- Explicitly document that `*Param` and `*ParamPattern` insts represent
`Call` parameters.
- Stop wrapping compile-time parameter patterns in `ValueParamPattern`
insts (because they aren't `Call` parameters).
- Document how `MatchContext::results_` relates to the `Call`
parameters, and be more consistent about when it's written to.
- Remove `RuntimeParamIndex::Unknown`: we no longer need to distinguish
"this `Param`'s runtime index is unknown" from "this `Param` isn't a
runtime param", because we no longer use `Param`s at all in the latter
case.
- Rename `RuntimeParamIndex` to `CallParamIndex`.
As a side effect of removing the `ValueParamPattern` insts, this fixes a
minor diagnostic bug where `NoteInitializingParam` didn't identify the
specific parameter that led to a deduction failure, because it expects
generic parameters to only be represented by `SymbolicBindingPattern`s,
but before this change they could be wrapped in `ValueParamPattern`s.
This adds support for choice types at a similar level to that of a C
enum, where each alternative has a name but no additional
data/parameters attached to it. We generate a TODO diagnostic if
parameters are specified.
Because there's no extra data, the storage is a simple unsigned integer
discriminant of the smallest possible size.
A choice without any alternatives is not constructible. A choice with a
single alternative is, and has an empty tuple in place of a discriminant
since it has only one state. The empty tuple is used to make the class
non-constructible. This can be improved.
Each alternative is turned into a let binding on the choice that is a
value of the choice with that alternative set as the active one in the
discriminant. This isn't possible to write in user code with a class
right now, since the let binding has the same type as the choice
(which is a class) it is within. It's possible to generate it in semir
however by adding the binding after the class is marked complete.
This in particular uses free functions because it's likely to end up
more consistent with types (versus a wrapper object for InstStore).
Note, this is unlikely to have a performance impact, but if it does, we
can look into related approaches (and we've already discussed using
LTO).
Renames `PendingBlock::AddInst` to `PendingBlock::Add` because
`MakeElementAccessInst` expects the matching name to exist.
This creates a new check/type.h for most logic, and also moves some
functions to TypeStore in sem_ir/type.h. My approach for TypeStore is to
focus on moving the read-only functions there.
Change parse tree from `template (T:! type)` to `(template T):! type`,
so that we have information about whether a binding is a template
binding available when forming the representation of the binding
pattern. This incidentally fixes a bug that we would accept `template
addr A:! B` instead of the intended `addr template A:! B`.
Track whether a symbolic binding is a template binding on the
`EntityName` object. I'm borrowing a bit from the `CompileTimeBindIndex`
for this in order to avoid making `EntityName`s larger. Longer-term, we
should think about using a different representation for symbolic
bindings, to avoid including these fields in all `EntityName`s, but
that's out of scope for this change.
So far, template bindings are treated as having the same phase as
checked bindings, but that will change in a future PR.
Note this mirrors parse_tree().packaging_decl().is_impl, but I'm
preferring to keep the version that doesn't access the parse tree so
that we could change tree storage without hurting as much.
Note this is building on #4927 which factors out RegionStack, because
this heavily uses the region stack. However, it's a more complex level
of logic that appears specific to pattern handling.
I've moved InsertHere to pattern_match.cpp because it appears to be in
specific use there.
context.cpp is getting large, so I'm looking at a few ways to cut out
clusters of functions. This felt like a logical cluster of functions to
move to their own file.
Note I have two commits in this PR: one moving the functionality to a
new file, and one specifically changing TypeCompleter to use out-of-line
function implementations. This is to assist reviewability.
Add a full entity representation for associated constants, and build a
`Generic` object for them. This `Generic` is parameterized by the
enclosing `Self` type, allowing the use of `Self` within the type of the
associated constant to be supported.
When performing impl lookup for an associated constant, produce the type
with the provided self type substituted for its `Self` along with any
generic parameters of the interface.
