This is in anticipation of making the integer value store be customized
heavily. I'd like to extract it from the common code when doing that, so
first disentangling them here without any intended change in
functionality or behavior to enable that.
I've tried to update `#include`s to be as minimal as I can and added a
few missing includes spotted in the process.
I've split the test for value store to include what was easy focused on
just the value store templates rather than the unified shared value
stores.
This might surface some opportunities for adding more tests, but for
this PR, just doing the minimal restructuring.
This rejects type literals with more digits than we can lex without
APInt's help, and using a custom diagnostic. This is a pretty arbitrary
implementation limit, I'm wide open to even more strict rules here.
Despite no special casing and a very simplistic approach, by not using
APInt this completely eliminates the lexing overhead for `i32` in the
generated compilation benchmark where that specific type literal is very
common. We see a 10% improvement in lexing there:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/256 39.0µs ± 4% 34.8µs ± 2% -10.86% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/1024 180µs ± 1% 158µs ± 2% -12.22% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/4096 731µs ± 2% 641µs ± 1% -12.31% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/16384 3.20ms ± 2% 2.86ms ± 2% -10.47% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/65536 13.8ms ± 1% 12.4ms ± 2% -9.78% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/262144 64.0ms ± 2% 58.4ms ± 2% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
```
This starts to fix a TODO in the diagnostic for these by giving a
reasonably good diagnostic about a very large type literal. However, in
practice it regresses the diagnostics because error tokens produce noisy
extraneous diagnostics from parse and check currently. Leaving the TODO
there, and I have a follow-up PR to start improving the extraneous
diagnostics.
Trying to make split file tests of lex functionality shorter and easier
to read. numeric_literals.carbon in particular has an example of why I'm
interested in this (at the bottom). This also switches from `[]` list
format to `-` list format so that the trailing `]` is removed.
Trimming comments in tokenized_buffer.h because (1) it feels like it's
giving too much detail about what's printed, which has drifted slightly
and (2) it also feels like it's trying to justify YAML output, when
that's just what we're doing in general.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Also surround it in square brackets rather than parentheses. This
matches the format used by Clang and GCC, and means diagnostics will
still match the `file:line:col: error: ` pattern used by some IDE tools.
Before:
```console
fail_builtins.carbon:11:11: error(AliasRequiresNameRef): alias initializer must be a name reference
```
After:
```console
fail_builtins.carbon:11:11: error: alias initializer must be a name reference [AliasRequiresNameRef]
```
Also tighten up test regex to only match on `STDERR` lines that list a
file name.
Previously in an optimized build we'd produce bogus tokens, such as
tokens with incorrect IdentifierIds, and in a debug build we would try
to CHECK-fail -- but actually wouldn't, because we're incorrectly
checking for `2 << bits` instead of `1 << bits`. I hit this while I was
trying to do some profiling and was seeing some very strange
diagnostics.
The diagnostic is pointed at the first token that is beyond the limit to
help people determine where to split their files.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Use the diagnostic kind printing in #4425 to catch when we have
diagnostics with no tests.
This merges a couple other use-cases of filegroup manifests into a
common rule.
Note I do add a few tests for things, and also some things are
_actually_ unit tested (just not in the file_test structure). But I
stopped when I realized that dealing with merge conflicts is going to be
a pain. I might end up reverting test changes (as part of merge conflict
resolution) and doing narrow test additions in a separate PR, after both
this and #4425 are merged.
Building on #4411, avoid using StringLiteral in format strings. This
includes a diagnostic check to prevent regressions (which is also how I
gathered issues).
Note, I haven't looked at `std::string` uses yet, but we might need
things like that to be able to pass strings in code back to the user.
StringLiteral though means that it's literally written down in the
toolchain, at which point it should probably be written in the format
string instead of separately.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This is to help identify which diagnostics we're actually using.
Note that driver/testdata still has tests which don't pass this flag,
and so continue to test the kind-less (default) behavior.
Building on https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/4411,
replace format_provider uses (other than `TokenKind`, which is more on
the okay side of things)
Also does some edits to `ClassMemberDefinition` to try to better match
diagnostic style
This is improving the comment production to produce fewer distinct
comments.
At present, comment processing uses strict prefix matching. It either
expects `// ` (with a space) for valid comments, or just `//` (without a
space) for invalid comments that lacked the space.
As a consequence, the following would be three comments:
```
// Comment 1
//
//
// Comment 4
```
This is because a 3-character prefix is used for valid comments. The
prefix switches between lines 1 and 2, and again between lines 3 and 4,
each resulting in a separate comment.
