Build a `SpecificConstant` (if needed) and `NameRef` instruction when
referencing the thunk target from a thunk. The former is necessary if
the impl is generic in order to call the right version of the thunk
target. This previously caused a crash in lowering.
Also add some more check testing for the interaction of thunks and
generics. This testing uncovered an unrelated bug with thunks for
generic interface functions for which I've added a TODO.
Undo changes that were meant to prevent use of a reference into
`ValueStore` after being invalidated. After #5576, the `ValueStore`
makes such references stable, so there's no need to worry about
invalidation.
No functionality change right now: we reject thunks where the signature
has no return type and the callee has a return type. But discarding the
expression is still the right thing to do.
Instead of building the definition of a thunk immediately when we
generate the thunk declaration, wait until we reach the `}` of the
outermost class, interface, etc. -- at the same time when we would parse
the definition of the thunk if it were defined inline.
This fixes issues where we fail to define the thunk because it requires
an enclosing class to be complete, or its definition depends on
something declared later in the enclosing class.
Make the representation of a suspended function scope, and its
constituent suspended components, be move-only, and switch to passing it
around by rvalue reference instead of by value because it's expensive
both to move and especially to copy.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>