As part of this, move functions that seem reasonable to make out-of-line
to a separate `_impl.h` header file that is only included where the
explicit instantiation _definition_ is provided.
By using explicit instantiation we can make these templates behave more
like non-template classes in terms of supporting out-of-line definitions
that don't need to be compiled by every translation unit. The set of
eventual instantiations here is fundamentally known, and there tend to
be headers that define a canonical "leaf" type where it makes sense to
trigger the explicit instantiation.
Where we already had a `.cpp` file to put the explicit instantiation
definition, use it. But in some places we didn't have such a `.cpp` file
so this PR adds those.
This also requires that we have precise constraints on APIs that _can't_
be instantiated for specific argument types, as now we don't do this
lazily.
Combined, this appears to reduce the sum of object file sizes in the
`check` directory by almost 40% (122mb -> 74mb) in my measurement.
My actual goal was to improve compile times, but so far I don't have a
great methodology for measuring these... But the object file size
reduction seems to confirm this is a net win and likely represents a
non-trivial improvement in compile time.
Assisted-by: Antigravity with Gemini
Found by inspection; I haven't found a way to cause this to manifest,
and I'm not sure it's possible. Refactor slightly to make it harder for
this bug to recur.
Also make a CHECK a bit more informative. (Unrelated, but I was
investigating a failure of that CHECK when I found this.)
The IdTag knows the type of the Id its tagging and the type of the Id
being used as the tag. This prevents mixing up tagged and untagged ids,
and avoids having to work with untyped integers.
Adds an Untagged marker struct that's used as the tag type in IdTag when
no tag is desired.
The complexity of ConstantIds and TypeIds became a bit visible: TypeIds
are concrete ConstantIds. And ConstantIds have two different tagging
schemes, one for concrete and one for symbolic ids. And ConstantIds are
actually re-cast InstIds with the same index. The LoweredTypeStore needs
to work with tagged TypeIds, but the tags actually come from an InstId
store in ConstantValueStore. Now this is expressed in the type system by
getting the tags for TypeIds from the ConstantValueStore.
ValueStores without an TagId type parameter are now visibly untagged.
IdTag is now only default constructible when it does not have a tag,
which means ValueStore is only default constructible when the TagId is
untagged. This forces tagged value stores to be constructed correctly
with a tag at compile time, and untagged ones to be constructed without.
FixedSizeValueStore has overloads for dealing with tagged and untagged
Ids, since it can't default-construct ValueStore for tagged ids, and no
longer requires passing in default-constructed tags when there is no tag
in the ids.
This is reducing ValueStore inference of types from `using`, and removes
`using ValueType = ...` from affected id types.
I'm adding a number of `using FooStore = ValueStore<FooId, Foo>` because
I think it's a little repetitive otherwise; often 4 cases where I'm
doing this: getter, const getter, member, and getter on `Context`. Note
we also have a number of `-> decltype(auto)` that were added I think
mainly to avoid repeating the type, but I'm not sure whether there'll be
agreement on replacing those and so am not changing them here.
I'm placing these aliases with the value type in general, because I
think it's probably easier to view that way. An alternative would be to
put all the types on `File`, but:
- That would be inconsistent with things like `InstStore`, which are
very `ValueStore`-adjacent and put with their value type.
- `File` would have a _lot_ of using's, and the accessors are already
noisy -- I think it would just make the file harder to skim.
Note this is the heart of what I'd brought up [on
Discord](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1388199282250613019).
This PR still leaves CanonicalValueStore and BlockValueStore as things
to also add parameters to, but I thought it best to try breaking the set
of changes apart by type. Both of those rely on ValueStore, so
ValueStore needs to change first.
When lowering a specific function whose generic was defined in a
different file, switch to that other file's `FileContext` and lower the
generic there. Also pass the `FileContext` corresponding to the specific
into the `FunctionContext`, and use that `FileContext` for resolving
requests for constants and types from the specific.
This avoids reallocating the backing buffer in ValueStore so that
references into the ValueStore are never invalidated when adding new
values. This works especially well since we never delete values from a
ValueStore.
