carbon-lang

mirror of https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang.git synced 2026-09-25 09:20:12 +01:00

Files

T

Jon Meow bbd4940e6d Be more explicit about AST types (#921 )

This was born out of wanting FunctionDeclaration to explicitly have a Block for a body, and became a bit more of specifying types around. Note this forces exec_program to generate a Block for print()'s body, which is probably more correct as now we can expect a standard FunctionDeclaration AST structure, even for the built-ins.

There is a syntactic change here: a continuation's body is now a Block, not just a Statement. I've added an example disallowed test case. I think this is more reasonable syntax.

Other than that, note that optional_else now generates a valid Block. This has me thinking about whether we can eliminate Sequence, but that seemed well out of scope for this.

2021-10-28 13:54:45 -07:00

await_maintains_scope.carbon

Reorganize tests into dirs and rename numbered tests (#825 )

2021-09-15 16:37:34 -07:00

creation_is_noop.carbon

Reorganize tests into dirs and rename numbered tests (#825 )

2021-09-15 16:37:34 -07:00

fail_continuation_syntax.carbon

Be more explicit about AST types (#921 )

2021-10-28 13:54:45 -07:00

fail_lifetime.carbon

Reorganize tests into dirs and rename numbered tests (#825 )