Richard Smith 8b59e85b16 Add support for inline Cpp declarations. (#6994) ...

For #6830, add support for inline C++ fragments as a declaration rather
than as a packaging directive. For now, this uses `inline Cpp
<string-literal>;` as syntax. The prior `import Cpp inline
<string-literal>;` is left alone for the time being. We can decide
separately whether to remove that.

`inline Cpp` requires that there was at least one `import Cpp`. It's not
clear to me if that's the right design long-term, but it seems
reasonable for now.

Assisted-by: Gemini via Google Antigravity

2026-03-31 22:27:43 +00:00

..

function.carbon

Add support for inline Cpp declarations. (#6994)

2026-03-31 22:27:43 +00:00

mangle_type.carbon

Reverse Interop: Class declarations (#6955)

2026-03-25 04:50:08 +00:00