Move logic to merge class and function definitions onto Class and
Function, matching how we handle merging for EntityWithParamsBase.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
Move call_params_id from EntityBaseWithParams to FunctionFields.
No visible difference for Function. Since field call_params_id is
function specific fits better in FunctionFields.
Add a full entity representation for associated constants, and build a
`Generic` object for them. This `Generic` is parameterized by the
enclosing `Self` type, allowing the use of `Self` within the type of the
associated constant to be supported.
When performing impl lookup for an associated constant, produce the type
with the provided self type substituted for its `Self` along with any
generic parameters of the interface.
Split the handling of associated constant declarations into two parts,
corresponding to the code before the `=`, and the code between the `=`
and `;` (if any). The former goes into the generic declaration region;
the latter into the generic definition region. This prepares us to
handle the default value for an associated constant, but for now we're
just storing the information and not actually using it.
Remove the entity type field from `assoc_entity_type`, because it's
almost unused and is an attractive nuisance -- it must necessarily be a
type in the generic scope of the associated constant rather than in the
scope of the instruction (because there is no `Self` anywhere else),
which means that it's hard to substitute into or derive meaning from.
See `toolchain/check/testdata/impl/assoc_const_self.carbon` for tests of
the new functionality; these used to cause the toolchain to crash.
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
Note that I left some calls to `is_defined()` where I thought they were
interchangeable.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
This introduces `calling_convention_param_ids`, a single block that
consolidates all the information that was being used by consumers of
`param_refs` and `implicit_param_refs`, in a form that's easier to
produce and typically easier to consume.
See also [this Discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1300545448909738125)
regarding the decision to keep the return slot last in the SemIR calling
convention, even though it goes first in the LLVM calling convention.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This is at a point where it's getting difficult to read, and #4479 is
adding a large block comment. In order to more clearly delineate
members, add blank lines between.
Also propagate the pattern IR along with the pattern-match IR, and use
it where appropriate.
Strictly speaking, some parts of the pattern-match IR are allocated
eagerly, while traversing the pattern's parse tree, but they still
aren't actually emitted until we traverse the associated pattern insts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Introduces the `BindingPattern` and `SymbolicBindingPattern` insts, and
a separate stack of pattern blocks that they are emitted into. The
intent is to generate the corresponding pattern-matching insts (like
`BindName`) from them in a separate pass, but that is deferred to future
PRs.
See
[here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U_vQH17V893J9aF1LJXUnFYBNSs2MjKl4bJPaWCB2zo/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-w0xGYZ0An31Kpz-wvzSXwQ)
for the design this is based on, but note that during review we have
chosen to deviate from that design by putting the patterns in separate
blocks, and omitting the "forward references" from a `BindingPattern` to
its corresponding `BindName`. This in turn necessitates having separate
inst kinds for symbolic and non-symbolic binding patterns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Support for types (particularly classes) is left as a TODO.
There's also an issue I'm observing with a "define in impl" test, but
this is probably an issue with resolving the prior declaration which is
imported indirectly. The PR was already feeling big, so I'm choosing to
cut here.
Note, this does not implement the rule "The owning library's API file
must import the `extern` declaration, and must also contain a
declaration."
This adds fields to `EntityWithParamsBase` to reflect the intention with
`extern library` design. I'm renaming `decl_id` because it shouldn't be
expected to be assigned anymore. import_ref.cpp I'm deliberately keeping
on `first_owning_decl_id` (which will break when importing `extern
library` declarations). Most other cases are for diagnostics, and I'm
using `latest_decl_id` to try and get the closest declaration to the
error. Note I'm partly splitting out this PR to show the test effect,
which apparently we don't test related cases.
It's actually possible to get into all four combinations of having
parameter lists versus being generic:
- An entity nested within a generic, such as a member class, can be
generic even if it has no parameters.
- As a corner case, an entity with an *empty* parameter list has
parameter lists, but isn't a generic because it doesn't have any generic
parameters.
I'd considered moving DeclParams uses over, but when handling qualified
names, there's a parse node instead of an instruction. I did try to
unify a couple other uses though, including adding MergeDefinition. I
expect `interface` will use a little more once it's more completely
implemented, but maybe I'm wrong about that.
Richard Smith
Jon Ross-PerkinsandRichard Smith
Alina Sbirlea
Geoff RomerandRichard Smith
josh11bandJosh L