We frequently want to operate on singletons. Per discussion, drop
`Singleton` to make the code shorter.
This started off as wanting to write `inst_id.is_error()`, but the
dependency relationship between ids.h and singleton_insts.h would
require some kind of delayed evaluation to allow the implementation to
remain in headers (which I suspect is helpful to have for inlining). I
could have added something like `IsErrorInst`, forward declared in ids.h
and defined in singleton_insts.h (which would always be included by
typed_insts.h), but the template approach felt like a decent balance
between (a) removing the boilerplate `::SingletonInstId`, (b)
understandability, (c) still visually mirroring if we immediately return
a singleton, and (d) flexibility for more than just `ErrorInst`. But TBH
I'd probably still have written `is_error()` if it didn't require
addressing the cross-header cycle.
Then I tried `SemIR::InstId::Is<SemIR::ErrorInst>`, which generally
worked with types but generated the complaint that it didn't shorten
*all* singleton uses. So pulling back on `::Is`, and instead just
dropping `Singleton`.
Benefits:
* Provide a proper API for accessing lookup information.
* Make assumptions on whether the result is poisoned or not and how we
can use `InstId` explicit.
* Allow safely reusing the `InstId` value for pointing to the poisoning
entity for poisoned results (in a future PR).
* Consolidate `LookupNameInExactScopeResult`, `std::pair<SemIR::InstId,
bool>` and part of `LookupResult`.
Part of #4622.
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
Insert the poison at the same time we do the name lookup to avoid doing
two hash table lookups into each scope. This adds a bit of complication
because import logic now needs to cope with importing a name that is
already poisoned, but the complexity seems worthwhile to reduce the
number of name lookups performed.
This incidentally fixes a bug where we wouldn't poison any name scopes
if we found the name in an enclosing lexical scope, leading to one extra
diagnostic in existing tests.
Part of #4622
Change the implementation to use an explicit `is_poisoned` bit instead
of `InstId::PoisonedName` value.
Zero behavior change.
This would allow to more easily change the API to support accessing the
poisoning declaration so we can have better name poisoning diagnosis.
#4622
This is a preparation change for adding name poisoning support
(https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/issues/4622), which is
expected to require more elaborate logic around NameScope since a name
can be not defined yet, defined, or poisoned.
The API separates looking up a name from getting the full entry since we
have cases where the entries are invalidated between the time we're
looking for the name and when we access (and sometimes modify) the
entry.
This change has the following benefits:
* `names` and `name_map` are internal to `NameScope` and are guaranteed
to match.
* `extended_scopes` and `import_ir_scopes` can not be manipulated (only
new scopes can be added).
* `inst_id`, `name_id` and `parent_scope_id` are constants.
* `has_error` can only be mutated from false to true.
---------
Co-authored-by: jonmeow <jperkins@google.com>
Jon Ross-Perkins
Boaz Brickner
Richard Smith
