Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins d8be774b8b Lowering support for overloaded operators. (#3798)
Fix a collection of issues that were preventing lowering for overloaded
operators from working.

Instead of creating `import_ref` instructions during name lookup in the
current block, whatever that might be, we now create them in the `file`
block always. This avoids inserting them into blocks that might not be
intended to contain them, such as functions, and avoids the IR generated
for a function depending on which names we happen to have looked up
first.

When importing a class, function, or interface, import its enclosing
scope ID. This is necessary to allow us to distinguish between functions
at interface scope, which shouldn't be lowered, and other functions, and
will also be used in future to provide qualified names for declarations
when printing types. In order to support this:

- Track the constant values of namespaces created during importing so
that we can find them when resolving an import ref. Use those constant
values to convert an enclosing scope ID from the imported IR into a
corresponding ID in the current IR.
- Change how we do two-pass import of classes and namespaces so that we
can do two-pass import even for non-defining declarations, so that we
can import the enclosing scope.

While working on the final point above, I reworked `TryResolveInst` to
return a flag indicating whether another pass is necessary instead of
implicitly encoding this in the `ConstantId`. This permits the handling
of classes to be simplified; now `import_ir_constant_values` is only
accessed in a single place.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
2024-03-20 23:32:44 +00:00
Jon Ross-Perkins 2fee4d072f Factor param/arg ref logic to a class. (#3728)
Just segmenting out a chunk of logic while I'm thinking about function
parameters.
2024-02-27 19:58:19 +00:00
Gıyaseddin Tanrıkulu bdff7ccf28 Add GlobalInit to blocks to emit initialization instructions for globals (#3687)
`GlobalInit` block is now static block within a `SemIR` which will be
used to emit initialization instructions for variables in the `Package`
scope.

inst_block_stack now has additional methods to handle `GlobalInit` block
separately, this block can be popped without being finalized allowing to
accumulate between all instances of variables.

At the end of the `check` phase, if this block is not empty , the
function `__global_init` will be added with this block being inserted
into it.

This block is pushed to `inst_block_scope` at the end `BindName`,
allowing instruction to be emitted into it, then popped at the semicolon
(VariableDecl).

This significantly changes the `SemIR` output, that's why this commit
updates a lot of the test cases.
2024-02-09 16:21:57 +00:00
Richard Smith 906346cf35 Ensure we evaluate instructions created in uncommon ways. (#3598)
Instructions created by splices during conversion are now evaluated, as
are instructions created in cases where we first create a placeholder
instruction and later replace it by a different instruction.

This also removes the ability to set a parse node and instruction
independently after creating an `InstId`, which could lead to them
accidentally not matching.
2024-01-16 21:28:14 +00:00
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith f197219c10 Split parse nodes out from instructions because they're rarely used. (#3590)
The parse nodes are still tracked as part of the same value store
interface in order to ensure parity, but they're split out from Inst
itself in order to reduce the size of Inst -- the expectation is that
they don't need to be passed around quite as much.

This change doesn't actually reduce the passing very much, although
there are hints of it: AddInstAndPush doesn't typically need a separate
parse node from the one on the Inst itself, for example. In a couple
spots I changed code to rely a little more on the InstId until the
ParseNode is needed, but it's very low hanging fruit where done. I think
convert could do more to not eagerly fetch the parse node before its
use, but more cleanup felt it would be easier to handle separately. I'm
currently viewing this as making such cleanup _possible_ rather than
executing on it up-front.

But also, I want to make sure there's a consensus to head in this
direction before pulling the trigger. We speculated that this would
result in the parse node being passed around less, and I do think that's
the case, although it's a bit fuzzy in the change.

---------

Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
2024-01-12 19:01:51 +00:00
josh11b 737162cc8f Rename sem_ir files node->inst, follow up to #3355 (#3361) 2023-11-02 19:40:41 +00:00