json/tests/src/fuzzer-parse_bjdata.cpp

//     __ _____ _____ _____
//  __|  |   __|     |   | |  JSON for Modern C++ (supporting code)
// |  |  |__   |  |  | | | |  version 3.12.0
// |_____|_____|_____|_|___|  https://github.com/nlohmann/json
//
// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2013-2026 Niels Lohmann <https://nlohmann.me>
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

/*
This file implements a parser test suitable for fuzz testing. Given a byte
array data, it performs the following steps:

- j1 = from_bjdata(data)
- vec = to_bjdata(j1)
- j2 = from_bjdata(vec)
- assert(j1 == j2)
- vec2 = to_bjdata(j1, use_size = true, use_type = false)
- j3 = from_bjdata(vec2)
- assert(j1 == j3)
- vec3 = to_bjdata(j1, use_size = true, use_type = true)
- j4 = from_bjdata(vec3)
- assert(j1 == j4)

Re-serializing j2/j3/j4 with the same use_size/use_type settings is checked
for value-stability rather than byte-exact stability: from_bjdata(to_bjdata(j2))
must equal j2 (and likewise for j3, j4). Byte-exact stability does not hold in
general, because a BJData value can lose type fidelity across a round trip
(e.g. a binary_t value serialized without the optimized "$U#" array header is
parsed back as a plain array of numbers, see #5398 and the discussion on
PR #5494) - the numeric value is preserved, but the writer's smallest-type
selection for the now-plain numbers may legitimately pick a different, but
equally valid, single-byte type marker than the dedicated binary-data writer
would have. Both encodings are valid BJData and both decode to the same
value, so this is not treated as a round-trip failure here.

"Value-stable" is checked by comparing dump()s rather than with operator==
directly: a BJData/UBJSON payload can decode to a non-finite double (NaN or
+-Infinity), and IEEE 754 NaN is never equal to itself, so operator== would
report two structurally-identical trees as different whenever a NaN is
involved -- not a round-trip bug, just NaN's ordinary (non-)reflexivity.
dump() serializes any non-finite double the same deterministic way (as JSON
`null`, since JSON itself cannot represent NaN/Infinity), so comparing
dumps is stable under exactly the same values that break operator==.

The unit tests run the same checks on a fixed corpus (see the "BJData round-trip
invariants" test case), so keep both in sync.

The provided function `LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput` can be used in different fuzzer
drivers.
*/

#include <cassert>
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <nlohmann/json.hpp>

// the round-trip checks below are assertions; NDEBUG would compile them away
#ifdef NDEBUG
    #error "the fuzzer drivers must be built without NDEBUG"
#endif

using json = nlohmann::json;

// value-stable comparison for the round-trip checks below; see the note
// above on why this compares dump()s rather than the json values directly
static bool is_value_stable(const json& lhs, const json& rhs)
{
    return lhs.dump() == rhs.dump();
}

// see http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html
extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t* data, size_t size)
{
    try
    {
        // step 1: parse input
        std::vector<uint8_t> const vec1(data, data + size);
        json const j1 = json::from_bjdata(vec1);

        try
        {
            // step 2.1: round trip without adding size annotations to container types
            std::vector<uint8_t> const vec2 = json::to_bjdata(j1, false, false);

            // step 2.2: round trip with adding size annotations but without adding type annotations to container types
            std::vector<uint8_t> const vec3 = json::to_bjdata(j1, true, false);

            // step 2.3: round trip with adding size as well as type annotations to container types
            std::vector<uint8_t> const vec4 = json::to_bjdata(j1, true, true);

            // parse serialization
            json const j2 = json::from_bjdata(vec2);
            json const j3 = json::from_bjdata(vec3);
            json const j4 = json::from_bjdata(vec4);

            // re-serializing must be value-stable (see the notes above on
            // why byte-exact stability is not guaranteed in general, and
            // why this compares dump()s rather than the values directly)
            assert(is_value_stable(json::from_bjdata(json::to_bjdata(j2, false, false)), j2));
            assert(is_value_stable(json::from_bjdata(json::to_bjdata(j3, true, false)), j3));
            assert(is_value_stable(json::from_bjdata(json::to_bjdata(j4, true, true)), j4));
        }
        catch (const json::parse_error&)
        {
            // parsing a BJData serialization must not fail
            assert(false);
        }
    }
    catch (const json::parse_error&)
    {
        // parse errors are ok, because input may be random bytes
    }
    catch (const json::type_error&)
    {
        // type errors can occur during parsing, too
    }
    catch (const json::out_of_range&)
    {
        // out of range errors may happen if provided sizes are excessive
    }

    // return 0 - non-zero return values are reserved for future use
    return 0;
}