For now, hide `override fn`s from name lookup, so that the base class
version is always used, as the derived-class version does not have its
own vptr entry and so would not do the right thing if a further-derived
class adds a new override. This is implemented via a new access kind of
`Hidden`.
When checking the overriding function, pass in the expected `Self` type
and check the `self` parameter against that; the signature that we
generate for the thunk in the derived class is the base class signature
with the `self` parameter's type changed to the derived class.
When we generate a thunk for a virtual function, the thunk is assigned a
`virtual_index`, and the virtual function itself is not. When the thunk
makes a direct call to the virtual function, recognize this situation by
checking for a `virtual_index`, and perform a non-virtual call if there
isn't one.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
Instead of allowing lower to pick whatever type layout it desires,
compute the layouts of types as part of completing the type, and make
lower build types that match that representation.
For now we assume that all pointers are 64-bit, since we don't have
access to target information. We allow tail padding reuse for structs
and tuple types (and by extension, for classes, since they use structs
as their object representation), but not for arrays.
In order to build matching LLVM types, we create LLVM packed structs
where necessary, and we insert inter-field padding on the end of the
previous field so that GEP indexes still always match Carbon's
ElementIndexes.
We don't yet use the computed alignment much in LLVM IR generation -- in
particular, `alloca`s, `load`s, and `store`s should probably use the
computed type alignment, but don't.
Assisted-by: Gemini via Antigravity
When a function call appears in a generic, and calls another generic
that has a concrete type in its call-site signature, that concrete type
will be completed only in the file that contains the call. The generic
containing the call won't require completeness to be checked again when
forming a specific call, because the type was concrete. This means that
when lowering the call instruction, there is no single file that is
guaranteed to contain complete types for all of the callee's parameters
-- the file containing the specific callee won't necessarily have
completed the concrete parts of the signature, and the files containing
the definition and call won't necessarily have completed the symbolic
parts of the signature.
To handle this, look at both versions of the function when building its
lowered signature -- the version that we saw when forming the `call`
instruction and the version corresponding to the concrete, specific
callee, and combine information from both to form the LLVM function
type.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Assert cleanly if we try to emit a definition or a call of a function
whose signature we were not able to emit exactly. This should make such
issues a lot easier to debug, as we were previously failing in quite
mysterious ways in this case.
When a `var` is not explicitly given an initializer, initialize it in
one of two ways:
* If its type implements the new interface `Core.Default`, call
`Core.Default.Op` to initialize it.
* Otherwise, if its type implements `UnformedInit`, leave it in an
unformed state. For now, this is always an uninitialized state, but that
will change in the future.
* If neither of those apply, the `var` declaration is ill-formed.
This is a step towards implementing leads decision #6739 and proposals
#257 and #5913.
Assisted-by: Gemini 3.1 Pro via Antigravity
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This is a step toward removing the index from `InitForm`, so that equal
form values always have equal representations.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
Add a new builtin function `cpp.std.initializer_list.make` that takes an
array and returns a `std::initializer_list`, initialized to refer to
that array. When C++ initialization wants to perform a
`std::initializer_list`-from-array construction, synthesize a
declaration of a matching builtin function and use that to perform the
initialization.
Ideally we would specify this conversion as an impl of `ImplicitAs` in
the prelude instead of hardcoding it in the interop layer, but
unfortunately that's not currently possible, for various reasons -- we
can't make the conversion form-generic, we can't deduce the array length
from the initializer, and we can't deduce against the arguments of
imported C++ class templates yet -- so for now synthesizing a builtin
function on demand is the best we can do.
Assisted-by: Gemini 3 Pro via Antigravity
This pull request adds support for integer-to-char conversion, allowing
the compiler to correctly handle character casting, implementing part of
the issue #5922.
```carbon
import Core library "io";
fn Run() -> i32 {
var i : i32 = 65;
var ch: char = (i as char); // Support implemented!
Core.PrintChar(ch); // Print 'A'
return 0;
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
Support an implicit conversion from `T*` to `Cpp.void*` and to `const
Cpp.void*`, and an `unsafe as` conversion in the opposite direction.
In order to support C++ calls taking and returning `void*` (which get
mapped to Carbon `Optional(Cpp.void*)`, also support conversions from
`Optional(T)` to `Optional(U)` if there's a conversion from `T` to `U`.
