Add validation that every code block in a function is terminated by a sequence of terminating instructions, and that terminators don't appear anywhere else in code blocks.
This required tracking whether we're in a reachable code block. That's done on the fly when we create a new code block; the new `SemanticsNodeBlockId::Unreachable` is used to represent the case where we're not actually creating a code block because we're in unreachable code.
Add semantic analysis and semantics IR building for `if` expressions, and add the first parts of control flow handling to semantics IR. After discussion with @chandlerc, use [block arguments](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_single-assignment_form#Block_arguments) to convey values from the two arms of the `if` to the result. For now, only a single block argument is supported, but we should revisit this as we explore more of the requirements of the Semantics IR form.
Functions can now contain multiple code blocks, so grab the entry block up-front instead of assuming the entry block will be at the top of the block stack when we reach the end of function emission.
Add trivial support for `bool` type literal, because without it we can't write testcases.
Just opening files in vscode and seeing what clangd flags.
Some edits to ostream.h to stop it from getting flagged (the usage pattern means it's not always obviously used).
This adds tracking of call information plus basic type checking. It adds a builtin for the empty tuple, mainly so that I have the basis for a default function return type.
As an aside, it also unifies printing within SemanticsIR, fixing a missing comma after callables.
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Lazy allocation means that we can use a single node block for _all_ empty node blocks. The change in timing for when the definition node is emitted shouldn't affect semantic correctness; the signature is already present for recursive calls.
This change is to make it clearer what is a TODO versus unexpected behavior. I'm doing this now because I feel it's been getting a little confusing in code.
So for example if I write the code a return type `-> i32`, I get the diagnostic output plus the dump of the (invalid) IR:
```
/carbon-lang/toolchain/semantics/testdata/function/basic.carbon:37:10: Semantics TODO: HandleReturnType
cross_reference_irs_size: 1
callables: [
]
integer_literals: [
]
strings: [
]
nodes: [
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block0, type: node0},
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block1, type: node1},
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block2, type: node0},
{kind: CrossReference, arg0: ir0, arg1: block3, type: node0},
]
node_blocks: [
[
],
]
```
For parameters (and in the future, arguments too; generally comma-separated lists) track two node blocks:
1. param_ir: The complete IR.
2. param_refs: Nodes within the IR that are the "root" parameter.
param_refs should allow quick counting of the # of parameters, and more efficient comparison of call args with function parameters. param_ir should be necessary to generate the actual signature.
In order to construct this, this refactors the node_block_stack into its own class, which is reused in params_stack. These carry references to the underlying SmallVector for lazy modification in order to avoid a dependency cycle with SemanticsIR (also see notes on empty node blocks below).
When finalized, the block pair is pushed onto finished_params_stack. That's because node_stack only has space for one thing, and this is two things -- so I'm essentially choosing a trade-off of adding another stack in order to avoid consuming more space in the expectation that most parse nodes have 0 or 1 things to return, and 2 will be very rare.
As factored, this currently consolidates most empty node blocks into a single canonical empty node block. This is because I think empty blocks, i.e. `()`, will be very common. In order to achieve this, SemanticsNodeBlockStack does lazy creation.
An alternative approach would have been to use 1 node block per parameter. We decided against this in order to reduce the number of vectors being created.
Richard Smith
Jon Ross-Perkins