mirror of
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git
synced 2026-09-24 22:02:23 +01:00
Jon Ross-Perkins
86a7c9ff45
This was previously discussed at https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1209975051588210729. I'm initiating this mainly because we typically use "id" suffixes to indicate an `IdBase` being passed around and the non-id suffix of `parse_node` suggests at it carrying more data than it actually does. There used to be more reason for avoiding `node_id` because `SemIR::InstId` used to be named `NodeId`, but that's no longer necessary. As a consequence, I'd like to rename `parse_node` to more precisely reflect its type. In full, this is doing: ``` parse_node_kind -> node_kind parse_node -> node_id ParseNodeCategory -> NodeCategory ParseNodeKind -> NodeKind ParseNode -> NodeId ``` This is primarily in check and sem_ir, but with some `parse_node_kind` references in parse too. Pluralization is consistent with name forms on both sides, so that wasn't part of my replacements.
98 lines
4.0 KiB
C++
98 lines
4.0 KiB
C++
// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
|
|
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
|
|
#include "toolchain/check/context.h"
|
|
#include "toolchain/check/decl_state.h"
|
|
#include "toolchain/lex/token_kind.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace Carbon::Check {
|
|
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(ModifierPrevious, Note, "`{0}` previously appeared here.",
|
|
Lex::TokenKind);
|
|
|
|
static auto EmitRepeatedDiagnostic(Context& context, Parse::NodeId first_node,
|
|
Parse::NodeId second_node) -> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(ModifierRepeated, Error, "`{0}` repeated on declaration.",
|
|
Lex::TokenKind);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(second_node, ModifierRepeated, context.token_kind(second_node))
|
|
.Note(first_node, ModifierPrevious, context.token_kind(first_node))
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static auto EmitNotAllowedWithDiagnostic(Context& context,
|
|
Parse::NodeId first_node,
|
|
Parse::NodeId second_node) -> void {
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(ModifierNotAllowedWith, Error,
|
|
"`{0}` not allowed on declaration with `{1}`.",
|
|
Lex::TokenKind, Lex::TokenKind);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(second_node, ModifierNotAllowedWith,
|
|
context.token_kind(second_node), context.token_kind(first_node))
|
|
.Note(first_node, ModifierPrevious, context.token_kind(first_node))
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static auto HandleModifier(Context& context, Parse::NodeId node_id,
|
|
KeywordModifierSet keyword) -> bool {
|
|
auto& s = context.decl_state_stack().innermost();
|
|
|
|
ModifierOrder order;
|
|
KeywordModifierSet later_modifiers;
|
|
if (!!(keyword & KeywordModifierSet::Access)) {
|
|
order = ModifierOrder::Access;
|
|
later_modifiers = KeywordModifierSet::Extern | KeywordModifierSet::Decl;
|
|
} else if (keyword == KeywordModifierSet::Extern) {
|
|
order = ModifierOrder::Extern;
|
|
later_modifiers = KeywordModifierSet::Decl;
|
|
} else {
|
|
order = ModifierOrder::Decl;
|
|
later_modifiers = KeywordModifierSet::None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto current_modifier_node_id = s.modifier_node_id(order);
|
|
if (!!(s.modifier_set & keyword)) {
|
|
EmitRepeatedDiagnostic(context, current_modifier_node_id, node_id);
|
|
} else if (current_modifier_node_id.is_valid()) {
|
|
EmitNotAllowedWithDiagnostic(context, current_modifier_node_id, node_id);
|
|
} else if (auto later_modifier_set = s.modifier_set & later_modifiers;
|
|
!!later_modifier_set) {
|
|
// At least one later modifier is present. Diagnose using the closest.
|
|
Parse::NodeId closest_later_modifier = Parse::NodeId::Invalid;
|
|
for (auto later_order = static_cast<int8_t>(order) + 1;
|
|
later_order <= static_cast<int8_t>(ModifierOrder::Last);
|
|
++later_order) {
|
|
if (s.ordered_modifier_node_ids[later_order] != Parse::NodeId::Invalid) {
|
|
closest_later_modifier = s.ordered_modifier_node_ids[later_order];
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
CARBON_CHECK(closest_later_modifier.is_valid());
|
|
|
|
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(ModifierMustAppearBefore, Error,
|
|
"`{0}` must appear before `{1}`.", Lex::TokenKind,
|
|
Lex::TokenKind);
|
|
context.emitter()
|
|
.Build(node_id, ModifierMustAppearBefore, context.token_kind(node_id),
|
|
context.token_kind(closest_later_modifier))
|
|
.Note(closest_later_modifier, ModifierPrevious,
|
|
context.token_kind(closest_later_modifier))
|
|
.Emit();
|
|
} else {
|
|
s.modifier_set |= keyword;
|
|
s.set_modifier_node_id(order, node_id);
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#define CARBON_PARSE_NODE_KIND(...)
|
|
#define CARBON_PARSE_NODE_KIND_TOKEN_MODIFIER(Name, ...) \
|
|
auto Handle##Name##Modifier(Context& context, \
|
|
Parse::Name##ModifierId node_id) -> bool { \
|
|
return HandleModifier(context, node_id, KeywordModifierSet::Name); \
|
|
}
|
|
#include "toolchain/parse/node_kind.def"
|
|
|
|
} // namespace Carbon::Check
|