F() {}
abstract fn G();
}
// CHECK:STDERR: fail_modifiers.carbon:[[@LINE+3]]:31: error: definition of `abstract` function
// CHECK:STDERR: fn AbstractWithDefinition.G() {
// CHECK:STDERR: ^
fn AbstractWithDefinition.G() {
}
// CHECK:STDOUT: --- fail_modifiers.carbon
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: constants {
@@ -80,6 +95,12 @@ abstract base class AbstractAndBase {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %Virtual: type = class_type @Virtual [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder: type = class_type @WrongOrder [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %AbstractAndBase: type = class_type @AbstractAndBase [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %AbstractWithDefinition: type = class_type @AbstractWithDefinition [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %F.type: type = fn_type @F [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %.3: type = tuple_type () [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %F: %F.type = struct_value () [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %G.type: type = fn_type @G [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %G: %G.type = struct_value () [template]
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: imports {
@@ -104,6 +125,7 @@ abstract base class AbstractAndBase {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: .Virtual = %Virtual.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .WrongOrder = %WrongOrder.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .AbstractAndBase = %AbstractAndBase.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .AbstractWithDefinition = %AbstractWithDefinition.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT: %Core.import = import Core
// CHECK:STDOUT: %DuplicatePrivate.decl: type = class_decl @DuplicatePrivate [template = constants.%DuplicatePrivate] {} {}
@@ -112,6 +134,8 @@ abstract base class AbstractAndBase {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %Virtual.decl: type = class_decl @Virtual [template = constants.%Virtual] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %WrongOrder.decl: type = class_decl @WrongOrder [template = constants.%WrongOrder] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %AbstractAndBase.decl: type = class_decl @AbstractAndBase [template = constants.%AbstractAndBase] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %AbstractWithDefinition.decl: type = class_decl @AbstractWithDefinition [template = constants.%AbstractWithDefinition] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %G.decl: %G.type = fn_decl @G [template = constants.%G] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: class @DuplicatePrivate;
@@ -135,9 +159,30 @@ abstract base class AbstractAndBase {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: class @WrongOrder;
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: class @AbstractAndBase {
// CHECK:STDOUT: %.loc70: <witness> = complete_type_witness %.1 [template = constants.%.2]
// CHECK:STDOUT: %.loc71: <witness> = complete_type_witness %.1 [template = constants.%.2]
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: !members:
// CHECK:STDOUT: .Self = constants.%AbstractAndBase
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: class @AbstractWithDefinition {
// CHECK:STDOUT: %F.decl: %F.type = fn_decl @F [template = constants.%F] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %G.decl: %G.type = fn_decl @G [template = constants.%G] {} {}
// CHECK:STDOUT: %.loc80: <witness> = complete_type_witness %.1 [template = constants.%.2]
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: !members:
// CHECK:STDOUT: .Self = constants.%AbstractWithDefinition
// CHECK:STDOUT: .F = %F.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: .G = %G.decl
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: abstract fn @F() {
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
// CHECK:STDOUT: abstract fn @G() {
// CHECK:STDOUT: !entry:
// CHECK:STDOUT: return
// CHECK:STDOUT: }
// CHECK:STDOUT:
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC_KIND(MissingObjectInMethodCall)
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC_KIND(SelfParameterNotAllowed)
// Function declaration checking.
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC_KIND(DefinedAbstractFunction)
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC_KIND(FunctionRedeclReturnTypeDiffers)
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC_KIND(FunctionRedeclReturnTypeDiffersNoReturn)
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC_KIND(FunctionRedeclReturnTypePrevious)