I was suggesting this because `FloatingPoint` is pretty long. `int` and
`float` should be familiar abbreviations. `unsigned` should be familiar
to developers too, but `UnsignedInt` still feels usefully clearer for
the additional chars.
Advantages:
- Allows lexing/parsing in parallel, since they are modifying fully
separate ValueStores.
- Allows SemIR to reliably be stored hermetically.
Disadvantages:
- Creates overlapping storage of duplicate strings when multiple files
are compiled together.
- Prevents Ids from being uniquely compared cross-file.
Per discussion, the decision is that the advantages are more important.
The looser ownership remains because both SemIR checking and
metaprogramming may still generate things we would want to deduplicate.
It would be somewhat odd if TokenizedBuffer owned something that
checking modified.
Provides an adapter for the llvm::yaml API because it otherwise needs a
bunch of const/non-const definitions, and the traits are difficult to
diagnose issues with. The current approach is pretty simple to use, even
if it's not super efficient (which, yaml output is more of a debugging
thing so I'm not really expecting it to be an issue).
Changes the format of yaml output to provide more index information,
just as reminders when seeing something like `node+0`. Note this would
create more churn in deltas if we were reliant on the output yaml in
tests, but we aren't so it should be okay.
This standardizes on having ValueStore and related structures provide
printing, removing the handlers in file.cpp.
The `[]` is provided for empty sequences versus if there was simply
nothing, in which case it would be a sequence when non-empty, and a null
value when empty. Consistently (and explicitly) providing sequences
feels easier to understand.
The changes to the output yaml are overall more terse. My hope is that
this is an improvement for most readers.
Also fixes printing of APInt, defaulting to unsigned for consistency
with Carbon's use.
This replaces the printing that was removed from SemIR's raw dump. It's
separate because (for example) lexing generates shared values, and so
reviewing them is not specific to any particular phase.
Jon Ross-Perkins