I was suggesting this because `FloatingPoint` is pretty long. `int` and
`float` should be familiar abbreviations. `unsigned` should be familiar
to developers too, but `UnsignedInt` still feels usefully clearer for
the additional chars.
These are manual fixes; mostly from clang-tidy, some from clangd (which
notes unused includes).
In typed_insts, adding inlline due to misc-definitions-in-headers. Per
discussion, clang-tidy is wrong, but inline silences it.
For parameter name skew in definition versus declaration, I'm just using
the name from the definition.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This gets to a lifetime subtlety, particularly with things like the
sorting diagnostic consumer that delay output. In order to reduce the
chance of accidental references, disallow StringRef in the diagnostics.
For example:
```
./toolchain/diagnostics/diagnostic_emitter.h:162:5: error: static_assert failed due to requirement '!std::is_same_v<llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef>' "Use std::string or llvm::StringLiteral for diagnostic lifetimes."
static_assert(
^
toolchain/check/convert.cpp:477:11: note: in instantiation of member function 'Carbon::Internal::DiagnosticBase<std::string, std::string, llvm::StringRef>::DiagnosticBase' requested here
CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC(StructInitMissingFieldInConversion, Error,
^
./toolchain/diagnostics/diagnostic_emitter.h:47:7: note: expanded from macro 'CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC'
::Carbon::Internal::DiagnosticBase<__VA_ARGS__>( \
^
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Per [#toolchain
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1176632520834560211)
We'd at one point been trying to put `[[nodiscard]]` everywhere, but
then we stopped because it had felt verbose without finding many issues
(plus, people plain forgot to add it). Some history in #888.
Since newer code gets added without it, we now have code like:
```
auto GetLineInfo(Line line) -> LineInfo&;
[[nodiscard]] auto GetLineInfo(Line line) const -> const LineInfo&;
auto AddLine(LineInfo info) -> Line;
auto GetTokenInfo(Token token) -> TokenInfo&;
[[nodiscard]] auto GetTokenInfo(Token token) const -> const TokenInfo&;
auto AddToken(TokenInfo info) -> Token;
[[nodiscard]] auto GetTokenPrintWidths(Token token) const -> PrintWidths;
```
Here, the lack of `[[nodiscard]]` doesn't mean anything: for example,
`GetLineInfo` should not have its result discarded if it's called. But
the mix could be confusing for readers.
As a resolution, remove the attribute. `[[nodiscard]]` should be treated
like other attributes going forward, which essentially means "avoid in
general, add a comment to explain why the attribute is needed" rather
than use-as-default.
This is an incremental improvement on our diagnostic messages that
simply underlines an entire token if the token is larger than 1 char
(else it points to the single char with a caret like it used to).
This should cover:
```
library "lib" api;
import Foo library default;
import library default;
import library "lib";
```
This splits out `PackageName` and `LibraryName` to their own parse nodes
so that checking can ignore them and still get a balanced parse tree
(otherwise, we essentially need to implement handling of the parse nodes
only to remove the identifiers/string literals -- the optional names
mean we can't blindly do that as before). For reference, these nodes
don't need to be handled because CheckParseTree will need to directly
funnel import information along with checked IRs.
A struct with the same member name twice can cause a `CARBON_CHECK`
failure later when it is used (problem found by fuzzing).
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
As I was working on this, I noticed `import` and `library` syntax needs
to be fixed for how it imports the current package, and for `Main`
libraries. This mostly reflects the current state in its testing.
Otherwise, this should handle most of the errors I could think of:
dependency cycles, redundant imports, etc.
It does not actually deal with the nuances of cross-IR references.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
For now, we require the same introducer to be used each time a class is
declared, but see #3384.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Implement toolchain support for `returned var` and `return var`.
- Modeled `returned` in the parse tree as a `ReturnedSpecifier`
appearing after the `VariableIntroducer`.
- Modeled `return var` in the parse tree as a `ReturnVarSpecifier`
appearing after the `ReturnStatementStart`.
- Factored out the implementation of `return` statement and `returned
var` handling in check into a new `return.{h,cpp}`. The parse nodes
themselves are still handled in `handle_*.cpp`. This allows easy code
reuse between `return` and `returned var`.
