Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith 851ef2c517 Initial, very rough lowering for calls to specific functions and specific function declarations. (#4399)
Generate declarations of specific functions on demand. Definitions are
not emitted yet, and I'm using a temporary, known-broken scheme for name
mangling.
2024-10-10 23:37:16 +00:00
Richard Smith 568ad197d1 Track the instruction used to name the type and constraint in an impl. (#4368)
This is necessary in order to have access to the specific versions of
their constant values in a generic impl.

Stub out impl deduction.
2024-10-04 00:06:55 +00:00
David BlaikieandJon Ross-Perkins 4631767943 Stop name mangling at an imported package name (#4294)
To ensure the outer package name is not mangled into imported names.

With this change I can successfully link/run a two-file example:
```
package Mod;
fn HelloWorld() {
  Core.Print(42);
}
```
```
import Mod;
fn Run() -> i32 {
  Mod.HelloWorld();
  return 0;
}
```
```
$ carbon compile mod.carbon main.carbon
$ carbon link mod.o main.o --output=a.out
$ ./a.out
42
```
\o/

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-09-18 22:01:08 +00:00
4845f40dff Switch CARBON_CHECK to a format string API (#4285)
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.

The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.

As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.

However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.

One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.

This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256      86.3µs ± 1%  82.9µs ± 1%  -3.94%  (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024      431µs ± 1%   415µs ± 1%  -3.76%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096     1.77ms ± 1%  1.71ms ± 1%  -3.18%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384    7.44ms ± 1%  7.17ms ± 2%  -3.56%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536    30.7ms ± 1%  29.7ms ± 1%  -3.15%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144    131ms ± 1%   127ms ± 1%  -2.81%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256       878µs ± 2%   800µs ± 1%  -8.91%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024     1.88ms ± 2%  1.72ms ± 1%  -8.56%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096     5.78ms ± 2%  5.28ms ± 1%  -8.70%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384    21.9ms ± 1%  20.1ms ± 1%  -8.02%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536    90.4ms ± 2%  83.1ms ± 1%  -8.04%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144    381ms ± 2%   352ms ± 1%  -7.79%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-12 16:42:08 +00:00
a548eff0bb Rudimentary name mangling support (#4267)
This seems to be enough to avoid naming collisions for functions in any
of the current test cases (verified by asserting that the name of the
`llvm::Function` matches the name passed to create it - not triggering
LLVM's numbering that happens when names collide)

It currently implements mangling for namespace scopes, class scopes, and
impls.
Nothing generic is mangled yet - haven't looked at how that works,
though evidently it's not covered by existing testing, I guess.

Follow-up change will document the current mangling algorithm in
`toolchain/docs/lower.md`

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
2024-09-06 23:10:21 +00:00