carbon-language/carbon-lang
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git synced 2026-09-24 20:20:10 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Fix links from proposals to open discussion minutes (#1048)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
josh11b
2022-01-27 11:54:19 -08:00
committed by GitHub
parent eda43faa5a
commit 3313f6fa9c
4 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
proposals/p0920.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -354,5 +354,5 @@ deduced? In particular we were worried about evolution, and allowing users to
add functions to an interface as long as they had defaults.
These problems were discussed in
[2021-12-08 open discussion](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRrhRrmaUf2hVi2lFcHsYo2j0jI6t9RGZoYjWhRxp14/edit?resourcekey=0-xWHBEZ8zIqnJiB4yfBSLfA#heading=h.njnqpdcjp5h0).
[2021-12-08 open discussion](https://docs.google.com/document/d/105GsfmxOwcZ_iHkCXFnALB7e-_R3IgMpGKfeT84h1mc/edit?resourcekey=0-h3uVHObsJwChVg1MdaWfKQ#heading=h.njnqpdcjp5h0).
We concluded that we will later find other mechanisms to support this use case.
proposals/p0950.md
+2 -2
View File
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ This design was the conclusion of a number of discussions and proposals:
[Member lookup in generic and non-generic contexts](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-vw39x5YARpUZ0uD2xmKepLEKG7_u122CUJ67hNz3hk/edit#)
- Nov 4, 2021 document by `josh11b` and `mconst` titled
[Carbon: facets exposed from generics](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C1eIzd6JY0ooE1rDjW1vx7e3i7sgGugCA9bPMRhwWM0/edit#)
- [Open discussion on 2021-11-08](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRrhRrmaUf2hVi2lFcHsYo2j0jI6t9RGZoYjWhRxp14/edit?resourcekey=0-xWHBEZ8zIqnJiB4yfBSLfA#heading=h.ec285oam2okw)
- [Open discussion 2021-11-11](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRrhRrmaUf2hVi2lFcHsYo2j0jI6t9RGZoYjWhRxp14/edit?resourcekey=0-xWHBEZ8zIqnJiB4yfBSLfA#heading=h.8vuatm82d1mk)
- [Open discussion on 2021-11-08](https://docs.google.com/document/d/105GsfmxOwcZ_iHkCXFnALB7e-_R3IgMpGKfeT84h1mc/edit?resourcekey=0-h3uVHObsJwChVg1MdaWfKQ#heading=h.ec285oam2okw)
- [Open discussion 2021-11-11](https://docs.google.com/document/d/105GsfmxOwcZ_iHkCXFnALB7e-_R3IgMpGKfeT84h1mc/edit?resourcekey=0-h3uVHObsJwChVg1MdaWfKQ#heading=h.8vuatm82d1mk)
The main alternatives we evaluated are summarized below.
proposals/p0981.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ This proposal advances Carbon's goals:
Alternatives were considered in:
- [question-for-leads issue #710: Default comparison for data classes](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/issues/710)
- [open discussion on 2021-11-29](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRrhRrmaUf2hVi2lFcHsYo2j0jI6t9RGZoYjWhRxp14/edit?resourcekey=0-xWHBEZ8zIqnJiB4yfBSLfA#heading=h.6komy889g3hc)
- [open discussion on 2021-11-29](https://docs.google.com/document/d/105GsfmxOwcZ_iHkCXFnALB7e-_R3IgMpGKfeT84h1mc/edit?resourcekey=0-h3uVHObsJwChVg1MdaWfKQ#heading=h.6komy889g3hc)
### Field order is not significant
proposals/p0983.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -164,5 +164,5 @@ as we determined there was a need for the greater expressivity of being able to
mark individual items as `final`. This discussion occurred in:
- [Document examining an extended example using specialization](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w-kRC338Jc1ibTu7Vf0pOlGKdrpumfz63bzUIxEj9jY/edit)
- [2021-11-29 open discussion](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRrhRrmaUf2hVi2lFcHsYo2j0jI6t9RGZoYjWhRxp14/edit?resourcekey=0-xWHBEZ8zIqnJiB4yfBSLfA#heading=h.6komy889g3hc)
- [2021-11-29 open discussion](https://docs.google.com/document/d/105GsfmxOwcZ_iHkCXFnALB7e-_R3IgMpGKfeT84h1mc/edit?resourcekey=0-h3uVHObsJwChVg1MdaWfKQ#heading=h.6komy889g3hc)
- [Carbon's #typesystem channel on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/708431657849585705/910681126236987495)