For contrast, this is one comment because only a 2-character prefix is
used:
```
//Comment 1
//
//
//Comment 4
```
That's because all lines lack a suffix space.
Additionally, with SIMD 16-byte boundaries, further splits can occur if
processing needs to transition to non-SIMD.
Here, I'm trying to just address all of this by:
1. Stitching together adjacent comments. Since a lexed comment starts at
the `//` excluding the indent, the delta from the prior comment must be
precisely the indent.
2. Adding support for switching from SIMD to non-SIMD on file
boundaries.
I considered trying to have a separate `//\n` prefix for SIMD processing
of `// `, but I wasn't sure about the tradeoff of doing both at the same
time (in particular, it'd require constructing a string for the
different prefix), thus this stitch approach. This does mean multiple
passes will be required for a typical long comment structure using blank
comment lines to separate paragraphs (for performance reasons, I will
recommend engineers not write comm... nevermind).
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Note in particular that this fixes an issue where SharedValueStore had
been shared across files, when they should be per-file. This is only
visible when doing multiple compilations in a single test, which was
rare before.
This also moves these tests into the Testing namespace. My memory of the
various namespacing changes is that we'd generally agreed to have tests
in Testing so that we'd see SemIR:: and similar, same as we would in a
lot of the implementation.
In order to format comments, it's helpful if they're tracked. This
tracks them separately from tokens in order to avoid interfering with
parse; it'd be inconvenient if comment tokens could show up in arbitrary
locations, albeit possible to support.
This additionally extracts out the TokenIterator support into a template
in order to generally have it available for IndexBase types. I'm only
adding it for CommentInfo, not sure if we'll want it elsewhere, but this
structure still felt like a good fit.
This is a primarily automated change:
- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
- `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
- `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
- ERROR -> error
- WARNING -> warning
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Includes support for the `impls`, `=`, and `==` requirement operators to
the right of a `where`, but `and` to allow multiple requirements is
still a TODO.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This makes each token info consist of 8 bytes of data:
- 1 byte of the kind
- 1 bit for whitespace tracking
- 23 bits of payload
- 32 bits for byte offset in the file
This builds directly on representing the location of the token as
a single 32-bit offset, now compressing the rest of the data into
a single 32-bit bitfield.
This adds some implementation limits: we can no longer lex more than
2^23 tokens in a single source file. Nor can we have more than 2^23
string literals, integer literals, real literals, or identifiers. Only
the first of these is even close to an issue, and even then seems
unlikely to ever be a problem in practice.
The memory efficiency here is great and the motivating goal. But to make
this work well, we also need to streamline how we create the tokens.
Otherwise, all the bit fiddling can end up erasing our gains. This PR
adds a number of APIs to manage creating and accessing the now
significantly more complex storage of token infos to try and help with
this.
One big change required to simplify the writes here is to switch from
computing whether a token has trailing space after-the-fact to
pre-computing whether a token will have leading space. That lets us have
the leading space information available immediately when forming the
token, and avoids doing a single bit flip afterward.
Another change that helps with this representation is to minimize the
updating of groups after-the-fact. The code now tries to set the opening
index directly when creating the closing token and only updates the
opening group afterward. Because of the bit packing, this is a reduction
of 0.5% of dynamic instructions in the compile benchmark, and has
dramatic improvements for the grouping symbol focused benchmarks.
All combined, this is a significant improvement on the lexer-focused
benchmarks despite the added complexity, and a significant win on our
compile time benchmarks due to both the lexer improvements and
downstream memory density improvements: 5-12% reduction in lex time,
growing larger as files get larger. About a 4.5% reduction in parse
time, and even a 1-2% reduction in total check time. =D
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
First, this replaces the separate line index and column index in the
token information with a single 32-bit byte offset of the token. This is
then used to compute line and column numbers with a binary search of the
line structure and then using that to compute the column within the
line. In practice, this is _much_ more efficient:
- Smaller token data structure. This will hopefully combine with a
subsequent optimization PR that shrinks the token data structure still
further.
- Fewer stores to form each token's information in the tight hot loop of
the lexer.
- Less state to maintain while lexing, fewer computations while lexing.
We only have to search to build the line and column information off the
hot lexing path, and so this ends up being a significant win and shrinks
some of the more significant data structures.
