Geoff RomerandJon Meow bc5a42211b Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870) ...

I should emphasize that I am **completely cheating** here. This PR does not add support for actually _performing_  implicit conversions at run time, because the AST doesn't yet contain the necessary type information. At run time, code like `var p: Point = {.x = 1, .y = 2};` directly initializes the name `p` with the _struct_ value `{.x = 1, .y = 2}`; no object of type `Point` is actually created. I'm only getting away with this because we don't yet have any tests that can tell the difference.

Co-authored-by: Jon Meow <46229924+jonmeow@users.noreply.github.com>

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

..

assign_member.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

assign.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

fail_field_access_mismatch.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

fail_field_mismatch.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

fail_field_missing.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

function_param.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

global_var.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

temp.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00

var.carbon

Support struct implicit conversions in type-checking (#870)

2021-10-12 10:27:20 -07:00