This turns out to somewhat block `package` support because there's a
fuzzer test-case that does similar. The parse is valid so we should
probably handle it reasonably.
I suspect the `let` test case might work with a little effort, given it
shouldn't really require much evaluation. On the other hand, `var`
definitely shouldn't, and `fn` will probably require something like
`constexpr` plus more substantial compile-time evaluation support.
This detects ordering issues with the `package` and `import` statements.
`library` is changed from package-specific to instead be generic between
the two, since structurally it's non-specific.
The next step would be to start exposing the results for the driver to
make ordering decisions for checking. That'll involve further
modifications to this code, but this felt like a reasonable change point
because it's the extent of the parser enforcement, and still causes
significant refactoring.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
For now, we treat class types and `String` as non-copyable, because we
don't know how to emit SemIR to copy them yet. This will change as we
add support for copying those types when appropriate.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Adds a `BoundMethod` SemIR node to represent an `x.F` bound method, with
a new builtin type `BoundMethodType`. Reorganized conversion of call
expression arguments to also check and convert a `self` parameter in the
implicit parameters list.
In passing, improved diagnostics and error recovery for bad call
expressions. We now build a `call` node with the appropriate type and
value category, but with invalid arguments, if the argument conversion
failed, and diagnose calls to non-callable expressions.
`addr self` methods don't work properly yet; the `addr` is ignored for
now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Add support for member access into classes, for both non-instance
members and for fields.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Track the fields in a class, and generate a corresponding struct type as
the object representation for the class. For now, we always use a
pointer as the value representation for a class.
This includes being able to define a class that was previously
forward-declared, and being able to define a member function out-of-line
that was previously declared inside a class.
No support for fields or methods yet, and a class definition doesn't yet
cause the class to be treated as a complete type.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Incomplete types may be nested within other types; for example, a tuple
type might have an incomplete type as an element. Handle such cases by
walking through nested incomplete types when completing a type. This is
done non-recursively in case a very complex type is formed.
Types are generally no longer completed at the point where they're
formed. Instead, we attempt to complete a type when it is used in a
context that requires a complete type, and diagnose if the type cannot
be completed at that point. This will be necessary for classes, which
can become complete after their first use, and helps tease out bugs
where a type completeness check is missing.
A `let` declaration is represented by a `bind_name` node in SemIR:
```carbon-semir
%b: i32 = bind_name "b", %a
```
Because `Check` encounters the pattern before it sees the value, we
first create the `bind_name` node with an unset value and don't add it
to the block. Then, once we've seen and converted the initializer, we
update the `bind_name` to have the value and add it to the current
block, after the initializer code.
Combine the initialization, implicit conversion, and value category
conversion functions into a single function.
This substantially reduces the duplication between these steps, and
ensures that we support the same set of conversions in all these
contexts. This also fixes some issues where we would not use the proper
value representation for tuples and structs after performing implicit
conversions.
This makes the difference between errors and lower-level diagnostics
visible to users, and aligns the toolchain's behavior with the
expectations in `driver_fuzzer.cpp`.
This implements initializing expression semantics for structs and
tuples, following #2006 and discussions since.
Tuple and (and analogously, struct) literals are treated as having a
mixed expression category that is later resolved based on how the
literal is used, as either a tuple initializer or a tuple value, at
which point we create a `TupleInit` or `TupleValue` that represents the
formation of the tuple initializer or tuple value from the tuple
literal.
There's quite a lot of TODOs here, and the SemIR representation is still
not quite right, but this seems like a good place to checkpoint some
incremental progress.
Rationale: this convention avoids forcing closely-related code to be far
apart in the namespace hierarchy, and vice versa. By the same token, it
makes the namespace hierarchy more consistent with the directory
hierarchy.
Instead of modeling array initialization as a thin wrapper around tuple
initialization, handle it like a function call, with a return slot as
part of its input. This better matches how initialization via a call to
`ImplicitAs::Convert` will eventually work, and in particular lets us do
in-place initialization of arrays rather than always creating a
temporary.
In order to maintain diagnostic quality, add a mechanism to add notes to
any diagnostics that are produced as part of initialization of function
parameters. As suggested in review of #3205.
