Class vars are still restricted to simple `name: type` bindings, not
full patterns. This is now handled in the check phase instead of during
parsing.
This is in preparation for supporting `static var`.
For #6830, add support for inline C++ fragments as a declaration rather
than as a packaging directive. For now, this uses `inline Cpp
<string-literal>;` as syntax. The prior `import Cpp inline
<string-literal>;` is left alone for the time being. We can decide
separately whether to remove that.
`inline Cpp` requires that there was at least one `import Cpp`. It's not
clear to me if that's the right design long-term, but it seems
reasonable for now.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Google Antigravity
When parsing a pattern, if we encounter something that isn't pattern
syntax, try parsing as an expression instead. We only need one-token
lookahead to distinguish pattern syntax from expression syntax.
Track a precedence group through pattern parsing so that we can allow
different kinds of expressions in a top-level pattern (such as the
operand of `let`) and in a nested pattern (such as a subpattern of a
tuple pattern or within grouping parens). For example, we do not allow
`case if ...`, and for now I've chosen to also not allow logical or
relational operators at the top level of a pattern, so `case 1 + 1` is
OK, but `case 1 == 1` and `case true and false` require parentheses.
This decision should be ratified or revisited by a design proposal.
Very basic check support is also provided, only sufficient to form an
`ExprPattern` instruction and nothing beyond that. For now, all pattern
matching against an `ExprPattern` fails with a TODO error. To support
that, I've switched from calling `BeginSubpattern` in the parent handler
of a pattern and `EndSubpatternAs*` in the pattern handler itself to
calling both functions in parent handlers, with `EndSubpattern`
converting an expression into an expression pattern where needed.
Depends on #6976.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Google Antigravity
Do not treat it as a 1-tuple pattern as we used to. The design indicates
that `(pattern)` is invalid, but this appears to be an oversight, and
grouping parens appear to be the intended interpretation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Use the same node kind for the body of `case` and `default` handlers. We
don't need to distinguish these in check, so don't create extra node
kinds for them.
In order to make the nodes properly delimited, make the label (`case
...` or `default`) nodes be children of the `=>` node rather than
siblings. This allows us to use the node kind of the `=>` as the
bracketing node for the complete handler, rather than having two
different bracketing node kinds, one for each kind of label.
This adds the necessary parser infrastructure to recognize and parse
lambda expressions in Carbon.
Key changes:
- Added and Parse Node Kinds.
- Updated to use to accommodate the growing number of node kinds.
- Implemented parser states and handlers for lambda syntax ( or ).
- Added structure to .
- Added diagnostics for missing lambda bodies.
- Added a stub in phase to defer semantic analysis using .
- Added parser tests for lambdas.
Every test that used `addr` before #6283 should be using `ref` after
this PR. In most cases that was done in #6283, but this PR transitions a
few that I missed in that first pass. In addition, #6283 cloned the old
`addr` tests from `foo.carbon` to `foo_addr.carbon` in order to maintain
test coverage during the transition; this PR removes those cloned tests.
This proposal renames the syntax used to mark an overriding definition
of a virtual method from `impl fn` to `override fn` to avoid ambiguity:
besides indicating an overriding virtual function, it can be parsed as
an "impl" declaration when the construct following "impl" begins with a
lambda introduced by "fn".
Closes#5711
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Decouples associated constants from being special cased in let handlers.
Enforces associated constant grammar restrictions in parsing instead of
checking.
Closes#5411
Also renames variables of that type to match. A follow-up PR will rename
`Parse::StateStackEntry` to `Parse::State`. This is more consistent with
the naming of similar enums elsewhere in the toolchain, and with the
prevailing practice of using `state` rather than e.g. `entry` as the
name of a `StateStackEntry`.
See also discussion
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/963846118964350976/1326280585592700990)
In line with the proposal in #4682, this changes the array syntax to be
array(T, N). `array` is a builtin keyword which must be followed by
parens containing two expressions and a separating comma.
The array type expression is still fully builtin, it does not forward to
a Core.Array library type yet. It merely adds the `ArrayType`
instruction, as was done with the previous syntax.
Followup work will change the instruction to reference to Core.Array,
once the library type exists and can be used directly.
---------
Co-authored-by: zygoloid <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Parameter lists need substantially different treatment than tuple
patterns in other contexts, so this change splits them into separate
parse node kinds.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
This adds support for choice types at a similar level to that of a C
enum, where each alternative has a name but no additional
data/parameters attached to it. We generate a TODO diagnostic if
parameters are specified.
Because there's no extra data, the storage is a simple unsigned integer
discriminant of the smallest possible size.
A choice without any alternatives is not constructible. A choice with a
single alternative is, and has an empty tuple in place of a discriminant
since it has only one state. The empty tuple is used to make the class
non-constructible. This can be improved.