Second, this shrinks the line start to a 32-bit integer and removes the
line length. Our source buffer already ensures we only have 2 GiB of
source with a nice diagnostic. I've just added a check to help document
this in the lexer. The line length can be avoided in all of the cases it
was being used, largely by looking at the next line's start and working
from there. This also precipitated cleaning up some code that dated from
when lines were only built during lexing rather than being pre-built,
which resulted in nice simplifications.
With this PR, I think it makes sense to re-name a bunch of methods on
`TokenizedBuffer`, but to an extent that was already needed as these
methods somewhat predate the more pervasive style conventions. I avoided
that here to keep this PR focused on the implementation change, I'll
create a subsequent PR to update the API to both better nomenclature and
remove deviations from our conventions.
There may also be a way to de-duplicate the binary search in the
diagnostic location conversion and the main line accessor binary search,
but it wasn't obvious to me that it would be a net savings, so left it
alone for now.
The performance impact of this varies quite a bit...
The lexer's benchmark improves pretty consistent across the board on
both x86 and Arm. For x86, where I have nice comparison tools, it
appears 3% to 20% faster depending on the specific pattern. For Arm
server CPUs at least it seems a much smaller but still an improvement.
The overall compilation benchmarks however don't improve much with these
changes alone on x86. Significant reduction in instruction count
required for lexing, but the overall performance is bottlenecked
elsewhere in the overall compilation it seems. However, on Arm, despite
the more modest gains in special cases of lexing, this shows fairly
consistent 1-2% improvements in overall lexing performance on our
compilation benchmark. And the expectaiton is these improvements will
compound with subsequent work to further compact our representation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Consolidates both main libraries into `//testing/base`, and factors out
the exe path handling for benchmarks and unit tests into a common
library to remove duplication. Refactors how that logic is managed to be
cleaner and avoid a confusing bool that came up in code review.
Updates all the tests and benchmarks that use these. I still need to
update other benchmarks to use the same main, but I wanted to keep this
PR somewhat minimal.
This also fixes a bug noticed in passing that the compilation benchmark
didn't have the required dependency on the benchmark library itself,
just the benchmark main library.
The big addition here is a very, very rough and very early skeleton of a
source code generator framework. This builds upon the lexers identifier
synthesis logic, improving on its framework and wiring it up with the
most rudimentary of source file generation. This is just enough to
roughly replicate my "big API file" source code benchmarks.
The source generation works *very* hard to both vary the structure and
content of the source as much as possible while ensuring the same
*total* amount of each construct is in use, from bytes in identifiers to
line breaks, parameters, etc. This lets us generate randomly structure
inputs that should consistently take the exact same amount of total work
to compile.
The complex identifier synthesis logic from the lexer's benchmark is
moved over here and the lexer uses APIs in the source generator for
identifiers. The other source synthesis in the lexer's benchmark isn't
yet moved over, but should likely be slowly absorbed here as it can be
refactored into a more principled and re-usable form. Some bits may stay
of course if they're just too lexer-specific.
Next, this adds a simple end-to-end compile benchmark for the driver
that directly and much more clearly reproduces all the measurements I've
done manually up until now. It should also be easy to extend to more
patterns over time as we add support to the source generator to produce
those patterns.
Last but not least, I've added a tiny CLI to the source generator so
that you can generate source code manually. This is especially nice for
generating demo source code to actually run through the driver or look
at in an editor. The CLI can also generate C++ source code which lets us
do some minimal comparative benchmarking between Carbon and C++/Clang.
There are huge number of TODOs in the source generation framework. This
is going to be a large ongoing effort I suspect.
There are also a bunch of rough edges I've left to try and get this out
for review sooner. I've left TODOs for refactorings that really need to
be done here, but hoping these can maybe be follow-ups. If not, please
flag and I'll try to layer them on here.
Sample compile benchmark output, nicely showing where we are w.r.t. our
goal speeds (2x behind on lex and check, 5x on parse) at least on a
recent AMD server CPU:
```
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations Lines
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/256 29420 ns 29419 ns 22860 6.62847M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/1024 146130 ns 146128 ns 4840 6.69959M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/4096 601584 ns 601577 ns 1020 6.69573M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/16384 2547578 ns 2547313 ns 280 6.404M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/65536 10816591 ns 10816389 ns 80 6.05193M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Lex>/262144 52191320 ns 52189828 ns 20 5.02261M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 101706 ns 101698 ns 6900 1.91745M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 512161 ns 512162 ns 1380 1.9115M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 2078426 ns 2078430 ns 340 1.938M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 8795786 ns 8795583 ns 100 1.85468M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 35073596 ns 35072973 ns 20 1.86639M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 151100688 ns 151097370 ns 20 1.73483M/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 957059 ns 957049 ns 740 203.751k/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1956134 ns 1955985 ns 360 500.515k/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5797864 ns 5797417 ns 120 694.792k/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21219608 ns 21217584 ns 40 768.843k/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 96311116 ns 96302334 ns 20 679.734k/s
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 371637963 ns 371609964 ns 20 705.387k/s
```
Lest someone think this is *bad*, the fact that we're already within 2x
of our rather audacious goals makes me quite happy. =D
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This uses a heuristic reserve to greatly reduce hashtable growth of the
identifiers hashtable. The design of the hashtable itself is optimized
around compact memory use and is especially slow to grow and so this has
an outsized impact.
