In line with the proposal in #4682, this changes the array syntax to be
array(T, N). `array` is a builtin keyword which must be followed by
parens containing two expressions and a separating comma.
The array type expression is still fully builtin, it does not forward to
a Core.Array library type yet. It merely adds the `ArrayType`
instruction, as was done with the previous syntax.
Followup work will change the instruction to reference to Core.Array,
once the library type exists and can be used directly.
---------
Co-authored-by: zygoloid <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Parameter lists need substantially different treatment than tuple
patterns in other contexts, so this change splits them into separate
parse node kinds.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Change parse tree from `template (T:! type)` to `(template T):! type`,
so that we have information about whether a binding is a template
binding available when forming the representation of the binding
pattern. This incidentally fixes a bug that we would accept `template
addr A:! B` instead of the intended `addr template A:! B`.
Track whether a symbolic binding is a template binding on the
`EntityName` object. I'm borrowing a bit from the `CompileTimeBindIndex`
for this in order to avoid making `EntityName`s larger. Longer-term, we
should think about using a different representation for symbolic
bindings, to avoid including these fields in all `EntityName`s, but
that's out of scope for this change.
So far, template bindings are treated as having the same phase as
checked bindings, but that will change in a future PR.
To do this, we restructure the parse tree to make `forall` a leaf node
that comes before the parameter list.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Change representation of package names from `IdentifierId` to
`PackageNameId`, and add a special value `PackageNameId::Core` for the
Core package. Add a `Core` expression to name the Core package, and
support for parsing the `Core` keyword in `package` and `import`
declarations.
For now, I've made no changes to instruction fingerprinting or name
mangling. This means that fingerprints and mangled names will collide
between names in the `Core` package and names in a `r#Core` package. See
#4908.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Based on [the lastest thinking on
#4672](https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/issues/4672#issuecomment-2606209281)
, require a full syntactic match for impl redeclaration, instead of
excluding the `where` restriction. This means no updates to the impl
witness on redeclaration, and no diagnostics that those updates are
consistent.
Not included in this PR, but will need to be done in the future:
* Support for assigning values to associated constants in the body of
the impl definition. This will require moving the checking that
non-function associated constants are set from the definition start to
definition end.
* Identify semantic redeclarations that are not syntactic matches to
give a failed redeclaration diagnostic. This should be done once we are
already identifying impl declarations with the same type structure in
order to require they be identified in an impl_priority/match_first
block.
* Merging of the functions in `check/impl.cpp` that are now always
called together.
Also add some test coverage of `where` parsing I developed in PR I've
now abandoned because of this new simplification of the impl
redeclaration semantics.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This removes some churn when adding new diagnostic cases to test files
(where previous to this change the newly added newline would cause the
previous diagnostic CHECKs to be updated including changes to the line
number because the CHECK for the blank line meant an extra line between
CHECK and source line).
A few alternatives discussed here:
https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1329573358475673723
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This change splits `NodeKind::IdentifierName` into separate node kinds
depending on whether the identifier is followed by parameters, and
similarly splits `NameQualifier` based on whether the qualifier has
parameters. This enables us to only push a pattern block when it's
actually needed, rather than "defensively" pushing one when it might be
needed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
These don't fully work in check and beyond yet, because they're not
added into lexical lookup, but already mostly do the right thing.
Per #3407, disallow namespace declarations anywhere other than at file
scope for now.
We don't treat statements starting with a packaging introducer keyword
(`package`, `library`, `import`) as declarations because they're
sufficiently unlikely to occur that the error recovery doesn't seem
important, and this avoids needing to disambiguate `package.` at the
start of an expression.
I'm working to make sure remaining diagnostics have coverage, at least
the ones I'd previously added a TODO for. Note in particular that I
couldn't figure out a repro for UnaryOperatorRequiresWhitespace; if you
have one, I can add a test, but otherwise maybe it's actually
unreachable due to being diagnosed through infix logic (or, maybe
this'll let fuzzing tell me an example).
Split StructComma into StructLiteralComma and StructTypeLiteralComma in
order to easily differentiate handling (remains the same in this PR).
Add "Literal" to StructField and StructTypeField because it feels
inconsistent versus the other non-shared things. StructFieldDesignator
remains shared between value literals and type literals.
Note I probably would've made StructFieldDesignator non-shared too, but
that'd require either a lookahead of 2 (to see the separator`) or a
writeback after parsing the separator, neither of which felt especially
crucial for this, when what I'm really trying to do is split type
literal handling a little further.
