This follows up on a discussion about wanting to use `Any*` inst
clusters to handle boilerplate construction, with the issue that
`UncheckedLoc` use removes validation. Some context is at
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/6930#discussion_r2963157428.
This folds in `MakeImportedLocIdAndInst` because the logic is related,
particularly for `LocId` values which are `ImportIRInstId`, and it
eliminates questions of what the right function is to use.
This uncovers an error in the `NodeKind` associated with
`FormBindingPattern`. For now I'm just adding a TODO regarding that.
Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini
Based on review feedback on
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/6215#discussion_r2430177644
There are some intermediate commits with alternatives, finding other
ways (non-templates) to address the layering boundaries between
`ValueStore` construction and `CheckIRId` tagging. But, yeah, template
seems like the way to go - certainly in terms of terseness and probably
in terms of extensibility to other Id tagging as/when needed.
Use the `CheckIRId` as a unique identifier for the scope of an `InstId`
- if an `InstId` is created within the scope of one `CheckIRId` it must
not be used in the scope of a different `CheckIRId`.
This is achieved without extra storage, but with false negatives for
large inputs.
When an `InstId` is created, the original index of the `Inst` is XORed
with a tag derived from the `CheckIRId` to produce the final `InstId`.
When the `InstId` is used, the expected tag is XORed with the `InstId`
to get back to the original index - if the tags don't match, the
resulting index will be corrupted, likely too large - resulting in an
out of bounds index CHECK-failure.
(the tag value is derived as such:
* take the CheckIRId
* left shift one bit (padding zero)
* left shift another bit (padding 1 - used to signify that the resulting
`InstId` has a tag combined into it)
* reverse the bits
In this way, the tag is unlikely to overlap with the index for small
test cases - making it possible to separate out the `CheckIRId` from the
index in these cases to provide more meaningful debugging/CHECK
messages, and more informative `SemIR` textual dumping that can now
include the `CheckIRId` along with the `Inst`'s index in the name of an
`inst`)
The test churn here is improved printing as tagged `InstId`s can now,
with best effort (more likely for small test cases where the `CheckIRId`
and the `Inst` index aren't at risk of overlapping from the high and low
bits), render the `CheckIRId` as part of the inst's name. Going from
`instNN` to `irMM.instNN`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Instead of building an eval block as a separate pass at the end of a
generic, build the eval block incrementally.
The larger change here is that asking for the type or constant value of
an instruction now always returns an unattached type or constant value,
in order to preserve the behavior that we previously achieved by doing
the rewrite to attached types and constant values at the end of handling
the generic.
This also incidentally fixes some subtle issues where attached types and
constant values would leak out into check and cause it to get confused
about differences between attached and unattached values. Check should
no longer see attached values except where it explicitly asks for them.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
Switch from recursing into non-canonical instruction fields to
separately canonicalizing those fields. This means we now form canonical
`InstBlockId`s, `TypeBlockId`s, `IntId`s, `FloatId`s, and `BindNameId`s
at least in the cases when they're referenced by a constant instruction.
This reduces the overall runtime for @chandlerc's 10MLoC example by
27.5% on my machine.
Provide a general mechanism for determining the kind of the args of an
instruction. Use this to simplify instruction profiling a little. The
intent is to also use this mechanism as the basis of a substitution
mechanism, which will be part of a future patch.
Note that this causes us to do three table lookups and two indirect
calls in inst_profile per instruction, instead of one table lookup and
one indirect call. We can revisit this if it shows up in profiles.
Recent runs of `clang-tidy` for me started showing more errors, and this
is a collection of changes to address them.
First, I've systematically applied the disabling tag to all C++ rules
under //explorer/... with `buildozer` so we don't spend time analyzing
this code or reporting errors from it. Not sure this was strictly
necessary, but it seemed like a nice consistency improvement.
Next, I disabled a buggy check for missing `default` cases in
`switch`es. It seems to get confused by the fancy conversions in our
`enum_base.h`. We don't miss much with this as the Clang compiler
warnings for `switch` catch most of our actual bugs. I also removed the
local disabling of this now that it is turned off centrally.
Lastly, I added error checking to two file descriptor manipulating calls
in the `file_test` infrastructure.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Add a mechanism to define instruction categories, to support inspecting
the common representation of similar kinds of instruction. Use that
mechanism to make formatting of branch instructions slightly more
type-safe.
The idea here is to use the existing `Inst` mechanism for converting to
and from structs, extended to operate on a struct representing multiple
different kinds of instruction. In this case, the concrete kind of
instruction is stored in the struct in a `kind` field, rather than being
implied by the type.
Factored out of #3555 where this mechanism is used to provide a common
interface for runtime and symbolic name bindings.
Jon Ross-Perkins
David Blaikie
Thomas Köppe
josh11b