Split the handling of associated constant declarations into two parts,
corresponding to the code before the `=`, and the code between the `=`
and `;` (if any). The former goes into the generic declaration region;
the latter into the generic definition region. This prepares us to
handle the default value for an associated constant, but for now we're
just storing the information and not actually using it.
Remove the entity type field from `assoc_entity_type`, because it's
almost unused and is an attractive nuisance -- it must necessarily be a
type in the generic scope of the associated constant rather than in the
scope of the instruction (because there is no `Self` anywhere else),
which means that it's hard to substitute into or derive meaning from.
See `toolchain/check/testdata/impl/assoc_const_self.carbon` for tests of
the new functionality; these used to cause the toolchain to crash.
This is a followup from #4834, I searched for "invalid" uses in our
codebase. This is mostly changing comments, and a couple debug
functions, but shouldn't affect testable behavior.
Note a couple things I'll highlight as not changing (but could) are:
- `ReturnTypeInfo::is_valid`
- `"invalid"` uses in the formatter
- `AddInvalid` for `!has_value` in `inst_fingerprinter` (because the
cases it's called sound invalid-ish)
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
The "templated for consistency" variants felt a little confusing when I
was working on #4795, so suggesting to remove templating where it's not
helpful to instantiate (particularly when there were both templated and
non-templated variants). Note this leaves a `PeekIs<IdT>` because
there's indirection there, but that's more the exception than the rule.
This is a precondition for enabling the new pattern-matching subsystem
to support binding patterns that have `if` expressions in the type
position.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
When a generic requires a symbolic type to be complete, add a new
`require_complete_type` instruction to the generic eval block. During
monomorphization of such an instruction, require that type to be
complete.
`ids.h` and `ids.cpp` are the manual edits, everything else is
search-and-replace.
The full list of things moved is:
- `TypeId::TypeType`
- `TypeId::AutoType`
- `TypeId::Error`
- `ConstantId::Error`
This is to unblock removing `InstId::Builtin*`.
We considered a couple of other options for this:
* https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/4515 Keep the
`ElementIndex` numbering vptr-ignorant, and do +1 offsets as needed -
seems subtle/easy to miss
* https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/4517 Always have a
zeroth element in the object representation, make it zero-size in the
case of no-vptr - @zygoloid was concerned this would add overhead
especially to stateless objects used in type-trait-like things.
But currently moving forward with this direction - of initializing field
indexes with an invalid value until the end of the class definition,
then assigning field indexes during construction of the class's object
representation struct type. This direction might reinforce/help avoid
premature access to the object representation before the class is
complete, and give a single place where class layout is done (at class
completion) if we want to add more options there, such as class layout
optimizations, etc.
This patch still has problems with object initialization (that #4515
does not have/does address) but does address normal `obj.member` access
correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This is for more clearly distinct names, and to make it a clearer
transition from `BuiltinInst` for name conflicts. `FloatType` is also an
instruction, and we have `Carbon::Error` (common/error.h). This avoids
affecting tests, although the name is embedded in the builtin test.
In `LegacyFloatType`, `Legacy` because I was having trouble coming up
with a more appropriate name. I'm not clear this is a `FloatLiteralType`
at present, it needs some work to mirror `IntLiteralType`.
In `ErrorInst`, the suffix `Inst` was discussed as good and similar to
`BuiltinInst` (although I'm trying to get rid of that).
This is primarily to free up space in the BindingPattern insts, but as a
side effect it moves the link between BindingPattern and its BindName
out of the SemIR, and into a transient data structure in Context.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This converts `StructTypeField` from an instruction to a dedicated type,
with its own store. This had originated from discussing how
`.GetAs<SemIR::StructTypeField>` was more prevalent than for other
instructions, but is probably more interesting for the storage savings
(16 bytes StructTypeField + 4 byte LocId + 4 byte InstId -> 8 byte
StructTypeField).
Due to the different structure, these now have their own stack during
construction, reducing (but not eliminating) `args_type_info_stack_`
use-cases.
