Mainly because "sorting_diagnostic_consumer" is legacy, since
`SortingDiagnosticConsumer` became `SortingConsumer`. Also better
reflecting contents of these files.
Where I'm not renaming, I'm less positive about dropping "diagnostics"
from "file_diagnostics" and "null_diagnostics" (which contain both a
consumer and emitter, and "null.h" seems like poor naming), so not doing
that here. Also "diagnostic.h" contains `struct Diagnostic`, so is a
decent fit.
Assisted-by: Google Antigravity with Gemini 3 Flash
By moving dumping, we can have dumping occur before verification that
might CHECK-fail (e.g. parse tree and llvm IR verification).
I'm dropping vlogging of raw semir. It was only done when dumping, so
`-v` would print zero copies and `-v --dump-raw-sem-ir` would print two
copies. The lack of complaints about this suggests it's not needed.
I'm making a small change to drop newlines between textual and raw
semir. This is an edge case so I don't expect people to really notice in
general, but it seemed unusually aware of what's on a stream, and it
made it harder to do the dump_stream/raw_dump_stream approach, which I
felt would be decent in general, since check is the only phase that can
emit two different things (which I could also just drop -- we don't
really use raw semir anymore, it doesn't seem like a big need to be able
to print it with textual semir, but I'm assuming to just maintain
existing behavior).
In parse, we were previously dumping the tree on verification errors.
I'm removing that because now `--dump-parse-tree` should work fine,
where previously it wouldn't.
I've been mulling this mainly for the parameter complexity of
check/lower, but doing lex/parse for symmetry.
I'm motivated by the plan to move dumping for all of them into the
respective functions, because of discussion about llvm-verifier. That
basically would add another bool parameter (or more) to each of these.
My instinct is we're going to probably accrue a little more over time,
so I'm suggesting this as maybe adding the boundary a little simpler
and/or easier to read.
Note it may make sense to refactor a little further, e.g. maybe
Lower::Context could receive the full set of options and pick out what
it wants, but I figured creating the struct itself would be a decent
start.
I'm trying to put things into options when we can produce a reasonable
default if the user doesn't assign a value. I'm using an explicit
constructor so that values can be added without affecting every caller.
A different factoring would be to pass in everything through the param
struct, but that just felt weird when I was trying it out.
Removing `inst_namer` and `module_name` from `LowerToLLVM` params --
both of these can be inferred from `sem_ir`, and I'm not seeing a
particular reason to maintain them at the call site.
What this really does is avoids shadowing names, so that we can
comfortable have things like `Check::DiagnosticEmitter` or
`Check::DiagnosticLoc` without shadowing being a concern.
Note, down this path I'm also thinking about:
- Renaming misc DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter classes, possibly
just to DiagnosticConsumer/DiagnosticEmitter (so
`Check::DiagnosticEmitter` instead of `SemIRLocDiagnosticEmitter`).
- Dropping `Diagnostic` from `Emitter::DiagnosticBuilder`.
- But not for `Check::DiagnosticBuilder`, because `Check::Builder` would
be ambiguous.
- Renaming diagnostics/diagnostic_* to drop "diagnostic".
[Discussion about SemIRLoc ->
DiagnosticLoc](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1353771570463768698)
reminded me of this (in particular the older [Check::DiagnosticBuilder
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1344363562608627763)),
but I'd only do that rename if there's matching consensus about a path
forward where we keep SemIRLoc, and in a way that it's only ever used
for diagnostics (the divergence from which is at the root of current
LocId discussion).
I'm trying to keep that separate from a namespace addition for clarity.
This is mirroring the structure of codegen/codegen.h, lower/lower.h, and
check/check.h. I recently did lex/lex.h, so parse/parse.h is the last.
Now, the directory's main API file is eponymous with the directory.
I could've used a friend function to avoid making the Tree constructor
public, but in other places we make less use of `friend`, just leaving
things public. This felt more consistent, and simple because it only
affects the constructor.
Jon Ross-Perkins