The heuristic was computed using `scripts/source_stats.py` and looking
at C++ codebases. We may want to periodically re-evaluate it as Carbon
code emerges and we have better data on its distributions of tokens.
This also required fixing the `Reserve` method on `CanonicalValueStore`
that wasn't actually used anywhere and so didn't even compile correctly.
I added it to the relevant unit test so it is at least compiled locally
to its definition.
It turns out we can make these work with very minimal complexity because
the LF is still in the right place either way. This also lets us easily
support mixtures of LF and CR+LF line endings gracefully. We create the
line structures around the LF bytes and then have the byte-dispatch loop
notice a CR followed by an LF and skip to the LF behavior.
Rather than add the remaining complexity around supporting bare CR and
LF+CR sequences (both of which are quite rare now), this just adds
diagnostics when we encounter a CR byte that won't fall out of our CR+LF
handling. This is a better experience for users than the alternative. We
still have a TODO to handle the full complexity of vertical whitespace,
but I've updated it to reflect that the common case should be handled
already.
This isn't complete though: we need to add support in string literal
lexing, and we need to teach the diagnostic rendering to handle the
error messages above better. But those will be future PRs, this is
enough to unblock folks who happen to edit a Carbon source file with
notepad on Windows which seems important.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Playing with the macro suggestion on #4028, replace DeclKind with some
templating that asserts the in-use token is an introducer token. This
allows type-safe usage of Lex::TokenKind, reducing the benefit of a
separate enum while improving stdout (since now this will ostream as the
keyword name).
Most of these are places where we failed to include a header file and
simply never got an error about this. The fix is to include the header
file.
Most other cases are functions that should have been marked `static` but
were not. Finding all of these was a main motivation for me enabling the
warning despite how much work it is.
One complicating factor was that we weren't including the `handle.h` for
all the state-based handler functions. While this isn't a tiny amount of
code, it is just declarations and doesn't add any extra dependencies. It
also lets us have the checking for which functions need to be `static`
and which don't. For the `parse` library I had to add the `handle.h`
header as well, I tried to match the design of it in `check`.
I have also had to work around a bug in the warning, but given the value
it seems to be providing, that seems reasonable. I've filed the bug
upstream: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94138
I also had to use some hacks to work around limitations of Bazel rules
that wrap `cc_library` rules and don't expose `copts`. I filed a bug for
`cc_proto_library` specifically:
~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/22610~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/4446
This has is a nice-to-have for me. Frequently I want to run a specific
test, and end up digging through output to be able to copy-paste the run
line. This uses TIP lines to inject the command into the file when using
AUTOUPDATE.
Note, one of the reasons I want this is because "bazel test
//toolchain/testing:file_test --test_output=all" has been regularly
exceeding bazel's output limit for me (workaround is either opening the
output file or specifying an obscure output limit flag), making it a
little harder for me to get the commands. However, frequently I'm adding
a file and want to iterate on it, so that's really the use case I have
in mind here.
Instead of adding a `Token<Kind>` field to typed parse nodes that
contains a `TokenIndex`, make the parse node directly hold a
`TokenIndex` of a more specific kind.
Just spotted these while looking at warnings that seem to fire on our
code are probably are things we'd fix if we saw them. None of these seem
important FWIW.
Also removes a redundant flag that is part of `-Wall`.
I have a follow-up for the high-value warning I spotted that motivated
me to look at all of this. But it's noisy so kept it as a separate PR.
Instead of tracking the token associated with a parse node in the `.def`
file macro, track it on the typed node instead. List the token as a
field inside the node structure to show the order of the token relative
to the other components of the grammar production, and to allow the
token index to be accessed when the node is extracted.
