Modifiers came to mind since we had a bit of discussion way back when,
about whether parse or check was the best place to do validation. Trying
to capture the tradeoffs to consider here.
Note, I'm writing this up mainly because I was asked why I don't reject
`fn destroy;` in parse twice (but still allowing things like `fn
destroy();` or `fn destroy[]();`), so I've been thinking a reference of
the higher-level parsing philosophy would be helpful.
Split StructComma into StructLiteralComma and StructTypeLiteralComma in
order to easily differentiate handling (remains the same in this PR).
Add "Literal" to StructField and StructTypeField because it feels
inconsistent versus the other non-shared things. StructFieldDesignator
remains shared between value literals and type literals.
Note I probably would've made StructFieldDesignator non-shared too, but
that'd require either a lookahead of 2 (to see the separator`) or a
writeback after parsing the separator, neither of which felt especially
crucial for this, when what I'm really trying to do is split type
literal handling a little further.
This is a primarily automated change:
- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
- `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
- `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
- ERROR -> error
- WARNING -> warning
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Geoff Romer
Jon Ross-Perkins
Richard Smith