mirror of
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git
synced 2026-09-24 21:30:12 +01:00
Every test that used `addr` before #6283 should be using `ref` after this PR. In most cases that was done in #6283, but this PR transitions a few that I missed in that first pass. In addition, #6283 cloned the old `addr` tests from `foo.carbon` to `foo_addr.carbon` in order to maintain test coverage during the transition; this PR removes those cloned tests.
537 lines
22 KiB
C++
537 lines
22 KiB
C++
// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
|
|
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
|
|
#include "toolchain/check/merge.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "toolchain/base/kind_switch.h"
|
|
#include "toolchain/check/import.h"
|
|
#include "toolchain/check/import_ref.h"
|
|
#include "toolchain/diagnostics/format_providers.h"
|
|
#include "toolchain/sem_ir/ids.h"
|
|
#include "toolchain/sem_ir/typed_insts.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace Carbon::Check {
|
|
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclPrevDecl, Note, "previously declared here");
|
|
|
|
// Diagnoses a redeclaration which is redundant.
|
|
static auto DiagnoseRedundant(Context& context, Lex::TokenKind decl_kind,
|
|
SemIR::NameId name_id, SemIR::LocId new_loc_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId prev_loc_id) -> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclRedundant, Error,
|
|
"redeclaration of `{0} {1}` is redundant", Lex::TokenKind,
|
|
SemIR::NameId);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_loc_id, RedeclRedundant, decl_kind, name_id)
|
|
.Note(prev_loc_id, RedeclPrevDecl)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Diagnoses a redefinition.
|
|
static auto DiagnoseRedef(Context& context, Lex::TokenKind decl_kind,
|
|
SemIR::NameId name_id, SemIR::LocId new_loc_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId prev_loc_id) -> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclRedef, Error, "redefinition of `{0} {1}`",
|
|
Lex::TokenKind, SemIR::NameId);
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclPrevDef, Note, "previously defined here");
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_loc_id, RedeclRedef, decl_kind, name_id)
|
|
.Note(prev_loc_id, RedeclPrevDef)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Diagnoses an `extern` versus non-`extern` mismatch.
|
|
static auto DiagnoseExternMismatch(Context& context, Lex::TokenKind decl_kind,
|
|
SemIR::NameId name_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId new_loc_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId prev_loc_id) -> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclExternMismatch, Error,
|
|
"redeclarations of `{0} {1}` must match use of `extern`",
|
|
Lex::TokenKind, SemIR::NameId);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_loc_id, RedeclExternMismatch, decl_kind, name_id)
|
|
.Note(prev_loc_id, RedeclPrevDecl)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Diagnoses `extern library` declared in a library importing the owned entity.
|
|
static auto DiagnoseExternLibraryInImporter(Context& context,
|
|
Lex::TokenKind decl_kind,
|
|
SemIR::NameId name_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId new_loc_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId prev_loc_id) -> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(ExternLibraryInImporter, Error,
|
|
"cannot declare imported `{0} {1}` as `extern library`",
|
|
Lex::TokenKind, SemIR::NameId);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_loc_id, ExternLibraryInImporter, decl_kind, name_id)
|
|
.Note(prev_loc_id, RedeclPrevDecl)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Diagnoses `extern library` pointing to the wrong library.
|
|
static auto DiagnoseExternLibraryIncorrect(Context& context,
|
|
SemIR::LocId new_loc_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId prev_loc_id) -> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(
|
|
ExternLibraryIncorrect, Error,
|
|
"declaration in {0} doesn't match `extern library` declaration",
|
|
SemIR::LibraryNameId);
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(ExternLibraryExpected, Note,
|
|
"previously declared with `extern library` here");
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_loc_id, ExternLibraryIncorrect, context.sem_ir().library_id())
|
|
.Note(prev_loc_id, ExternLibraryExpected)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto DiagnoseExternRequiresDeclInApiFile(Context& context, SemIR::LocId loc_id)
|
|
-> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(
|
|
ExternRequiresDeclInApiFile, Error,
|
|
"`extern` entities must have a declaration in the API file");
|
|
context.emitter().Emit(loc_id, ExternRequiresDeclInApiFile);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto DiagnoseIfInvalidRedecl(Context& context, Lex::TokenKind decl_kind,
|
|
SemIR::NameId name_id, RedeclInfo new_decl,
|
|
RedeclInfo prev_decl,
|
|
SemIR::ImportIRId import_ir_id) -> void {
|
|
if (!import_ir_id.has_value()) {
|
|
// Check for disallowed redeclarations in the same file.
