Files
carbon-lang/executable_semantics/testdata/experimental_continuation/fail_continuation_syntax.carbon
T
Jon Meow bbd4940e6d Be more explicit about AST types (#921)
This was born out of wanting FunctionDeclaration to explicitly have a Block for a body, and became a bit more of specifying types around. Note this forces exec_program to generate a Block for print()'s body, which is probably more correct as now we can expect a standard FunctionDeclaration AST structure, even for the built-ins.

There is a syntactic change here: a continuation's body is now a Block, not just a Statement. I've added an example disallowed test case. I think this is more reasonable syntax.

Other than that, note that optional_else now generates a valid Block. This has me thinking about whether we can eliminate Sequence, but that seemed well out of scope for this.
2021-10-28 13:54:45 -07:00

20 lines
789 B
Plaintext

// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
// RUN: not executable_semantics %s 2>&1 | \
// RUN: FileCheck --match-full-lines --allow-unused-prefixes=false %s
// RUN: not executable_semantics --trace %s 2>&1 | \
// RUN: FileCheck --match-full-lines --allow-unused-prefixes %s
// AUTOUPDATE: executable_semantics %s
// CHECK: COMPILATION ERROR: {{.*}}/executable_semantics/testdata/experimental_continuation/fail_continuation_syntax.carbon:16: syntax error, unexpected identifier, expecting LEFT_CURLY_BRACE
package ExecutableSemanticsTest api;
fn main() -> i32 {
var x: i32 = 0;
__continuation k x = 3;
__run k;
return x;
}