Each alternative is turned into a let binding on the choice that is a
value of the choice with that alternative set as the active one in the
discriminant. This isn't possible to write in user code with a class
right now, since the let binding has the same type as the choice
(which is a class) it is within. It's possible to generate it in semir
however by adding the binding after the class is marked complete.
When I open a .def file, there are often 4 errors:
- The #error
- The #define is not defined
- Missing `;`
- Identifier naming
This PR is meant to disable all of these, since they can be distracting
from fixable diagnostics.
Change parse tree from `template (T:! type)` to `(template T):! type`,
so that we have information about whether a binding is a template
binding available when forming the representation of the binding
pattern. This incidentally fixes a bug that we would accept `template
addr A:! B` instead of the intended `addr template A:! B`.
Track whether a symbolic binding is a template binding on the
`EntityName` object. I'm borrowing a bit from the `CompileTimeBindIndex`
for this in order to avoid making `EntityName`s larger. Longer-term, we
should think about using a different representation for symbolic
bindings, to avoid including these fields in all `EntityName`s, but
that's out of scope for this change.
So far, template bindings are treated as having the same phase as
checked bindings, but that will change in a future PR.
These don't fully work in check and beyond yet, because they're not
added into lexical lookup, but already mostly do the right thing.
Per #3407, disallow namespace declarations anywhere other than at file
scope for now.
We don't treat statements starting with a packaging introducer keyword
(`package`, `library`, `import`) as declarations because they're
sufficiently unlikely to occur that the error recovery doesn't seem
important, and this avoids needing to disambiguate `package.` at the
start of an expression.
Includes support for the `impls`, `=`, and `==` requirement operators to
the right of a `where`, but `and` to allow multiple requirements is
still a TODO.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh L <josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Parse the name of a declaration as a sequence of `NameQualifier`s --
which have a name, possibly parameters, and a trailing period --
followed by a name and possibly parameters. This prepares us for parsing
declarations of members of generic classes and similar cases, but
actually supporting such member redeclarations is left to a future
change.
We previously required functions to have parameters, but no longer do,
following the direction of #3848. Cases like namespaces that can't
actually have parameters are now diagnosed in check instead of in parse.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Change syntax for package declaration to put the `impl` keyword at the
start and remove the `api` keyword.
To support this, rearrange processing of package, library, and import
declarations to use the general modifier handling support in declaration
parsing rather than special-case logic.
There is an ambiguity in `impl package.Foo as Bar`, which we resolve by
treating `package` as an introducer after a modifier only if it's not
followed by `.`.
This provides `export import` logic in lex, parse, and check; `export
name` logic is only in lex and parse, not check.
I think with `export name` I'm going to need to modify import_ref and
some consolidation logic, whereas `export import` seems feasible to keep
as primarily import logic. Given the implementations were looking like
they'd diverge more substantially, I thought it'd be helpful to cut the
PR here.
Noticed an unexpected format change in #3850, it's probably because
pre-commit needs to explicitly include def files. The def change here is
a consequence of `pre-commit run -a` with this change.
On the parsing side, we treat `a.(b)` as a member access whose second
operand is a `ParenExpr` rather than a `MemberName`. A new node category
is added for the union of `MemberName` and `ParenExpr` to support this.
Checking is mostly reusing the same pieces we already have for simple
member access. Compound member access is in most ways a simplified form
of simple member access because it doesn't need to do any lookup.
This undoes parts of #3515 in order to allow PushGlobalInit to be called
when the initializer is called, instead of at the end of the binding
pattern. The current approach is fragile because supported patterns will
become more complex. We also will likely want similar support in `let`,
which puts the initializer first, so this offers a consistent approach
for both.
[Looking
back](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1184237511766179840),
this is more or less the second option in that message, but using the
PeekNextIs to avoid vagueness about what's being popped first.
Note I'm putting in PeekNextIs for what I'm hoping will be a pretty
narrow use-case. I could've added depth arguments to the Peek functions,
but that would've rippled through a number of APIs and it's not clear to
me that this has generic utility. I mean, right now it could just be
PeekNextIsVariableInitializer, since it's only optional in that case.
Adds `BindAlias` with a hybrid of `BindName` and `NameRef` semantics. I
think it's slightly closer to `BindName` because it introduces a name,
so I'm going more in that direction. This also matches the need for
`bind_name_id` with imports on enclosing scopes.
Note, only things that look like a name reference are being allowed on
the RHS of `alias`. This includes builtins that look like name
references, such as `bool`, but not ones that turn into values
underneath, such as `false`.
Also stop supporting `var` with initializer inside `for`.
Resolves TODO in `handle_variable.cpp`
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Nicholas Bishop
Richard Smith
Özgür
Burak Emir
Elliott KaltandRichard Smith
josh11bandJosh L
czapiga
kshokhin