In passing, fix the only caller of `ImplicitAsRequired` outside of the
implementation of `Check::Context` to instead use
`ConvertToValueExpressionOfType`. This causes some missing
`value_binding` nodes to be added to the produced SemIR. Also fixed a
matching bug in lowering where a bogus load was being added, that
resulted in assertion failures when the checker bug was fixed.
The warning `-Wnon-virtual-dtor` starts producing false-positive
warnings after this change. Replace it with the fixed version,
`-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor`.
This updates SourceBuffer to diagnostics. Some additional edits to
diagnostics were necessary due to issues moving arguments around, which
seems to stem from a compile error with clang 14 (fixed in later
versions).
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Continuing on #3070.
I moved ParseTree::Node to just Parse::Node, versus Parse::Tree::Node.
Other name changes are just removing "Parse" or "Parser" prefixes.
In EnumBase, I'm directly defining operator<< because the ostream.h
approach just isn't working, not for either of Parse::State nor
Parse::NodeKind. Errors look like:
```toolchain/parser/parser_context.cpp:449:34: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('llvm::raw_ostream' and 'const Carbon::Parse::State')
output << "\t" << i << ".\t" << entry.state;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~
```
The expected template in `Carbon::` is not in the error list; I only see
the:
```
./common/ostream.h:112:6: note: candidate template ignored: requirement 'std::is_base_of_v<std::ostream, llvm::raw_ostream>' was not satisfied [with S = llvm::raw_ostream, T = Carbon::Parse::State]
auto operator<<(S& standard_out, const T& value) -> S& {
^
```
I'm still prodding at this, but not seeing an obvious fix.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
A lot of this is more boring "remove unused header", plus some other
minor cleanups. I think the most significant changes were:
- yaml_test_helpers.cpp is doing a switch on an unsigned int, comparing
to enum values.
-
[bugprone-switch-missing-default-case](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/switch-missing-default-case.html)
is unhappy with EnumBase, but correctly identified
yaml_test_helpers.cpp, so I'm opting to address it rather than disabling
it even though it needs NOLINT in several locations as a result, in
addition to what I think are some low-value `default` cases. I'd be fine
going the other way with this too and disabling it globally (I could see
it being noisier in the explorer).
- MarkInitializerFor swaps the argument names between the .h and .cpp. I
think the .cpp had the order as intended.
- There's a new-ish
[performance-enum-size](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance/enum-size.html)
which I'm basically treating as "add int8_t to enums".
My main motivation here is to just clean up as many of these as I can so
that I stop seeing them in vscode.
Trying to improve diagnostic names and code flow. I was thinking
"operand" might be a better name than "name" in the context of what `a`
is in `a[b]`, where we already call `b` the `index`.
Flow-wise, note this replaces pushing BuiltinError with instead creating
Index nodes that may contain an error. This is intended to aim towards
producing a more consistent SemIR in the face of errors. There are pros
and cons of both approaches, but I'm aiming for simpler control flow.
The main motivation for this is to get python loads in using the
`native-py` lint fix. However, enabling that made me wonder, maybe we
should fix in general?
`native-cc` is delayed, but not wholly cancelled (and `native-py`
picking up might indicate `native-cc` won't be too far behind). There's
also some automated fixes for `.append` and dict sorting -- this felt
okay to me, maybe not something to eagerly add but probably not worth
stopping buildifier from fixing (I've noticed the warnings in the past
and had been ignoring them).
Running everything does mean that load orders are sorted automatically
now, which I think is a positive. Most generally, I think these fixes
aren't _harmful_, and having them done automatically seems beneficial:
my biggest concern about `native-py` and `native-cc` was actually that
regressions wouldn't be caught, but this addresses that issue
automatically.
We already needed to manually flush diagnostics along every path out of
the driver, so switch to a CHECK-failure if we get this wrong rather
than a potential use-after-lifetime bug.
Switch the driver to flush explicitly rather than using a bunch of
cleanup lambdas, now that we have checking that we get this right.
This is a follow-up after #3126.
Richard Smith
josh11b
Jon Ross-Perkins
Jacob Schneider
Geoff Romer