An invalid parse due to an error token isn't likely a great diagnostic
as it will already have been diagnosed by the lexer. A common case to
start handling that is when the parser encounters an invalid token when
expecting an expression.
This removes a number of unhelpful diagnostics after the lexer has done
a good job diagnosing.
This also means that there may be parse tree errors that aren't
diagnosed when there are lexer-diagnosed errors, so track that.
Follow-up to #4430 that almost finishes addressing its diagnostic TODO.
This refactors the diagnostic kind coverage check into something that
also works for node kinds. Then, since this points out a few node kinds
that aren't having their parse verified, I'm adding minor tests for
those.
Also surround it in square brackets rather than parentheses. This
matches the format used by Clang and GCC, and means diagnostics will
still match the `file:line:col: error: ` pattern used by some IDE tools.
Before:
```console
fail_builtins.carbon:11:11: error(AliasRequiresNameRef): alias initializer must be a name reference
```
After:
```console
fail_builtins.carbon:11:11: error: alias initializer must be a name reference [AliasRequiresNameRef]
```
Also tighten up test regex to only match on `STDERR` lines that list a
file name.
This is to help identify which diagnostics we're actually using.
Note that driver/testdata still has tests which don't pass this flag,
and so continue to test the kind-less (default) behavior.
Omit the `note: ` prefix and the snippet from the "in import" note that
precedes a diagnostic.
This makes our diagnostic output more closely match that of Clang and
GCC.
This is a primarily automated change:
- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
- `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
- `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
- ERROR -> error
- WARNING -> warning
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Includes support for the `impls`, `=`, and `==` requirement operators to
the right of a `where`, but `and` to allow multiple requirements is
still a TODO.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Applies #4278 TEST_NAME substitution to tests. Note I've tried to
structure commits as:
1. Do all the replacements.
2. autoupdate (nothing else) -- this shows incorrect updates.
3. Fix up manually, including autoupdates to get back to original
output.
These appear in `where` clauses, as in:
```
U:! InterfaceB where .C = Vector(.D)
V:! type where Vector(.Self) impls Sortable
```
`.Self` can additionally appear in type expressions in a binding pattern
such as `T:! InterfaceA(.Self)`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This has is a nice-to-have for me. Frequently I want to run a specific
test, and end up digging through output to be able to copy-paste the run
line. This uses TIP lines to inject the command into the file when using
AUTOUPDATE.
Note, one of the reasons I want this is because "bazel test
//toolchain/testing:file_test --test_output=all" has been regularly
exceeding bazel's output limit for me (workaround is either opening the
output file or specifying an obscure output limit flag), making it a
little harder for me to get the commands. However, frequently I'm adding
a file and want to iterate on it, so that's really the use case I have
in mind here.
Parse the name of a declaration as a sequence of `NameQualifier`s --
which have a name, possibly parameters, and a trailing period --
followed by a name and possibly parameters. This prepares us for parsing
declarations of members of generic classes and similar cases, but
actually supporting such member redeclarations is left to a future
change.
We previously required functions to have parameters, but no longer do,
following the direction of #3848. Cases like namespaces that can't
actually have parameters are now diagnosed in check instead of in parse.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Change syntax for package declaration to put the `impl` keyword at the
start and remove the `api` keyword.
To support this, rearrange processing of package, library, and import
declarations to use the general modifier handling support in declaration
parsing rather than special-case logic.
There is an ambiguity in `impl package.Foo as Bar`, which we resolve by
treating `package` as an introducer after a modifier only if it's not
followed by `.`.
This provides `export import` logic in lex, parse, and check; `export
name` logic is only in lex and parse, not check.
I think with `export name` I'm going to need to modify import_ref and
some consolidation logic, whereas `export import` seems feasible to keep
as primarily import logic. Given the implementations were looking like
they'd diverge more substantially, I thought it'd be helpful to cut the
PR here.
When we expect a semicolon, we should be able to provide more standard
recovery.
Note this affects a test of `base`, but it looks like a partial
improvement (the prior line was moving too far). Still, it looks like
recovery isn't handling `{}` quite right. I'm not trying to address that
here though -- leaving a TODO.
The expected parse tree size is validated for valid parse trees, which
is possible even if lex encounters an error. In that case, we were
missing recovery tokens, resulting in a crash. AddToken should be the
only place we call `token_infos_.push_back`.
Jon Ross-Perkins
Dana Jansensandzygoloid
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins
czapiga
David BlaikieandJon Ross-Perkins
Chandler Carruth
Brymer Meneses