Fix a bug in `OptionalStorage` for `T*` where its `HasValue` was exactly
backwards.
Pursuant to recent decisions on #6124, switch `Destroy` to use a
`CustomWitness` for its implementation. Right now this is manufacturing
no-op implementation functions on each lookup, which obviously isn't
ideal but is intended as a first pass. I'm mostly trying to find the
right balance between updating the approach to reflect new decisions,
while still breaking apart work in a way.
The `CoreInterface` logic is intended to build on `CoreIdentifier`
support. We have a number of additional interfaces that require
specialized logic, and that'll extend pretty far with C++ interop, so it
seemed easiest to have a generic function for it. That's what's
replacing the logic inside C++ interop that was doing string comparisons
(which could have already been moved to `CoreIdentifier`, I just missed
it in my first pass).
This adds `CustomWitness` support because the `Destroy` witnesses can be
imported cross-file. `CustomWitness` was previously only used for C++
types, which don't yet support import, which is why that wasn't
previously an issue. The addition of `query_specific_interface_id` is
similarly needed in order to get correct sorting of witness blocks when
imported.
This PR also removes builtin constraint logic (note this is in a
separate commit to help review; it's not a separate PR because it's
difficult to split apart without tests breaking). This had been made
generic with the expectation that destroy, copy, move, and conversions
would all need related support. Under the new decision, we are not going
to do blanket impls and will instead just manufacture a `CustomWitness`
for everything.
A lot of SemIR fingerprints change, but that's probably because the
addition of `Destroy` on core classes is yielding structural changes.
If the value representation of `T` is a copy representation, but it
copies all of the bits of `T`'s object representation, then it's OK to
use that as the value representation of `MaybeUnformed(T)` too.
This fixes the behavior of interop with nullable pointers, which are
represented as an adapter of `MaybeUnformed(T*)`, and need to be passed
to and returned from functions on the Carbon / C++ boundary as `T*`s.
In preparation for modeling `Optional(T*)` as a null pointer value.
With this PR, pointers remain non-nullable, but `MaybeUnformed(T*)` has
a particular unformed state that has the same representation as a C++
null pointer, which is accessible and detectable via builtins.
This also does a little restructuring in the same direction, following
#6124.
Leads want `Destroy` to work similarly now for all types. As a
consequence, there doesn't seem to be as much benefit to splitting off
aggregate destruction. In this PR, the `type.destroy` function can now
be expected to destroy anything that's destructible; that means it'll be
usable for the `final fn` once that support is available.
Similarly, this gets rid of the impls other than the single blanket
impl, now using `type.can_destroy`. Since they all need to use the same
function, there's no benefit to splitting approaches. Also, now it can
just be a `final impl` since there should be no need for people to
create specializations -- if this blanket impl applies, it means the
`final fn` is the same.
This also slips in `partial` support since there's no reason to have it
diverge anymore. Also `abstract`, which I'm not sure is broadly testable
since most cases it'd come up, the `abstract` keyword is explicitly
detected/rejected.
Note though that this doesn't make any really big changes. It's just
realigning on the leads decision. I'm going this way to try to reduce
name-related churn for other changes.
This is Itanium-specific for now (explicitly downcasting to the itanium
vtable handling code in Clang) - though it doesn't look like it'd be a
big stretch to either have conditional/two codepaths down Itanium and
MSVC in Carbon, or maybe add a virtual function in clang to avoid
needing to conditional+downcast in Carbon.
Here's a working example:
`dynamic_type.h`:
```
#ifndef TEST_H
#define TEST_H
struct A {
virtual auto virt0() -> int;
virtual auto virt1() -> int;
};
auto GetVal() -> A* _Nonnull;
#endif
```
`test.carbon`:
```
library "test";
import Cpp library "dynamic_type.h";
import Core library "io";
fn Run() {
var a: Cpp.A* = Cpp.GetVal();
Core.Print(a->virt0());
Core.Print(a->virt1());
}
```
`dynamic_type.cpp`:
```
#include "dynamic_type.h"
auto A::virt0() -> int {
return 0;
}
auto A::virt1() -> int {
return 1;
}
struct B: A {
auto virt0() -> int override {
return 7;
}
auto virt1() -> int override {
return 42;
}
};
auto GetVal() -> A* _Nonnull {
static B b;
return &b;
}
```
```
$ ./bazel-bin/toolchain/carbon compile test.carbon
$ clang++-tot -g dynamic_type.cpp test.o --output=a.out
$ ./a.out
7
42
```
(linking with `carbon link` failed because we aren't linking to the C++
runtime yet, it seems, so: `ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__class_type_info`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
Add `Dependent` value and initializing representations for types whose
representations are unknown because they are dependent. When generating
SemIR in such cases, use a worst-case initializing representation that
both provides a destination address and also propagates a potential
result value.
