One more (hopefully last) rename on the Import instruction renaming.
I was kind of tempted to rename to just "IRId", since the IRs aren't all
imports. However, this felt easier to read, and a better choice than
CrossRef because it's more consistent with the other ways imports exist
in code. (even if IRs aren't all imports, most use-cases are derived
from imports)
Note though that import_irs may include IRs not just from direct
imports. Beyond the builtin IR, I'm thinking that for indirect imports,
or the prelude, we may end up adding them. e.g., so that constants can
be generated for indirect imports and still correspond to a directly
known IR, and for a given IR that's indirectly imported multiple times
to be deduplicated locally. I'm not there yet, I'm just mentioning this
to help give background for naming thoughts.
Builds on #3656.
Under the prior "lazy" model, we had been planning to copy instructions.
Under the current "unused+used" model, we're restricting that to
constants. I'm trimming back some of the ResolveIfImportRefUnused logic
because it was more appropriate for the former model.
Right now, I'm adding ImportRefUsed direct creation in import.cpp for
namespaces. I think I'll need to do something similar in
RseolveIfImportRefUnused... I'm still trying to think about how to
manage type information there (which needs to come in as an import
reference itself, and probably have some amount of deduplication before
forming a TypeId). So ImportRefUnused lacks a type because I'm hesitant
to aggressively load it, whereas ImportRefUsed should *always* have a
type but it's just an error while I think things through.
For reference, ImportRefUnused and ImportRefUsed are mainly split in
order to track the boolean "used" without making fundamental
modifications to Inst for bit packing (this effectively instead packs a
bit into InstKind). AnyImportRef currently excludes the type because
it's mainly for diagnostic printing at the moment. It could end up with
a TypeId that would end up Invalid for ImportRefUnused, though it could
also be that the TypeId is only accessed when using ImportRefUsed
explicitly.
This makes some changes to the formatter so that ImportRefUnused and
ImportRefUsed will both be labeled as "import_ref" with an "unused ->
used" argument change in textual IR, but is otherwise not changing
logic.
I'd excluded these initially just because I was thinking towards copies,
but under the current model I'm trying to catch all the decl types just
for consistency. Note references will still be a TODO error
(LazyImportRef is already tested for this, it just didn't feel necessary
to add individual tests while I try to sort out behavior).
Fixes an oversight where declarations in an entity's scope were being
added to the list of exports.
Note I'm trimming some Import API arguments as now-unused.
Building on #3636 which handles the general import case, add special
casing for namespaces. Namespaces can be combined cross-IR, so it's a
little more complex.
The implementation adds import_id to the Namespace instruction as a
reference to find the original using the normal structure. This is
achieved by moving the name_id to NameScope to free up space.
---
I considered a few alternatives...
I considered adding import_id to NameScope, but:
1. It's more consistent with things such as Function or Class that
provide name_id on the info object rather than the instruction.
2. I thought it more likely that there would be more NameScope cases
that might want a name_id rather than the import_id, since ImportRef
will typically be used.
I considered putting the import source (cross-ref IR id + inst id) on
the NameScope versus a separate ImportRef, which seems like the
strongest argument towards the NameScope approach because it removes an
instruction. That just felt inconsistent though, and the overhead of
instruction-per-imported-namespace should be low (theoretically few
namespaces should be used). Plus I feel a bit odd adding two
generally-unused ids to NameScope.
A specialized Namespace structure could also have been created to store
the import_id, but that would add an indirection to the NameScope.
Name conflicts weren't previously tested, and the diagnostics were just
a TODO, so this is also adding testing for that. But handling too.
Removing AddEntry because I think it's hard to make helpful for this
use-case when we want to do a diagnostic followup (because really,
callers want the full `.insert` result of pointer + success), and unused
otherwise.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Instructions created by splices during conversion are now evaluated, as
are instructions created in cases where we first create a placeholder
instruction and later replace it by a different instruction.
This also removes the ability to set a parse node and instruction
independently after creating an `InstId`, which could lead to them
accidentally not matching.
The parse nodes are still tracked as part of the same value store
interface in order to ensure parity, but they're split out from Inst
itself in order to reduce the size of Inst -- the expectation is that
they don't need to be passed around quite as much.
This change doesn't actually reduce the passing very much, although
there are hints of it: AddInstAndPush doesn't typically need a separate
parse node from the one on the Inst itself, for example. In a couple
spots I changed code to rely a little more on the InstId until the
ParseNode is needed, but it's very low hanging fruit where done. I think
convert could do more to not eagerly fetch the parse node before its
use, but more cleanup felt it would be easier to handle separately. I'm
currently viewing this as making such cleanup _possible_ rather than
executing on it up-front.
But also, I want to make sure there's a consensus to head in this
direction before pulling the trigger. We speculated that this would
result in the parse node being passed around less, and I do think that's
the case, although it's a bit fuzzy in the change.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Per discussion, unqualified lookup should only occur on identifiers that
existed at the time Context was initialized. As a consequence, the
resize logic in LexicalLookup may not be necessary. Even considering
metaprogramming, if metaprogramming is restricted to qualified name
lookup, it may not be necessary in the future. Support should be easy to
add if we need it. Trying to clearly document in the CHECK message what
the rationale is.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This is primarily being done for performance reasons, removing hash
lookups. The increased memory consumption is accepted.
Refactors LexicalLookup out to its own structure.
This is currently built on top of #3575. I'm just getting to the point
where imports have enough logic that I'm thinking they may be able to
stand on their own.
Jon Ross-Perkins
