Files
carbon-lang/explorer/testdata/basic_syntax/choice.carbon
T
Jon Ross-Perkins 82f33ff384 Use new test framework in explorer to reduce per-test overhead (#2811)
Isolating test execution time (no build time included):

- Linux, `lit` test-per-file: Elapsed time: 28.214s, Critical Path: 13.97s
- Linux, `cc_test`-per-file: Elapsed time: 11.534s, Critical Path: 6.05s
- Linux, merged `cc_test` with 50 shards: Elapsed time: 11.677s, Critical Path: 11.17s
- Mac, `lit` test-per-file: Elapsed time: 295.686s, Critical Path: 20.00s
- Mac, `cc_test`-per-file: Elapsed time: 55.788s, Critical Path: 3.81s
- Mac, merged `cc_test` with 50 shards: Elapsed time: 16.269s, Critical Path: 7.54s

In GH actions:

- [Before](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/actions/runs/4866602695/jobs/8678306144?pr=2799):
  - test / test (ubuntu-22.04, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 20m
  - test / test (ubuntu-22.04, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 15m
  - test / test (macos-12, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 36m
  - test / test (macos-12, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 21m
- [After](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/actions/runs/4875154751/jobs/8697004066?pr=2811):
  - test / test (ubuntu-22.04, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 10m
  - test / test (ubuntu-22.04, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 9m
  - test / test (macos-12, fastbuild) (pull_request_target) Successful in 12m
  - test / test (macos-12, opt) (pull_request_target) Successful in 9m

I'm still leaving a handful of `lit` tests to test end-to-end binary execution. This is why testdata directories are split (`lit` tests next to the `explorer` binary, the `cc_test`s next to `ParseAndExecute`).
2023-05-15 16:23:59 -07:00

43 lines
914 B
Plaintext

// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
// AUTOUPDATE
// CHECK:STDOUT: result: 1
package ExplorerTest api;
choice Ints {
None,
One(i32),
Two(i32, i32)
}
// Test some alternate syntaxes
choice MoreInts {
None(),
One(i32),
Two(i32, i32),
}
fn Main() -> i32 {
var x: Ints = Ints.None;
var y: Ints = Ints.One(42);
var z: MoreInts = MoreInts.None();
var n: i32 = 0;
match (y) {
case Ints.None => { n = n + 2; }
case Ints.One(x: auto) => { n = x + 1 - 42; }
case Ints.Two(a: auto, b: auto) => { n = 2; }
}
match (x) {
case Ints.One(x: auto) => { n = x + 2; }
case Ints.None => { n = n - 1; }
case Ints.Two(x: auto, y: auto) => { n = 5; }
}
match (z) {
case MoreInts.None() => { ++n; }
}
return n;
}