This turns `Cpp` into a keyword, and makes it map to `NameId::Cpp` and
`PackageNameId::Cpp`.
Per discussion with zygoloid, the keyword versus identifier question is
deliberately kept open by #4846. This PR switches to a keyword because
mapping to a specific `PackageNameId` works best with a special `NameId`
not backed by an `IdentifierId`. We could in theory make it work using
`IdentifierId` or a runtime-tracked `PackageNameId` for `Cpp` (e.g.
stored on `SemIR::File`), but this approach is consistent with `Core`
and so seemed like a good starting point.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
This adds support for importing C++ code directly from source rather
than via a `#include`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Also renames variables of that type to match. A follow-up PR will rename
`Parse::StateStackEntry` to `Parse::State`. This is more consistent with
the naming of similar enums elsewhere in the toolchain, and with the
prevailing practice of using `state` rather than e.g. `entry` as the
name of a `StateStackEntry`.
See also discussion
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/963846118964350976/1326280585592700990)
Building on #5120, make a variant of `AddNode` that returns typed nodes,
and replace `UnsafeMake` uses with it. This switches to templating in
import parsing so that we can get type validation.
With this change, `UnsafeMake` ends up used in three places: `Tree::As`,
`Tree::TryAs`, and `Context::AddNode`. That should mean that all typed
nodes are verified.
This flows out of #5084 and trying to reduce UnsafeMake use. It turns
out imports and namespaces were using unexpected node kinds (previously
ImportIntroducer instead of ImportDecl, for example). This fixes and
adds validation.
I was uncertain about whether to just remove the is_convertible check,
since I don't see it as motivating creation of a conversion between
NodeIdOneOf types. So I've just left a TODO for now.
This doesn't change functionality, but I was seeing better diagnostics
in VS Code.
This also changes the NodeId constructors for related types (also
NodeCategory and NodeIdForKind) to use UnsafeMake for construction. That
originated from avoiding ambiguity coming from `requires`, but the
constructor mode is also one we should typically avoid (e.g., preferring
`Parse::Tree::As`).
Change representation of package names from `IdentifierId` to
`PackageNameId`, and add a special value `PackageNameId::Core` for the
Core package. Add a `Core` expression to name the Core package, and
support for parsing the `Core` keyword in `package` and `import`
declarations.
For now, I've made no changes to instruction fingerprinting or name
mangling. This means that fingerprints and mangled names will collide
between names in the `Core` package and names in a `r#Core` package. See
#4908.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Also makes the style guide explicitly comment on void, but this was the
intent IIRC because it matches Carbon's `-> ()` (and "always" versus
"except for void", which we definitely went back and forth on).
Includes adjusting function pointers, which I definitely forget this
syntax works sometimes.
Excludes utils/tree_sitter/src/scanner.c because it claims to be C, but
really we should probably fix that to be cpp.
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
Disables three new warnings because they lean more towards style
conflicts than fixes. I've brought these up on #style.
Other than that, mostly fixing basic issues, and things that
clang-tidy-20 seems to fire where clang-tiday-16 didn't. One particular
curious case is `llvm::StringLiteral::data()` uses, which are flagged as
not strictly null-terminated; I'm switching to `const char*` in those
spots which matches `llvm::formatv`'s format argument, but feels worse.
I'm removing `run_clang_tidy.py` here because I'm observing it give
fewer warnings than `bazel build --config=clang-tidy -k
//toolchain/...`. The latter matches how we enforce in GitHub actions
(and also caches results, and suppresses output for files that have no
issues), so I'm dropping the bespoke script.
This is in anticipation of making the integer value store be customized
heavily. I'd like to extract it from the common code when doing that, so
first disentangling them here without any intended change in
functionality or behavior to enable that.
I've tried to update `#include`s to be as minimal as I can and added a
few missing includes spotted in the process.
I've split the test for value store to include what was easy focused on
just the value store templates rather than the unified shared value
stores.
This might surface some opportunities for adding more tests, but for
this PR, just doing the minimal restructuring.
This is a primarily automated change:
- Search & replace for capitalization
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s")([A-Z])`
- `$1\L$2`
- Search & replace for period
-
`(CARBON_DIAGNOSTIC\((?:\n\s+)?\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s\w+,(?:\n\s+)?\s"(?:[^)]|\n)+)\.("[,)])`
- `$1$2`
- Limited search & replace for `ERROR: ` -> `error: ` in streamed things
- Leaving a TODO for command_line because there's more cleanup that can
be done there
- Modify diagnostic_consumer.cpp
- ERROR -> error
- WARNING -> warning
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Move subtree sizes over to TreeAndSubtrees, using the different
structure to represent the additional parse work that occurs, as well as
making it clear which functions require the extra information. My intent
is to make it hard to use this by accident.
The subtree size is still tracked during Parse::Tree construction. I
think a lot of that can be cleaned up, although we use it during
placeholder assignment so it may take some work. I wanted to see what
people thought about this before taking action on such a change.
I'm using a 1m line source file generated by #4124 for testing. Command
is `time bazel-bin/toolchain/install/prefix_root/bin/carbon compile
--phase=check --dump-mem-usage ~/tmp/data.carbon`
At head, what I'm seeing is:
```
...
parse_tree_.node_impls_:
used_bytes: 61516116
reserved_bytes: 61516116
...
Total:
used_bytes: 447814230
reserved_bytes: 551663894
...
1.43s user 0.14s system 99% cpu 1.565 total
```
With `Tree::Verify` disabled completely, it looks like:
```
parse_tree_.node_impls_:
used_bytes: 41010744
reserved_bytes: 41010744
...