|
|
if (!new_decl.is_definition) {
|
|
DiagnoseRedundant(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (prev_decl.is_definition) {
|
|
DiagnoseRedef(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (prev_decl.is_extern != new_decl.is_extern) {
|
|
DiagnoseExternMismatch(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (import_ir_id == SemIR::ImportIRId::ApiForImpl) {
|
|
// Check for disallowed redeclarations in the same library. Note that a
|
|
// forward declaration in the impl is allowed.
|
|
if (prev_decl.is_definition) {
|
|
if (new_decl.is_definition) {
|
|
DiagnoseRedef(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
} else {
|
|
DiagnoseRedundant(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
}
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (prev_decl.is_extern != new_decl.is_extern) {
|
|
DiagnoseExternMismatch(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check for disallowed redeclarations cross-library.
|
|
if (new_decl.is_extern && context.sem_ir().is_impl()) {
|
|
// We continue after issuing the "missing API declaration" diagnostic,
|
|
// because it may still be helpful to note other issues with the
|
|
// declarations.
|
|
DiagnoseExternRequiresDeclInApiFile(context, new_decl.loc_id);
|
|
}
|
|
if (prev_decl.is_extern != new_decl.is_extern) {
|
|
DiagnoseExternMismatch(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!prev_decl.extern_library_id.has_value()) {
|
|
if (new_decl.extern_library_id.has_value()) {
|
|
DiagnoseExternLibraryInImporter(context, decl_kind, name_id,
|
|
new_decl.loc_id, prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
} else {
|
|
DiagnoseRedundant(context, decl_kind, name_id, new_decl.loc_id,
|
|
prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
}
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (prev_decl.extern_library_id != SemIR::LibraryNameId::Error &&
|
|
prev_decl.extern_library_id != context.sem_ir().library_id()) {
|
|
DiagnoseExternLibraryIncorrect(context, new_decl.loc_id, prev_decl.loc_id);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto ReplacePrevInstForMerge(Context& context, SemIR::NameScopeId scope_id,
|
|
SemIR::NameId name_id, SemIR::InstId new_inst_id)
|
|
-> void {
|
|
auto& scope = context.name_scopes().Get(scope_id);
|
|
auto entry_id = scope.Lookup(name_id);
|
|
if (entry_id) {
|
|
auto& result = scope.GetEntry(*entry_id).result;
|
|
result = SemIR::ScopeLookupResult::MakeWrappedLookupResult(
|
|
new_inst_id, result.access_kind());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Returns true if there was an error in declaring the entity, which will have
|
|
// previously been diagnosed.
|
|
static auto EntityHasParamError(Context& context, const DeclParams& info)
|
|
-> bool {
|
|
for (auto param_patterns_id :
|
|
{info.implicit_param_patterns_id, info.param_patterns_id}) {
|
|
if (param_patterns_id.has_value() &&
|
|
param_patterns_id != SemIR::InstBlockId::Empty) {
|
|
for (auto param_id : context.inst_blocks().Get(param_patterns_id)) {
|
|
if (context.insts().Get(param_id).type_id() ==
|
|
SemIR::ErrorInst::TypeId) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Returns false if a param differs for a redeclaration. The caller is expected
|
|
// to provide a diagnostic.
|
|
static auto CheckRedeclParam(Context& context, bool is_implicit_param,
|
|
int32_t param_index,
|
|
SemIR::InstId orig_new_param_pattern_id,
|
|
SemIR::InstId orig_prev_param_pattern_id,
|
|
SemIR::SpecificId prev_specific_id, bool diagnose,
|
|
bool check_syntax, bool check_self) -> bool {
|
|
// TODO: Consider differentiating between type and name mistakes. For now,
|
|
// taking the simpler approach because I also think we may want to refactor
|
|
// params.
