We frequently want to operate on singletons. Per discussion, drop
`Singleton` to make the code shorter.
This started off as wanting to write `inst_id.is_error()`, but the
dependency relationship between ids.h and singleton_insts.h would
require some kind of delayed evaluation to allow the implementation to
remain in headers (which I suspect is helpful to have for inlining). I
could have added something like `IsErrorInst`, forward declared in ids.h
and defined in singleton_insts.h (which would always be included by
typed_insts.h), but the template approach felt like a decent balance
between (a) removing the boilerplate `::SingletonInstId`, (b)
understandability, (c) still visually mirroring if we immediately return
a singleton, and (d) flexibility for more than just `ErrorInst`. But TBH
I'd probably still have written `is_error()` if it didn't require
addressing the cross-header cycle.
Then I tried `SemIR::InstId::Is<SemIR::ErrorInst>`, which generally
worked with types but generated the complaint that it didn't shorten
*all* singleton uses. So pulling back on `::Is`, and instead just
dropping `Singleton`.
After #5280 there are a few more typed instructions that have an `InstId
type_inst_id` that always holds a type value. These are converted to
`TypeInstId` to encode this fact in the type system. The
`ConvertAggregateElement()` function in convert.cpp is now able to
receive `TypeInstId` for a couple arguments as well.
Additionally, the `type_inst_id` field of `StructTypeField` is made into
a `TypeInstId`.
The `TupleType::elements_id` is renamed to `TupleType::type_elements_id`
to try record the fact that it's an InstBlock of type value
instructions. We don't introduce a TypeInstBlockId at this time, but it
might be nice to make blocks of TypeInstIds in the future.
To assist in working with a block of InstId that are type values, two
additional helpers are added to the TypeStore:
- GetBlockAsTypeInstIds which turns an `ArrayRef<InstId>` into a range
of `TypeInstId`
- GetBlockAsTypeIds which turns an `ArrayRef<InstId>` into a range of
`TypeId`
We use these helpers in places that iterate over the
`TupleType::type_elements_id`.
In preparation for shifting from `TypeId`s potentially representing
attached types to always representing unattached types, using
[terminology suggested on
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/963846118964350976/1359286326779973712).
This change causes us to track slightly more type spelling information
through SemIR.
One change that has significant impact on the SemIR output is that we
now build a `struct_type` instruction in each class representing the
types of the fields, including the spelling used for those types. This
is now no longer always identical to the corresponding canonical
`struct_type` for the object representation, so it's built separately
and owned by the class.
Also remove `TypeBlock` support entirely, as its only use was
representing `TupleType`s, which now use an `InstBlock`.
Each of these types takes another type as an operand. Instead of storing
that other type as a `TypeId`, store it as an `InstId` so that we can
track how it was written, not only its canonical form.
The canonical constant values of these types continue to store the
canonical constant values of their operands, as normal.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
Reduce usage of `GetConstantInSpecific` to a single caller in constant
evaluation, with a TODO to remove that.
This gets us closer to being able to fully perform type-checking against
abstract types instead of types anchored within a particular generic.
Fixes#5186
With @zygoloid's kind assistance, this generalizes the existing
non-const lowering of ClassInit, that had previously only handled
InitializeFrom, to find other cases - such as a nested ClassInit used to
initialize a class member.
This refactors the `FindReturnSlotArgForInitializer` from
`check/convert.cpp` into `sem_ir/file.{h,cpp}` for use from lowering
(since lower doesn't depend on check, which I assume is an intentional
layering constraint - so figured it made sense to move it to sem_ir, and
found one or two similar-ish utility functions in `sem_ir/file.{h,cpp}`,
so figured that was a good spot)
What this does:
- Adds tracking where storage is allocated.
- Determines if that storage supports destruction and, if so, records
the `destroy` function for it.
- Calls any found `destroy` functions when going out-of-scope.
What this does not do:
- Precise scope tracking of temporaries. We currently don't define
temporary scopes, which would probably be the solution.
- Destruction for anything but a `class` with `fn destroy`, in an
implicit return. That excludes:
- Classes with members that need destruction, particularly in the
absence of `fn destroy`.
- Structs, tuples, and arrays.
- Explicit returns, break, continue, nested scopes.
Noting the exclusions in particular, I think those will need work to
support, but this should set the right framework.
The cleanup block concept stems from clang and trying to share code
across cleanups, from discussion with chandlerc. Note in this
implementation I try to find `destroy` functions early on: that's so
that, when destruction is present on multiple paths, particularly
non-shared paths, we only bind the `destroy` method once.
Implementation-wise, I'll note this adds a `has_cleanup` flag to
`TemporaryStorage` and `VarStorage`. There are several related options,
but this felt similar to other information we're trying to track on
instructions. My goal with this is to mitigate the chance of accidental
calls where the storage may not be tracked for destruction. Alternatives
I considered were to not add the flag (I was worried about heightened
risk of errors), or to just add a concept for the relevant `requires`
(which just felt inconsistent).
Cleanup logic ends up in control_flow in this change because I thought
it was a reasonably consistent place for the cleanup block concept and
its pretty direct control flow interactions.
