Files
carbon-lang/toolchain/parse/parse.cpp
T
Jon Ross-Perkins 2de746e83c Switch compile functions to use options structs (#5742)
I've been mulling this mainly for the parameter complexity of
check/lower, but doing lex/parse for symmetry.

I'm motivated by the plan to move dumping for all of them into the
respective functions, because of discussion about llvm-verifier. That
basically would add another bool parameter (or more) to each of these.
My instinct is we're going to probably accrue a little more over time,
so I'm suggesting this as maybe adding the boundary a little simpler
and/or easier to read.

Note it may make sense to refactor a little further, e.g. maybe
Lower::Context could receive the full set of options and pick out what
it wants, but I figured creating the struct itself would be a decent
start.

I'm trying to put things into options when we can produce a reasonable
default if the user doesn't assign a value. I'm using an explicit
constructor so that values can be added without affecting every caller.

A different factoring would be to pass in everything through the param
struct, but that just felt weird when I was trying it out.

Removing `inst_namer` and `module_name` from `LowerToLLVM` params --
both of these can be inferred from `sem_ir`, and I'm not seeing a
particular reason to maintain them at the call site.
2025-06-27 22:08:47 +00:00

65 lines
2.3 KiB
C++

// Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
// Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
#include "toolchain/parse/parse.h"
#include "common/check.h"
#include "common/pretty_stack_trace_function.h"
#include "toolchain/parse/context.h"
#include "toolchain/parse/handle.h"
#include "toolchain/parse/node_kind.h"
namespace Carbon::Parse {
auto HandleInvalid(Context& context) -> void {
CARBON_FATAL("The Invalid state shouldn't be on the stack: {0}",
context.PopState());
}
auto Parse(Lex::TokenizedBuffer& tokens, ParseOptions options) -> Tree {
auto* consumer =
options.consumer ? options.consumer : &Diagnostics::ConsoleConsumer();
// Delegate to the parser.
Tree tree(tokens);
Context context(&tree, &tokens, consumer, options.vlog_stream);
PrettyStackTraceFunction context_dumper(
[&](llvm::raw_ostream& output) { context.PrintForStackDump(output); });
context.AddLeafNode(NodeKind::FileStart,
context.ConsumeChecked(Lex::TokenKind::FileStart));
context.PushState(StateKind::DeclScopeLoopAsNonClass);
while (!context.state_stack().empty()) {
switch (context.state_stack().back().kind) {
#define CARBON_PARSE_STATE(Name) \
case StateKind::Name: \
Handle##Name(context); \
break;
#include "toolchain/parse/state.def"
}
}
context.AddLeafNode(NodeKind::FileEnd, *context.position());
// Mark the tree as potentially having errors if there were errors coming in
// from the tokenized buffer or we diagnosed new errors.
tree.set_has_errors(tokens.has_errors() || context.has_errors());
if (auto verify = tree.Verify(); !verify.ok()) {
// TODO: This is temporarily printing to stderr directly during development.
// If we can, restrict this to a subtree with the error and add it to the
// stack trace (such as with PrettyStackTraceFunction). Otherwise, switch
// back to vlog_stream prior to broader distribution so that end users are
// hopefully comfortable copy-pasting stderr when there are bugs in tree
// construction.
tree.Print(llvm::errs());
CARBON_FATAL("Invalid tree returned by Parse(): {0}", verify.error());
}
return tree;
}
} // namespace Carbon::Parse