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(
|
|
RedeclParamPrevious, Note,
|
|
"previous declaration's corresponding {0:implicit |}parameter here",
|
|
Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect);
|
|
auto emit_diagnostic = [&]() {
|
|
if (!diagnose) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclParamDiffers, Error,
|
|
"redeclaration differs at {0:implicit |}parameter {1}",
|
|
Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect, int32_t);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(orig_new_param_pattern_id, RedeclParamDiffers, is_implicit_param,
|
|
param_index + 1)
|
|
.Note(orig_prev_param_pattern_id, RedeclParamPrevious,
|
|
is_implicit_param)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct PatternPair {
|
|
SemIR::InstId prev_id;
|
|
SemIR::InstId new_id;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
llvm::SmallVector<PatternPair, 1> pattern_stack;
|
|
|
|
pattern_stack.push_back({.prev_id = orig_prev_param_pattern_id,
|
|
.new_id = orig_new_param_pattern_id});
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
auto patterns = pattern_stack.pop_back_val();
|
|
auto new_param_pattern = context.insts().Get(patterns.new_id);
|
|
auto prev_param_pattern = context.insts().Get(patterns.prev_id);
|
|
if (new_param_pattern.kind() != prev_param_pattern.kind()) {
|
|
emit_diagnostic();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch (new_param_pattern.kind()) {
|
|
case SemIR::OutParamPattern::Kind:
|
|
case SemIR::RefParamPattern::Kind:
|
|
case SemIR::ValueParamPattern::Kind:
|
|
case SemIR::VarParamPattern::Kind: {
|
|
pattern_stack.push_back(
|
|
{.prev_id =
|
|
prev_param_pattern.As<SemIR::AnyParamPattern>().subpattern_id,
|
|
.new_id =
|
|
new_param_pattern.As<SemIR::AnyParamPattern>().subpattern_id});
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
case SemIR::VarPattern::Kind:
|
|
pattern_stack.push_back(
|
|
{.prev_id =
|
|
prev_param_pattern.As<SemIR::VarPattern>().subpattern_id,
|
|
.new_id =
|
|
new_param_pattern.As<SemIR::VarPattern>().subpattern_id});
|
|
break;
|
|
case SemIR::RefBindingPattern::Kind:
|
|
case SemIR::SymbolicBindingPattern::Kind:
|
|
case SemIR::ValueBindingPattern::Kind: {
|
|
auto new_name_id =
|
|
context.entity_names()
|
|
.Get(new_param_pattern.As<SemIR::AnyBindingPattern>()
|
|
.entity_name_id)
|
|
.name_id;
|
|
auto prev_name_id =
|
|
context.entity_names()
|
|
.Get(prev_param_pattern.As<SemIR::AnyBindingPattern>()
|
|
.entity_name_id)
|
|
.name_id;
|
|
|
|
if (!check_self && new_name_id == SemIR::NameId::SelfValue &&
|
|
prev_name_id == SemIR::NameId::SelfValue) {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto prev_param_type_id = SemIR::GetTypeOfInstInSpecific(
|
|
context.sem_ir(), prev_specific_id, patterns.prev_id);
|
|
if (!context.types().AreEqualAcrossDeclarations(
|
|
new_param_pattern.type_id(), prev_param_type_id)) {
|
|
if (!diagnose) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(
|
|
RedeclParamDiffersType, Error,
|
|
"type {3} of {0:implicit |}parameter {1} in "
|
|
"redeclaration differs from previous parameter type {2}",
|
|
Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect, int32_t, SemIR::TypeId, SemIR::TypeId);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(orig_new_param_pattern_id, RedeclParamDiffersType,
|
|
is_implicit_param, param_index + 1, prev_param_type_id,
|
|
new_param_pattern.type_id())
|
|
.Note(orig_prev_param_pattern_id, RedeclParamPrevious,
|
|
is_implicit_param)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (check_syntax && new_name_id != prev_name_id) {
|
|
emit_diagnostic();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
default: {
|
|
CARBON_FATAL("Unexpected inst kind in parameter pattern: {0}",
|
|
new_param_pattern.kind());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} while (!pattern_stack.empty());
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Returns false if the param refs differ for a redeclaration.
|
|
static auto CheckRedeclParams(Context& context, SemIR::LocId new_decl_loc_id,
|
|
SemIR::InstBlockId new_param_patterns_id,
|
|
SemIR::LocId prev_decl_loc_id,
|
|
SemIR::InstBlockId prev_param_patterns_id,
|
|
bool is_implicit_param,
|
|
SemIR::SpecificId prev_specific_id, bool diagnose,
|
|
bool check_syntax, bool check_self) -> bool {
|
|
// This will often occur for empty params.