What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.
Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:
- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".
[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).
I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.
- Explicitly document that `*Param` and `*ParamPattern` insts represent
`Call` parameters.
- Stop wrapping compile-time parameter patterns in `ValueParamPattern`
insts (because they aren't `Call` parameters).
- Document how `MatchContext::results_` relates to the `Call`
parameters, and be more consistent about when it's written to.
- Remove `RuntimeParamIndex::Unknown`: we no longer need to distinguish
"this `Param`'s runtime index is unknown" from "this `Param` isn't a
runtime param", because we no longer use `Param`s at all in the latter
case.
- Rename `RuntimeParamIndex` to `CallParamIndex`.
As a side effect of removing the `ValueParamPattern` insts, this fixes a
minor diagnostic bug where `NoteInitializingParam` didn't identify the
specific parameter that led to a deduction failure, because it expects
generic parameters to only be represented by `SymbolicBindingPattern`s,
but before this change they could be wrapped in `ValueParamPattern`s.
Parameter lists need substantially different treatment than tuple
patterns in other contexts, so this change splits them into separate
parse node kinds.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This in particular uses free functions because it's likely to end up
more consistent with types (versus a wrapper object for InstStore).
Note, this is unlikely to have a performance impact, but if it does, we
can look into related approaches (and we've already discussed using
LTO).
Renames `PendingBlock::AddInst` to `PendingBlock::Add` because
`MakeElementAccessInst` expects the matching name to exist.
This creates a new check/type.h for most logic, and also moves some
functions to TypeStore in sem_ir/type.h. My approach for TypeStore is to
focus on moving the read-only functions there.
Note this is building on #4927 which factors out RegionStack, because
this heavily uses the region stack. However, it's a more complex level
of logic that appears specific to pattern handling.
I've moved InsertHere to pattern_match.cpp because it appears to be in
specific use there.
This is a followup from #4834, I searched for "invalid" uses in our
codebase. This is mostly changing comments, and a couple debug
functions, but shouldn't affect testable behavior.
Note a couple things I'll highlight as not changing (but could) are:
- `ReturnTypeInfo::is_valid`
- `"invalid"` uses in the formatter
- `AddInvalid` for `!has_value` in `inst_fingerprinter` (because the
cases it's called sound invalid-ish)
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
This is a precondition for enabling the new pattern-matching subsystem
to support binding patterns that have `if` expressions in the type
position.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Disables three new warnings because they lean more towards style
conflicts than fixes. I've brought these up on #style.
Other than that, mostly fixing basic issues, and things that
clang-tidy-20 seems to fire where clang-tiday-16 didn't. One particular
curious case is `llvm::StringLiteral::data()` uses, which are flagged as
not strictly null-terminated; I'm switching to `const char*` in those
spots which matches `llvm::formatv`'s format argument, but feels worse.
I'm removing `run_clang_tidy.py` here because I'm observing it give
fewer warnings than `bazel build --config=clang-tidy -k
//toolchain/...`. The latter matches how we enforce in GitHub actions
(and also caches results, and suppresses output for files that have no
issues), so I'm dropping the bespoke script.
This introduces `calling_convention_param_ids`, a single block that
consolidates all the information that was being used by consumers of
`param_refs` and `implicit_param_refs`, in a form that's easier to
produce and typically easier to consume.
See also [this Discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1300545448909738125)
regarding the decision to keep the return slot last in the SemIR calling
convention, even though it goes first in the LLVM calling convention.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This is for more clearly distinct names, and to make it a clearer
transition from `BuiltinInst` for name conflicts. `FloatType` is also an
instruction, and we have `Carbon::Error` (common/error.h). This avoids
affecting tests, although the name is embedded in the builtin test.
In `LegacyFloatType`, `Legacy` because I was having trouble coming up
with a more appropriate name. I'm not clear this is a `FloatLiteralType`
at present, it needs some work to mirror `IntLiteralType`.
In `ErrorInst`, the suffix `Inst` was discussed as good and similar to
`BuiltinInst` (although I'm trying to get rid of that).
This is primarily to free up space in the BindingPattern insts, but as a
side effect it moves the link between BindingPattern and its BindName
out of the SemIR, and into a transient data structure in Context.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Adding empty IDs to all block types. This is primarily for
TypeBlockId::Empty, which allows me to disambiguate empty tuple types,
which I think might yield a SemIR readability improvement (PR
forthcoming). I'm splitting PRs so that the limited test impact here is
clear.
- Generate runtime indices as part of pattern matching, rather than as a
separate postprocessing/rewriting step.
- In contexts where runtime parameters aren't permitted, avoid emitting
insts for them to begin with, rather than trying to detect the problem
and rewrite the IR to remove them later on.
Also propagate the pattern IR along with the pattern-match IR, and use
it where appropriate.
Strictly speaking, some parts of the pattern-match IR are allocated
eagerly, while traversing the pattern's parse tree, but they still
aren't actually emitted until we traverse the associated pattern insts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Thomas Köppe
Jon Ross-Perkins
Dana Jansens
Richard Smith
David Blaikie
Geoff RomerandJon Ross-Perkins
josh11bandJosh L