Remove the corresponding information from the `.def` file, leaving
behind just a list of parse node kinds in the majority of cases.
This also removes the checking of the token kind associated with a parse
node in the case where the parse node has errors. Previously we had a
flag on the node kind to indicate whether we should check this, but per
[discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1246214418979881052),
we have decided to remove this.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Change syntax for package declaration to put the `impl` keyword at the
start and remove the `api` keyword.
To support this, rearrange processing of package, library, and import
declarations to use the general modifier handling support in declaration
parsing rather than special-case logic.
There is an ambiguity in `impl package.Foo as Bar`, which we resolve by
treating `package` as an introducer after a modifier only if it's not
followed by `.`.
This provides `export import` logic in lex, parse, and check; `export
name` logic is only in lex and parse, not check.
I think with `export name` I'm going to need to modify import_ref and
some consolidation logic, whereas `export import` seems feasible to keep
as primarily import logic. Given the implementations were looking like
they'd diverge more substantially, I thought it'd be helpful to cut the
PR here.
This largely reproduces the upstream one, but has a few advantages:
1) It initializes LLVM which can be important if we use the backends.
2) It parses commandline flags with Abseil allowing the use of Abseil
flags in benchmarks.
3) It flips the default for tabular display of results which we use
pretty heavily.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
`i32` is retained as a special case for now, for bootstrapping purposes,
and maps to `BuiltinIntType`, which is distinct from `Core.Int(32)`.
This will be removed later once we support `Core.BigInt`.
For now this provides both the `iN` types and also the builtins to
support `Core.Int(N)`. The intent is that we'll change the `iN` support
to rewrite to calls here when we do that for the other type literals and
type keywords.
No conversions between integer types are supported yet, and all literals
are of type `i32`, so we can't actually form values of any of these new
types.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
The expected parse tree size is validated for valid parse trees, which
is possible even if lex encounters an error. In that case, we were
missing recovery tokens, resulting in a crash. AddToken should be the
only place we call `token_infos_.push_back`.
Instead of special-casing tokens starting with `r`, lex them as normal
identifiers, and add a special case to `#` handling to detect if the
previous token was an `r` identifier.
This roughly doubles the time to lex a raw identifier, because we do two
hash table insertions rather than one, and probably slightly slows down
lexing string literals starting with `#`, but should remove the 2%
overhead to identifier lexing from the previous approach.
In parse, form a list of methods that are defined inline, tracking where
they start, where they end, and which other inline methods are nested
within them.
In check, when we reach an inline method body, skip it and add it to a
worklist to be processed later. We also track when we reach the start
and end of a context in which inline method bodies are deferred, so that
we know when to replay the bodies.
When suspending a function definition to be processed later, the
`DeclNameStack` entry is moved to separate storage, including popping
the corresponding scopes from the scope stack and removing the
corresponding lexical names from lexical lookup. Later, when we return
to the function and parse its definition, the `DeclNameStack` entry is
restored. The same is done when we reach the end of a nested context
that can have inline methods, so that we can reenter the nested scope
before processing its members.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
As discussed around #3792, identify the import a diagnostic message came
from prior to the diagnostic message itself. This occurs during location
translation so that the logic can be central.
I'd considered associating the parse node with ImportRef instructions,
but I realized about halfway through that because I need to store the
ImportDirectiveId on the ImportIR for cross-package imports, it's there
for use in location translation without extra work. That saves a fair
amount of stringing it through declarations, as well as an oddity where
ImportRef instructions would have a node that didn't really represent
them.
The purpose of the newline is to make it clearer where a given
diagnostic begins and ends, particularly as the first message of a
diagnostic may not be the error.
This is a trivial code change, but ripples edits through test files.
On #3792 it was requested to put context-related diagnostic messages
prior to the diagnostic error. In order to support that, remove the
distinction that an error needs to come first on DiagnosticMessage.
Since the addition of TranslateArg, I don't think this type is going to
go away (cutting a TODO). Refactoring names slightly to fit the current
role, and adding const to ConvertLocation.
I wanted to choose one or the other. I think some code has been using
each from early on. We're predominately using `filename`, so
consolidating on that. This conveniently matches the [Google dev doc
style guide](https://developers.google.com/style/word-list#filename)
(which we use for docs) which says "filename: Not file name".
In toolchain:
```
╚╡git grep file_name . | wc -l
35
╚╡git grep filename . | wc -l
489
```
Chandler Carruth
Jon Ross-PerkinsandGeoff Romer
Richard Smith
David Blaikie