The strategy used is to allocate chunks of a fixed size, and inserting
into each chunk until it is full before allocating the next. The
ValueStore starts with an initial allocated chunk in all cases, so that
there is only a single indirection for adding and accessing values from
this chunk. After it's full, additional chunks are allocated in a
vector, so two indirections are required to add or access values in
these chunks.
This obviates the need for
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/5529 as we no longer
need to worry about holding pointers into a ValueStore.
We introduce a Flatten operation for ranges. It flattens a "range over
ranges over Ts" down to a "range over Ts". This allows us to make an
range over the values in the ValueStore from a range over the chunks in
the ValueStore. See
https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html#method.flatten
for inspiration for this name choice. Flatten is used in one other case
where we were writing two levels of for loops to do the same thing.
The `array_ref()` accessor is changed to `values()` and its now a range
(typed as a `ValueStoreRange`) over all values as references (like
ArrayRef was, but without random access).
As pointers to a ValueStore can no longer be invalidated, we remove the
ASAN poisoning feature and support from ValueStore.
This may cause a regression in our compile benchmark of up to 5%, though
that is close to or within the noise of the benchmark. We can look at
ways to optimize things further in the future. Perhaps by tuning the
chunk size further, or by making later chunks larger than earlier
chunks, or other strategies.
Instead of building an eval block as a separate pass at the end of a
generic, build the eval block incrementally.
The larger change here is that asking for the type or constant value of
an instruction now always returns an unattached type or constant value,
in order to preserve the behavior that we previously achieved by doing
the rewrite to attached types and constant values at the end of handling
the generic.
This also incidentally fixes some subtle issues where attached types and
constant values would leak out into check and cause it to get confused
about differences between attached and unattached values. Check should
no longer see attached values except where it explicitly asks for them.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
Reduce usage of `GetConstantInSpecific` to a single caller in constant
evaluation, with a TODO to remove that.
This gets us closer to being able to fully perform type-checking against
abstract types instead of types anchored within a particular generic.
Add a full entity representation for associated constants, and build a
`Generic` object for them. This `Generic` is parameterized by the
enclosing `Self` type, allowing the use of `Self` within the type of the
associated constant to be supported.
When performing impl lookup for an associated constant, produce the type
with the provided self type substituted for its `Self` along with any
generic parameters of the interface.
Split the handling of associated constant declarations into two parts,
corresponding to the code before the `=`, and the code between the `=`
and `;` (if any). The former goes into the generic declaration region;
the latter into the generic definition region. This prepares us to
handle the default value for an associated constant, but for now we're
just storing the information and not actually using it.
Remove the entity type field from `assoc_entity_type`, because it's
almost unused and is an attractive nuisance -- it must necessarily be a
type in the generic scope of the associated constant rather than in the
scope of the instruction (because there is no `Self` anywhere else),
which means that it's hard to substitute into or derive meaning from.
See `toolchain/check/testdata/impl/assoc_const_self.carbon` for tests of
the new functionality; these used to cause the toolchain to crash.
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
Previously Collect() was used for types that implemented
CollectMemUsage() but otherwise Add() was used. This required the caller
to think about the type of the field and know/decide which method to
use.
Now, the caller always uses Collect() unless they are adding specific
byte values, in which case Add is used. Typically then, Add will only be
used to implement the CollectMemUsage() function.
To do this we require all Collect() methods to be templates so that they
all be a single overload set. The Collect on BumpPtrAllocator is
converted to a template that checks
`std::same_as<llvm::BumpPtrAllocator, T>`.
Add support for initializing types like `GenericClass(i32)` from a
struct literal. A new kind of instruction, `complete_type_witness`, is
added to the class definition to track the object representation type so
that it's visible to the generics machinery. Accesses to the object
representation of a class have all been updated to pass in the class's
`SpecificId` so that the types of the fields of the specific class are
used instead of the types of the fields of the generic class in places
that look at the object representation -- primarily class
initialization.
This switches `DCHECK` and `FATAL` as well.
The goal is to reduce the code size impact of these assertions so that
we can keep more of them enabled. Currently, the largest cost I see from
`CHECK` is not the actual check or the cold code itself, but actually
the failure to inline trivial functions due to the presence of the cold
code. This means that our goal isn't to reduce apparent code size in the
final binary but the LLVM IR cost assessed for these routines in the
inliner, which closely correlates with code size but is a bit different.
