This is stamping out the per-instruction structs, similar to what we do
elsewhere. `BuiltinInstKind::label` then finishes shifting to
`InstKind::ir_name`.
Adds per-builtin instructions, removing `BuiltinInst`. This collapses
`builtin_inst_kind.def` into `inst_kind.def` so that we have a single
place for all macro uses. I still want to remove `BuiltinInstKind`, but
it's something I think is better separated from the `BuiltinInst`
removal.
I'm collapsing the build targets `ids` and `inst_kind` into one because
they both have links to builtin kind information now. It's hard to
separate without a cycle. I'm using the `typed_insts` name because that
seems like the actual most significant thing there, and more interesting
relative to the `inst` target.
I'm trying to increase the distinction between BuiltinKind and
BuiltinFunctionKind. BuiltinKind is for instructions,
BuiltinFunctionKind is for function definitions. To get to this point,
I'm doing a few changes:
- BuiltinKind -> BuiltinInstKind
- builtin_kind.* -> builtin_inst_kind.*: filename consistency
- Builtin -> BuiltinInst: mainly for consistency with the above
- Builtin::builtin_kind -> BuiltinInst::builtin_inst_kind: somewhat
repetitive but seems like a consistent edit
- Function::builtin_kind -> Function::builtin_function_kind: seems a
useful distinction
I'm leaving alone things like (and mentioning in case there's a desire
for more renames):
- InstId::BuiltinError, InstId::ForBuiltin: these I think are more
apparent because they're directly associated with Inst.
- GetBuiltinICmpPredicate in lowering: maybe builtin function handling
should be in its own file, but these local names don't feel problematic
to me.
- GetBuiltinType, BuildBuiltinValueRepr, PerformBuiltinIntComparison:
similar to the above, names don't feel too problematic
Jon Ross-Perkins