The test changes of different InstIds is expected because structs and
classes generate fewer instructions now. Other than that, results should
remain the same.
I'm generally trying to avoid unrelated cleanup here due to the PR size,
though I did scrutinize the `VerifyOnFinish` calls, adding one and
commenting others (putting them in member order because that's how I was
checking what was verified and what wasn't).
- Generate runtime indices as part of pattern matching, rather than as a
separate postprocessing/rewriting step.
- In contexts where runtime parameters aren't permitted, avoid emitting
insts for them to begin with, rather than trying to detect the problem
and rewrite the IR to remove them later on.
Note, this supports plurals, but doesn't apply it anywhere. I'm mainly
doing that to demonstrate the approach regarding syntax. See
format_providers.h for details.
Also propagate the pattern IR along with the pattern-match IR, and use
it where appropriate.
Strictly speaking, some parts of the pattern-match IR are allocated
eagerly, while traversing the pattern's parse tree, but they still
aren't actually emitted until we traverse the associated pattern insts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
A good first-pass, at least. (abstract adapters are rejected with this
change, though pending further language design discussion)
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Instead of stringifying types in the caller in some cases, add new types
to represent:
- `InstIdAsType`: an `InstId` diagnostic argument that represents a type
expression that should be included in the diagnostic
- `InstIdAsTypeOfExpr`: an `InstId` diagnostic argument that represents
an expression whose type should be included in the diagnostic
For these cases, we can produce more user-friendly descriptions of a
type than we can with a canonicalized `TypeId`. Add comments to
discourage using `TypeId` diagnostic arguments when one of the above can
be used, and move over existing uses where it's straightforward to do
so.
Move type stringification code to its own files and out of `SemIR::File`
to make `File` smaller and to further discourage the direct use of the
stringification logic.
Also update type printing to include the `` ` `` delimiters surrounding
the type. The intent is that we will eventually want to include other
information when formatting a type, like Clang does when printing a
typedef (`'string' (aka 'std::basic_string<char>')`), and such
formatting requires that the diagnostic machinery produces the `` ` ``s
itself.
There are a couple of cases where we really want to format valid Carbon
type syntax directly into a diagnostic, rather than an `aka` or similar,
because the diagnostic text includes part of the type itself, for
example: ``"consider using `partial {0}`"``. For such cases, a `Raw`
form of the diagnostic argument types is added: `TypeIdAsRawType` and
`InstIdAsRawType`. In principle we could instead use ``"consider using
`partial {0:raw}`"``, but our diagnostic machinery isn't set up for
that.
---------
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Introduces the `BindingPattern` and `SymbolicBindingPattern` insts, and
a separate stack of pattern blocks that they are emitted into. The
intent is to generate the corresponding pattern-matching insts (like
`BindName`) from them in a separate pass, but that is deferred to future
PRs.
See
[here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U_vQH17V893J9aF1LJXUnFYBNSs2MjKl4bJPaWCB2zo/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-w0xGYZ0An31Kpz-wvzSXwQ)
for the design this is based on, but note that during review we have
chosen to deviate from that design by putting the patterns in separate
blocks, and omitting the "forward references" from a `BindingPattern` to
its corresponding `BindName`. This in turn necessitates having separate
inst kinds for symbolic and non-symbolic binding patterns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This is resolving a fuzz-discovered crash related to function suspends
and compile time bind indices. Although the crash originally came from
clearly invalid syntax (missing the `=` inside a `class` decl), the
syntax with a value should also be valid but has the same crash.
This approach disallows compile-time bindings in contexts that can
create ambiguous results, particularly class declarations. These are an
issue because a suspended function can have let declarations after it.
I'm allowing them in function bodies and interface scopes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This is a primarily automated change:
- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
- `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
- `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
- ERROR -> error
- WARNING -> warning
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Instead of the `call` instruction having a block with one argument per
explicit argument, preceded optionally by `self` and followed optionally
by a return slot, change the `call` to store only the *runtime*
arguments. Store an index on the runtime parameters to make it easier to
determine the correspondence between arguments and parameters in a call.
