Also declare them `inline` since we're putting the `always_inline`
attribute on them. Use the `internal_linkage` attribute rather than
`SC_Static` since it's a more precise mechanism and matches what we do
for static member functions in reverse interop (where `SC_Static` means
something else and would not give the function internal linkage).
Roll LLVM to `6811a83c81500ee373adfc0d9978ff9625a4cf1c`.
This includes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183831 which
moved the functionality of `finish()` on `DiagnosticConsumer`s into the
destructors, and removed the `finish()` method. So, our callers to
`finish()` are migrated to cause the destructor to run at that time
instead.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Some module metadata changed - because rather than linking one module
with one module metadata value (eg: PIC Level 0, or unspecified) and one
module with a different one (PIC level 2, in clang) - we use Clang's
Module as-is, no merging required, so Clang's module metadata sticks
rather than being merged with default values from Carbon.
Also tweaked the name we use for Clang's module name so it matches the
carbon file name.
Otherwise the IR changes seem to be just reorderings - C++ interop goes
first, then Carbon, rather than the other way around.
Background:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wi85FRiWh4X9A-gCYMVGKR40-q5fM6-3JaSpePk-XCY/edit?usp=sharing
And specifically this work is essentially an alternative to #5543
Clang's code generation is implemented through an ASTListener
(clang::CodeGenerator) that is attached throughout Clang's
parsing/sema/code
generation phases and acts on Clang AST incrementally throughout that
process.
Prior to this patch, Carbon has only created the CodeGenerator during
Carbon's
`lower` phase, missing out on key callbacks that would be made by Clang
during
`check`. Some of these issues were addressed by #6237 and #6483 - but
there were
still remaining cases where the delayed processing lead to missing
functionality.
With #6483 much of the Clang code that made multithreaded complexity of
#5543 is
no longer present, and we have access to the point of ASTListener
registration
so we can register the CodeGenerator there and consume its resulting
llvm::Module during lower.
Examples of some of the bugs this addresses are seen in the linked doc,
and
checked in as tests in this change in
`clang_code_generator_callbacks.carbon`
An indicental bug that's also fixed, and caused all the other test case
churn,
is that the `CodeGenerator` created during `lower` wasn't getting passed
the
Clang `CodeGenOpts` and was creating its own default - so, most notably,
optimization flags were not respected. This meant that the LLVM IR from
Clang
was always -O0 style IR (optnone, no inlinehint, no TBAA, etc). With
this
change, now the Clang IRGen gets the real `CodeGenOpts` and respects
optimization/other flags specified there.
This is only meant to be a rough proof of concept - I'm totally open to
reworking this in any way (even quite substantially) if folks have ideas
about
how this should be implemented most generally/elegantly/etc.
This avoids us trying to produce a reference to the C++ destructor,
which Clang won't emit because it believes it's unnecessary. This
previously led to link errors.
Fixe #6502.
This updates lower/testdata to use _ instead of proper names, in order
to avoid the "unused binding" warnings from #2022 which are being
implemented. These changes do not depend on the implementation which
should make everything easier to review.
See #6460 with part 1 of the implementation. It was split upon request
in order to make reviewing easier, the original state of the PR was
updating hundreds of test cases.
The PR has thus been split, part 2 including test cases changes can be
viewed at
https://github.com/burakemir/carbon-lang/tree/unused_pattern_bindings_p2022_impl_part2
... many tests need to be updated, so it seems best to get those tests
out of the way that are not interesting.
These are not all tests in lower/testdata - a few of them are
interesting in the sense that they cannot use '_' because it leads to
failed redeclaration check. This is exactly the scenario described in
#3763 which requires the 'unused' marker. Those are left untouched here
but are updated in
https://github.com/burakemir/carbon-lang/tree/unused_pattern_bindings_p2022_impl_part2
This adds just enough debug info for i32/int parameters and return
values, with a path forward for adding DWARF type metadata for other
types.
As it happens, return type information is carried separately from
parameter information:
* Return type information is carried in the `type` of the `DISubprogram`
(as a `DISubroutineType` - which does carry parameter type information
as well, but that's unused when the DWARF is emitted by LLVM)
* Parameter information is carried by `DILocalVariable`s with a non-zero
`arg` value (representing the order of function parameters)
In the absence of locations for the parameters (future work), nothing
would usually keep the `DILocalVariable` live/reachable when emitting
DWARF - so for cases where this can happen (for clang, this happens in
optimized builds where all references to the parameter variable might be
optimized away) the variables can be "retained" in a list on the
`DISubprogram` - achieved by passing `AlwaysPreserve` parameter to
`createParameterVariable` (adds them to a list, then that list gets
attached to the `DISubprogram` when it's finalized later)
For now, any unsupported types are emitted as `void*` (except void
return, which is implemented as void) as a placeholder.
Given this example:
```
import Core library "io";
class MyClass {
}
fn Unsupported(v: MyClass) {
}
fn Ret() -> i32 {
return 42;
}
fn Arg(x: i32) {
Core.Print(x);
}
fn Run() {
}
```
this is the resulting DWARF:
```
DW_TAG_compile_unit
DW_AT_name ("test.carbon")
DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_name ("Unsupported")
DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_type (0x00000066 "void *")
DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_name ("Ret")
DW_AT_type (0x00000062 "int")
DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_name ("Arg")
DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_type (0x00000062 "int")
DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_name ("Run")
DW_TAG_base_type
DW_AT_name ("int")
DW_TAG_pointer_type
```
And the debugger:
```
(gdb) p Ret()
$1 = 42
(gdb) p Arg(4)
4
$2 = void
```
I'm not sure if there's a way this logic should be merged with the logic
for making the `llvm::Function` type (which the `DISubroutineType`
building code was inspired by/copied from) - since they're done at
different times/places, I don't think there's an easy way to do it in
one pass, but maybe the code can be shared (even if it's run twice) in
some generic `SemIR::Function` type walker.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
For now, treat such classes as being final, since we can't correctly
derive from them.
This removes the last category of C++ class that we are entirely unable
to interop with, and is a prerequisite for interop with C++ iostreams
(which have a virtual base class).
Richard Smith
Jon Ross-Perkins
Dana JansensandChandler Carruth
David Blaikie
Burak Emir