|
|
if (new_param_patterns_id == prev_param_patterns_id) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If exactly one of the parameter lists was present, they differ.
|
|
if (new_param_patterns_id.has_value() != prev_param_patterns_id.has_value()) {
|
|
if (!diagnose) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclParamListDiffers, Error,
|
|
"redeclaration differs because of "
|
|
"{1:|missing }{0:implicit |}parameter list",
|
|
Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect, Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect);
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclParamListPrevious, Note,
|
|
"previously declared "
|
|
"{1:with|without} {0:implicit |}parameter list",
|
|
Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect, Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_decl_loc_id, RedeclParamListDiffers, is_implicit_param,
|
|
new_param_patterns_id.has_value())
|
|
.Note(prev_decl_loc_id, RedeclParamListPrevious, is_implicit_param,
|
|
prev_param_patterns_id.has_value())
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
CARBON_CHECK(new_param_patterns_id.has_value() &&
|
|
prev_param_patterns_id.has_value());
|
|
const auto new_param_pattern_ids =
|
|
context.inst_blocks().Get(new_param_patterns_id);
|
|
const auto prev_param_pattern_ids =
|
|
context.inst_blocks().Get(prev_param_patterns_id);
|
|
if (new_param_pattern_ids.size() != prev_param_pattern_ids.size()) {
|
|
if (!diagnose) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(
|
|
RedeclParamCountDiffers, Error,
|
|
"redeclaration differs because of {0:implicit |}parameter count of {1}",
|
|
Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect, int32_t);
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(
|
|
RedeclParamCountPrevious, Note,
|
|
"previously declared with {0:implicit |}parameter count of {1}",
|
|
Diagnostics::BoolAsSelect, int32_t);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_decl_loc_id, RedeclParamCountDiffers, is_implicit_param,
|
|
new_param_pattern_ids.size())
|
|
.Note(prev_decl_loc_id, RedeclParamCountPrevious, is_implicit_param,
|
|
prev_param_pattern_ids.size())
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
for (auto [index, new_param_pattern_id, prev_param_pattern_id] :
|
|
llvm::enumerate(new_param_pattern_ids, prev_param_pattern_ids)) {
|
|
if (!CheckRedeclParam(context, is_implicit_param, index,
|
|
new_param_pattern_id, prev_param_pattern_id,
|
|
prev_specific_id, diagnose, check_syntax,
|
|
check_self)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Returns true if the two nodes represent the same syntax.
|
|
// TODO: Detect raw identifiers (will require token changes).
|
|
static auto IsNodeSyntaxEqual(Context& context, Parse::NodeId new_node_id,
|
|
Parse::NodeId prev_node_id) -> bool {
|
|
if (context.parse_tree().node_kind(new_node_id) !=
|
|
context.parse_tree().node_kind(prev_node_id)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Should there be a trivial way to check if we need to check spellings?
|
|
// Identifiers and literals need their text checked for cross-file matching,
|
|
// but not intra-file. Keywords and operators shouldn't need the token text
|
|
// examined at all.
|
|
auto new_spelling = context.tokens().GetTokenText(
|
|
context.parse_tree().node_token(new_node_id));
|
|
auto prev_spelling = context.tokens().GetTokenText(
|
|
context.parse_tree().node_token(prev_node_id));
|
|
return new_spelling == prev_spelling;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Returns false if redeclaration parameter syntax doesn't match.
|
|
static auto CheckRedeclParamSyntax(Context& context,
|
|
Parse::NodeId new_first_param_node_id,
|
|
Parse::NodeId new_last_param_node_id,
|
|
Parse::NodeId prev_first_param_node_id,
|
|
Parse::NodeId prev_last_param_node_id,
|
|
bool diagnose) -> bool {
|
|
// Parse nodes may not always be available to compare.
|
|
// TODO: Support cross-file syntax checks. Right now imports provide
|
|
// `NodeId::None`, and we'll need to follow the declaration to its original
|
|
// file to get the parse tree.