Total:
used_bytes: 427308858
reserved_bytes: 531158522
...
1.20s user 0.13s system 99% cpu 1.332 total
```
Re-enabling just the basic verification (what is now `Tree::Verify`),
I'm seeing maybe 0.05s slower, but that's within noise for my system. I
do see variability in my timing results, and overall I think this is a
0.2s +/- 0.1s improvement versus the earlier (always testing `Extract`
code) implementation. That's opt; debug builds will be unaffected,
because the same checking occurs as before.
Note, the subtree size is a third of the node representation, which is
why I'm showing the decrease in memory usage here.
Most of these are places where we failed to include a header file and
simply never got an error about this. The fix is to include the header
file.
Most other cases are functions that should have been marked `static` but
were not. Finding all of these was a main motivation for me enabling the
warning despite how much work it is.
One complicating factor was that we weren't including the `handle.h` for
all the state-based handler functions. While this isn't a tiny amount of
code, it is just declarations and doesn't add any extra dependencies. It
also lets us have the checking for which functions need to be `static`
and which don't. For the `parse` library I had to add the `handle.h`
header as well, I tried to match the design of it in `check`.
I have also had to work around a bug in the warning, but given the value
it seems to be providing, that seems reasonable. I've filed the bug
upstream: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94138
I also had to use some hacks to work around limitations of Bazel rules
that wrap `cc_library` rules and don't expose `copts`. I filed a bug for
`cc_proto_library` specifically:
~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/22610~https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/4446
Parse the name of a declaration as a sequence of `NameQualifier`s --
which have a name, possibly parameters, and a trailing period --
followed by a name and possibly parameters. This prepares us for parsing
declarations of members of generic classes and similar cases, but
actually supporting such member redeclarations is left to a future
change.
We previously required functions to have parameters, but no longer do,
following the direction of #3848. Cases like namespaces that can't
actually have parameters are now diagnosed in check instead of in parse.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Change syntax for package declaration to put the `impl` keyword at the
start and remove the `api` keyword.
To support this, rearrange processing of package, library, and import
declarations to use the general modifier handling support in declaration
parsing rather than special-case logic.
There is an ambiguity in `impl package.Foo as Bar`, which we resolve by
treating `package` as an introducer after a modifier only if it's not
followed by `.`.
This provides `export import` logic in lex, parse, and check; `export
name` logic is only in lex and parse, not check.
I think with `export name` I'm going to need to modify import_ref and
some consolidation logic, whereas `export import` seems feasible to keep
as primarily import logic. Given the implementations were looking like
they'd diverge more substantially, I thought it'd be helpful to cut the
PR here.
This is something I noticed working on
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/3884; I think we
have more functions named Diagnose* at present than Emit* or Report*, so
just trying to consolidate. Note a couple Diagnose* functions do a
little more validation, but maybe those should actually be renamed away
(zygoloid had mentioned wanting to generally split out diagnostics to
their own function, and then we'd have it be a more common pattern).
This revamps the support for cross-package imports, making them look
more like a namespace. The planned model is mentioned on
[#toolchain](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1217586076022210670).
This does not implement name lookup into the new namespace structure.
A few key changes in this PR (it's a little sprawling) are:
- Moves logic for adding package imports from context.* to import.*
- Remove SemIR::Import, which was the prior model. This is instead now a
SemIR::Namespace with the NameScope getting a new import_ir_scopes
field.
- Allow SemIR::Namespace to use Parse::ImportDirectiveId in addition to
the prior Parse::NamespaceId
- The import_ir_scopes field includes a NameScopeId so that as we
traverse to child namespaces, we can directly perform name lookup in the
other IR.
- is_closed_import now tracks whether a namespace comes from a different
package. This has a diagnostic implemented in decl_name_stack.
We have `StringLiteral`s in multiple other `Carbon` sub-namespaces.
Rename to a more specific name to avoid collisions.
We should likely also rename `Carbon::IntId` -> `Carbon::IntValueId` and
`Carbon::RealId` -> `Carbon::RealValueId`, but this collision is
prioritized because it was blocking work on typed parse nodes which
introduces a `Carbon::Parse::StringLiteralId`.
This should cover:
```
library "lib" api;
import Foo library default;
import library default;
import library "lib";
```
This splits out `PackageName` and `LibraryName` to their own parse nodes
so that checking can ignore them and still get a balanced parse tree
(otherwise, we essentially need to implement handling of the parse nodes
only to remove the identifiers/string literals -- the optional names
mean we can't blindly do that as before). For reference, these nodes
don't need to be handled because CheckParseTree will need to directly
funnel import information along with checked IRs.
As I was working on this, I noticed `import` and `library` syntax needs
to be fixed for how it imports the current package, and for `Main`
libraries. This mostly reflects the current state in its testing.
Otherwise, this should handle most of the errors I could think of:
dependency cycles, redundant imports, etc.
It does not actually deal with the nuances of cross-IR references.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This detects ordering issues with the `package` and `import` statements.
`library` is changed from package-specific to instead be generic between
the two, since structurally it's non-specific.
The next step would be to start exposing the results for the driver to
make ordering decisions for checking. That'll involve further
modifications to this code, but this felt like a reasonable change point
because it's the extent of the parser enforcement, and still causes
significant refactoring.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
Jon Ross-PerkinsandDana Jansens
Richard SmithandJon Ross-Perkins
Geoff Romer
Chandler Carruth
David Blaikie
josh11bandJon Ross-Perkins