As discussed in #4283, experimentation shows that a single function call
with a minimal number of arguments is the lowest cost model for these.
This is easily achieved with a format-string API that internally uses
`llvm::formatv`. This PR is essentially the `CHECK` version of #4283.
However, the check macros are substantially harder to make work with
both format strings and streaming because they also take a condition.
Also, unexpectedly, I was very successful at devising a regular
expression based automated rewrite from the streaming to the format
string form with only low 10s of manual fixes. This includes compacting
strings broken up across lines, etc. Given how well that went, I've
prepared this PR which just directly switches to the format string API
and migrate everything to use it.
One nice side-effect is that the format string approach ends up greatly
simplifying the implementation here as well.
This is ... *shockingly* effective. Parsing speeds up by more than 3%
with just this change. And checking speeds up by **8%** with this change
alone:
```
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/256 86.3µs ± 1% 82.9µs ± 1% -3.94% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/1024 431µs ± 1% 415µs ± 1% -3.76% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/4096 1.77ms ± 1% 1.71ms ± 1% -3.18% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/16384 7.44ms ± 1% 7.17ms ± 2% -3.56% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/65536 30.7ms ± 1% 29.7ms ± 1% -3.15% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Parse>/262144 131ms ± 1% 127ms ± 1% -2.81% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/256 878µs ± 2% 800µs ± 1% -8.91% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/1024 1.88ms ± 2% 1.72ms ± 1% -8.56% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/4096 5.78ms ± 2% 5.28ms ± 1% -8.70% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/16384 21.9ms ± 1% 20.1ms ± 1% -8.02% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/65536 90.4ms ± 2% 83.1ms ± 1% -8.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
BM_CompileAPIFileDenseDecls<Phase::Check>/262144 381ms ± 2% 352ms ± 1% -7.79% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This avoids import cycles, and reduces the number of temporary vectors
we build (and potentially throw away on retry). Import the self specific
when importing a generic, now that there's no risk that will introduce
cycles.
Note that we could take the same approach to import classes, interfaces,
and so on, instead of the current third phase of resolution for those
instructions, but in this PR I'm just addressing the import cycle I'm
currently seeing in a work-in-progress PR.
Import generics and specifics when they are referenced by imported
entities.
When importing a generic, we import the symbolic constants required by
its eval block, and then rebuild the eval block itself given the list of
constants it needs to compute. This is likely a bit less efficient than
directly importing the contents of the eval block, but avoids needing to
either extend the importer code to be able to import the instructions
that can appear in the eval block or extend the evaluator to cope with
instructions from a different `SemIR::File`.
Importing a symbolic constant is unaffected, and does not yet preserve
the associated generic and index within that generic, so uses of a
generic from an imported IR still don't pick up values from the
specific, but the improved functionality can be seen in the changes to
the SemIR in the testcases.
As discussed in toolchain meeting, we want to avoid overloading the
meaning of "instance", and "specific" was the best name we found. It's a
little unorthodox and inventive, but hopefully over time will become as
unsurprising as the term "generic" is.
We can't use the instruction from the generic directly, because it
doesn't have the right constant value. Instead add an instruction that
models the transition from the constant value in the generic to the
constant value in the generic instance.
Also start associating the self generic instance with unqualified
lookups that find results in an enclosing generic, so that we track the
information necessary to create the new instruction.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This injects a customization point for hashtable-specific equality
testing that the key context uses by default. While this is rarely
needed, there are LLVM types where it is necessary and it seems a good
general tool to have to avoid unnecessary complexity from custom key
contexts when a simple customization of equality is all that is
required.
This also adds a CRTP mixin for implementing a common pattern of key
contexts where the context provides translation of some key types into
another type, potentially using state. Rather than having to implement
the entire key context API, code can derive from this template and
simply provide a set of overloads for the types it wants to translate.
Any key types used which can be passed to one of those overloads will
get translated before following the same logic as the default key
context. While this updates the only usage so far of this pattern, a
subsequent PR will add several more users making the pattern worth
abstracting here.
Also add a corresponding value store and YAML output.
We don't create any generic instances in this change; this is just
adding infrastructure for future changes.
Chandler Carruth
Richard Smith
Dana Jansens
Jon Ross-Perkins
Dana Jansens
