This action was created to wrap any `MetaInstId` operand of an action
instruction. This served two purposes:
1) It had a special hook in `OperandIsDependent` to allow it to be
performed while it had a dependent operand (the reference to the
instruction in the generic).
2) It created a `specific_inst` so that the downstream action saw an
instruction in the specific instead of one in the generic.
These are both replaced: the special case in `OperandIsDependent` for
`RefineInstAction` is replaced by a special case for `MetaInstId`s in
general, and the `SpecificInst` is now created as part of performing the
downstream action, rather than as a separate step carried out
beforehand.
This simplifies the produced SemIR and reduces the number of splices
significantly. It also prepares us to handle actions like
initialization, where we don't actually want to create `SpecificInst`s
immediately in the location where the action is performed, because they
actually belong somewhere else in the IR.
Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5 and Gemini via Antigravity
Add basic support for lowering templates: we can now lower `SpliceInst`
in the case where the generic and specific are from the same file (and
we don't support importing templates from other files yet in general).
In order for this to work, lowering needs to be able to query the
expression category, and to handle instructions that appear to be
(template) constants in the generic but turn out to be non-constant in
the specific, so support for that is added.
Switch `type_of_inst` from being added as an action inst to being added
as a normal inst, since it's not an action and the old approach led to a
crash in lowering.
Replace `refine_type_action` with `refine_inst_action`, and generate a
`specific_inst` instead of an `as_compatible` to represent the specific
version of an instruction that's used as an input to a template action.
This gives us a place to handle other properties of the instruction that
might vary from generic to specific beyond its type, such as its
constant value and its expression category.
For now, we provide a non-template-dependent constant value to the
`specific_inst` in addition to the non-template-dependent type we have
traditionally provided. This doesn't seem to matter for any current
actions, but sets us up to better handle future actions. The
`specific_inst` representation also allows downstream consumers of the
instruction to track which specific they should be requesting
information from. Providing a correct expression category for
`specific_inst` will be handled in a future PR.
`TemplateInst` wraps another inst. If that inst is symbolic, it is
treated as a template by `OperandDependence`.
Use this to replace `CallCppTemplateAction` with the more general
`CallAction`.
`GetCallee` is sometimes called on a spliced instruction, and is
checking its exact inst operand to see if it's a `BoundMethod`. This
fails if the `BoundMethod` is wrapped in another instruction, such as a
splice. Normally our approach for such a situation would be to
constant-evaluate the operand, but that doesn't work here because the
`BoundMethod` will be non-constant if its bound `self` is. So instead we
now step through splice instructions manually when looking for the
`BoundMethod`.
Calls with template callee or args can now be deferred via an
InstAction. This allows code like this to check:
```carbon
import Cpp inline '''
template<typename T>
struct C {};
''';
fn F(generic T: type) {
let unused c: Cpp.C(T) = Cpp.C(T).C();
}
```
Example:
```carbon
import Cpp library "<vector>";
class C(T: type) {
var v: Cpp.std.vector(T);
}
inline Cpp '''
void F() {
Carbon::C<int> c;
c.v.push_back(123);
std::cout << c.v.back() << std::endl;
}
''';
```
A new `CallCppTemplateAction` is used to delay performing the C++
template call until non-symbolic arguments are known.
Implement the toolchain side of proposal #7254, removing the `:!`
binding
syntax for generic and template parameters in favor of the keywords
`generic`,
`template`, and `runtime` plus contextual defaults for phase.
For valid programs this is semantics-preserving: each binding resolves
to the
same phase, and produces the same SemIR, as it did under `:!`/`:`. The
parser
derives a binding's phase from its syntactic context plus any explicit
phase
keyword; new diagnostics and error recovery for misused keywords are
described
below.
Implementation details for each component:
- Lexer: remove the `:!` (`ColonExclaim`) token, move its virtual
parse-node
budget onto `:`, and add the `generic` and `runtime` keywords.
- Parser: thread a `BindingContext` (`ExplicitParam`, `DeducedParam`, or
`CompileTimeEntityParam`) from declaration introducers down through
parameter
lists to each binding pattern, using a one-token lookahead to
distinguish a
name-qualifier parameter list from a declaration's own final list.
Parameters
of a compile-time entity (`class`, `interface`, `constraint`, `choice`,
`alias`, `export`, `namespace`) and deduced `[]` parameters default to
checked
generic; explicit function parameters and local bindings default to
runtime.
`HandleBindingPattern` resolves the phase from that context plus the
keyword: a
`generic` keyword needs no node of its own (the phase is carried by the
binding's node kind), while a `runtime` keyword is preserved as a
`RuntimeBindingName` node so `check` can name it in a diagnostic. A
phase
keyword that is merely redundant with the contextual default is
diagnosed
here, without invalidating the parse tree.
- Check: a phase keyword that is invalid for its context (for example
`runtime`
on a checked-generic parameter) is diagnosed here, and recovers by
building an
error binding that still introduces the name so that later uses of it do
not
produce cascading errors.
The removed `:!` syntax is now rejected as an ordinary parse error.
The `form`/`:?`/`->?` ("extended types") portion of proposal #7254 is
left for a
separate change.
Assisted-by: Claude Code
Implementation of unused pattern bindings #2022, continued.
Whereas previous PR #6460 took care of parsing, and PR #6479 prepared
the stage by using _ in some test cases, this PR has the the actual
implementation, using a simple dataflow analysis.
---------
Co-authored-by: Burak Emir <bqe@google.com>
Co-authored-by: jonmeow <jperkins@google.com>
Expose C++ class templates, variable templates, alias templates, and
concepts as callable values in Carbon, and map calls to them into
template-id formation, mirroring how Carbon generics behave. For now,
only type template parameters are supported; non-type and template
template parameters produce a TODO error.
Richard Smith
Nicholas Bishop
Chandler Carruth