Compile-time parameters, whether implicit or explicit, are no longer
included in the call argument list. Instead, they're tracked only in the
`specific_id` on the callee.
For calls to generic classes and generic interfaces, it no longer makes
sense to form a `call` instruction, given that the entirety of the
result is determined by the `specific_id`, which is now formed when
checking the call. Instead, the `call` instruction now only models
function calls, and not calls to other kinds of parameterized entity
names, and we create a `class_type` or `interface_type` instead of a
`call` instruction to model these kinds of calls. Notionally the model
here is that we're following the #3720 approach for calls, but for now
we inline the `Call.Op` function when forming SemIR.
We now also track the enclosing specific for a generic class or generic
interface that appears within an enclosing generic. This is necessary in
order for deduction of the inner generic parameters to not get confused
by the outer generic parameters being absent.
In order to not regress diagnostics, the template argument deduction
mechanism has been extended to specify the name of the parameter we're
deducing against when possible, and call arity mismatch errors are now
diagnosed before performing deduction rather than afterwards.
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This is for consistency with #4120. Similar to that, we can use
overloads on the typed NodeId rather than individually named handlers.
There isn't the same caller benefit here though, since the calls from
check.cpp are already boilerplate.
Build a `Generic` object for generic functions. This object tracks the
generic parameters that are in scope for the generic entity. Eventually
it will track other information about the generic too.
Add basic SemIR formatting support for generic functions.
Most of these are places where we failed to include a header file and
simply never got an error about this. The fix is to include the header
file.
Most other cases are functions that should have been marked `static` but
were not. Finding all of these was a main motivation for me enabling the
warning despite how much work it is.
One complicating factor was that we weren't including the `handle.h` for
all the state-based handler functions. While this isn't a tiny amount of
code, it is just declarations and doesn't add any extra dependencies. It
also lets us have the checking for which functions need to be `static`
and which don't. For the `parse` library I had to add the `handle.h`
header as well, I tried to match the design of it in `check`.
I have also had to work around a bug in the warning, but given the value
it seems to be providing, that seems reasonable. I've filed the bug
upstream: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94138
I also had to use some hacks to work around limitations of Bazel rules
that wrap `cc_library` rules and don't expose `copts`. I filed a bug for
`cc_proto_library` specifically:
~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/22610~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/4446
Following up on discussion from #3948, doing a general rename of
"enclosing scope" to "parent scope" (and "enclosing scopes" to "ancestor
scopes"). The intent is to improve understandability and collide less
with C++ terminology for "enclosing scope". Note this changes most uses
of "enclosing", but leaves behind a few like "enclosing function" and
"enclosing block".
Note this does create some "parent class" mentions for "adapt" and "var"
(the class they're within), which is maybe unfortunate, but we'd
probably say "base class" if we meant inheritance so perhaps that's
okay. Along the same lines, these are the only `parent_class` uses I see
now, and we do have a few `base_class`.
Trying to conform with #4009. Changes SemIR::LocIdAndInst construction
to root out struct init cases with AddInst and related functions. I'm
using templating of AddInst functions in order to avoid `AddInst(loc_id,
InstName{...})` and instead have `AddInst<InstName>(loc_id, {...})` with
I think similar readability results. There are a couple cases where inst
construction is templated and so designated initializers couldn't be
used, so this may be better for those in particular due to the extra
type enforcement.
This probably doesn't clean up every last case, but I was trying to get
the bulk at once without bleeding over into less related changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Use a level comparison during substitution to determine whether we're
substituting a particular binding. Evaluate symbolic bindings with the
same name and the same level to the same symbolic constant, for example
across redeclarations of a generic function.
Geoff Romer
Dana Jansens
Jon Ross-Perkins
Boaz Brickner
Richard Smith
David BlaikieandRichard Smith
josh11bandJosh L