|
|
if (!new_first_param_node_id.has_value() ||
|
|
!prev_first_param_node_id.has_value()) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
CARBON_CHECK(new_last_param_node_id.has_value(),
|
|
"new_last_param_node_id.has_value should match "
|
|
"new_first_param_node_id.has_value");
|
|
CARBON_CHECK(prev_last_param_node_id.has_value(),
|
|
"prev_last_param_node_id.has_value should match "
|
|
"prev_first_param_node_id.has_value");
|
|
Parse::Tree::PostorderIterator new_iter(new_first_param_node_id);
|
|
Parse::Tree::PostorderIterator new_end(new_last_param_node_id);
|
|
Parse::Tree::PostorderIterator prev_iter(prev_first_param_node_id);
|
|
Parse::Tree::PostorderIterator prev_end(prev_last_param_node_id);
|
|
// Done when one past the last node to check.
|
|
++new_end;
|
|
++prev_end;
|
|
|
|
// Compare up to the shortest length.
|
|
for (; new_iter != new_end && prev_iter != prev_end;
|
|
++new_iter, ++prev_iter) {
|
|
auto new_node_id = *new_iter;
|
|
auto prev_node_id = *prev_iter;
|
|
if (!IsNodeSyntaxEqual(context, new_node_id, prev_node_id)) {
|
|
// Skip difference if it is `Self as` vs. `as` in an `impl` declaration.
|
|
// https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/proposals/p3763.md#redeclarations
|
|
auto new_node_kind = context.parse_tree().node_kind(new_node_id);
|
|
auto prev_node_kind = context.parse_tree().node_kind(prev_node_id);
|
|
if (new_node_kind == Parse::NodeKind::ImplDefaultSelfAs &&
|
|
prev_node_kind == Parse::NodeKind::SelfTypeNameExpr &&
|
|
context.parse_tree().node_kind(prev_iter[1]) ==
|
|
Parse::NodeKind::ImplTypeAs) {
|
|
++prev_iter;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
if (prev_node_kind == Parse::NodeKind::ImplDefaultSelfAs &&
|
|
new_node_kind == Parse::NodeKind::SelfTypeNameExpr &&
|
|
context.parse_tree().node_kind(new_iter[1]) ==
|
|
Parse::NodeKind::ImplTypeAs) {
|
|
++new_iter;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!diagnose) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclParamSyntaxDiffers, Error,
|
|
"redeclaration syntax differs here");
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(RedeclParamSyntaxPrevious, Note,
|
|
"comparing with previous declaration here");
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(new_node_id, RedeclParamSyntaxDiffers)
|
|
.Note(prev_node_id, RedeclParamSyntaxPrevious)
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// The prefixes are the same, but the lengths may still be different. This is
|
|
// only relevant for `impl` declarations where the final bracketing node is
|
|
// not included in the range of nodes being compared, and in those cases
|
|
// `diagnose` is false.
|
|
if (new_iter != new_end) {
|
|
CARBON_CHECK(!diagnose);
|
|
return false;
|
|
} else if (prev_iter != prev_end) {
|
|
CARBON_CHECK(!diagnose);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto CheckRedeclParamsMatch(Context& context, const DeclParams& new_entity,
|
|
const DeclParams& prev_entity,
|
|
SemIR::SpecificId prev_specific_id, bool diagnose,
|
|
bool check_syntax, bool check_self) -> bool {
|
|
if (EntityHasParamError(context, new_entity) ||
|
|
EntityHasParamError(context, prev_entity)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!CheckRedeclParams(
|
|
context, new_entity.loc_id, new_entity.implicit_param_patterns_id,
|
|
prev_entity.loc_id, prev_entity.implicit_param_patterns_id,
|
|
/*is_implicit_param=*/true, prev_specific_id, diagnose, check_syntax,
|
|
check_self)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
// Don't forward `check_self` here because it's extra cost, and `self` is only
|
|
// allowed in implicit params.
|
|
if (!CheckRedeclParams(context, new_entity.loc_id,
|
|
new_entity.param_patterns_id, prev_entity.loc_id,
|
|
prev_entity.param_patterns_id,
|
|
/*is_implicit_param=*/false, prev_specific_id,
|
|
diagnose, check_syntax, /*check_self=*/true)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
if (check_syntax &&
|
|
!CheckRedeclParamSyntax(context, new_entity.first_param_node_id,
|
|
new_entity.last_param_node_id,
|
|
prev_entity.first_param_node_id,
|
|
prev_entity.last_param_node_id, diagnose)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace Carbon::Check
|