mirror of
https://github.com/calibrain/shelfmark.git
synced 2026-10-02 18:25:46 +01:00
Advanced title search, advanced title+author search, and the title typeahead returned zero results every time, and the sort fallback added in #1183 blamed the sort value for it. Hardcover turns the `fields` search parameter into Typesense's `query_by` but keeps `num_typos` and `query_by_weights` as fixed-length presets per query_type. For query_type=Book the preset expects exactly five fields, so a shorter list is not searched loosely - the whole search is rejected with a null results body. Confirmed against the live API: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 fields are all rejected, only 5 works, and weights must match one-for-one when sent. Every Book-type list we sent was the wrong length - the title typeahead and advanced title search sent 2, title+author sent 3. - Send BOOK_SEARCH_FIELDS (the full five) for every narrowed Book search and express the intent through weights instead. Weights only bias ranking - a field weighted 0 still matches - so a title search now ranks titles first rather than restricting to them. That is the closest behaviour Hardcover still allows, and there is no client-side filter to restore the old precision. - Pin the field and weight counts in tests, since the failure mode is a silent zero results rather than an error. The sort fallback from #1183 also misread these rejections: - Select the `error` field on every search and log Hardcover's own explanation. The reason is only ever in that sibling field, so a rejection surfaced as "returned no result body" with nothing to act on. Reading it is what made the field-count rule findable. - Drop `sort` entirely on the retry instead of sending an empty string. An empty sort is a value like any other and can be rejected too. - Arm the 900s sticky window only after the sortless retry succeeds. It was armed before the retry and never rolled back, so one rejected typeahead disabled sorting process-wide for 15 minutes whatever the actual cause. Verified against the live Hardcover API: advanced title search 0 -> 84 results, title+author 0 -> 139, title typeahead 0 -> 84 with the exact title top. 2566 unit tests pass; ruff, basedpyright and vulture clean. Refs #1183. The sort_by regression #1183 was written for is gone from Hardcover's side - every sort value it rejected, including the one in the report, is accepted again today. Two plain-search rejections in that report (fields=None) remain unexplained: they could not be reproduced under any per_page, page depth, sort value or query shape, and are most likely transient upstream. They now self-report the reason if they recur.