Use this to fix incorrect lowering and lowering crashes for specific
functions involving generic types that don't use a copy value
representation.
In lowering, be careful to distinguish between whether the initializing
representation for the generic return type uses a return slot (which
affects whether the SemIR declaration and call have one) and whether the
initializing representation for the specific return type uses a return
slot (which affects whether the LLVM IR declaration and call have one).
This is in support of a goal of changing the blanket `destroy` impl to
use (roughly):
```
private fn CanAggregateDestroy() -> type = "type.can_aggregate_destroy";
// Handles aggregate type destruction.
impl forall [AggregateDestroyT:! CanAggregateDestroy()] AggregateDestroyT as Destroy {
fn Op[addr self: Self*]() = "type.aggregate_destroy";
}
```
That isn't done here because there's still other issues that migrating
raises. What this *does* do is add the builtin functions, and in
particular, support to `FacetTypeInfo` to make `CanAggregateDestroy`
work.
The "special requirement" approach in `FacetTypeInfo` allows us to
support restricting a blanket impl under the current approach of impls.
Maybe we'll find a cleaner approach that can work in the future, but
this fits into the current model by propagating similar to other
requirements. I'm using an enum mask because we have a number of similar
things to add (e.g. copy, move) but I'm not sure we need a full vector.
A few alternatives considered were:
- Supporting syntax more like `where .Self impls
TypeCanAggregateDestroy(.Self, SupportedInterface,
UnsupportedInterface)`. I think it'd be a little cleaner, but requires
better compile-time evaluation in order to assess the type of the call.
Right now it's expected to be a `FacetType` too early to make this work,
and I was concerned about pouring too much more time down this route.
- Providing an actual interface, in particular doing name lookup back
into `Core.` for an interface. This would've added name lookup overhead,
and the question of whether an `impl` exists.
- Generating an interface. This avoids the name lookup, but would still
raise the question of whether an `impl` should also be generated. Work
I've previously done generating interfaces for class destruction also
feels complex to both write and understand (an unfortunate issue).
- Still modeling as an `ImplsConstraint`, for example by defining a
special `InterfaceId::CanAggregateDestroy = -2` similar to what we do on
other ids. I was hesitant because of how this expands the number of
modes of `InterfaceId`, and things for consuming code to watch out for,
for what feels like a relatively niche set of use-cases that are only
interface-like.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dana Jansens <danakj@orodu.net>
Instead of hardcoding which types are copyable, add a `Core.Copy`
interface to perform copying. Move almost all the current copy support
to that interface. Some remaining pieces are still using builtin logic
after this PR:
* For tuples and structs, builtin logic is used to perform elementwise
copies. This also supports copying *adapters of* tuples and structs,
which seems like it may not be desirable, especially for non-extending
adapters. A `Copy` impl is provided for tuples of at most 2 elements, so
that `Core.Copy` constraints are satisfied, but we can't implement this
generally until we have variadics support, and don't yet have a
mechanism to generalize this to structs.
* For `enum` types imported from C++, builtin logic is used to perform a
copy. This is temporary until we have a mechanism to identify these
types from an impl in the prelude.
One lowering test in `toolchain/lower/testdata/class/generic.carbon` is
disabled for now, as it causes a crash in the lowering code due to an
ABI mismatch between the call signature in the lowered declaration of a
specific function and the call that is generated in the specific callee.
Fixing this is a little involved, and will be done in a separate PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This type has the same object representation as `T`, but always uses a
pointer type as its value representation. No other semantics are
provided for it yet.
Add missing builtins for float compound assignment, for building a
FloatType, and for converting a float literal to FloatType. Switch
`Core.Float` to being a class and add impls for the various
floating-point operators.
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carbon Infra Bot <carbon-external-infra@google.com>
toolchain/check/testdata/builtins/char/basics.carbon and
toolchain/lower/testdata/builtins/char.carbon are probably the most
interesting tests here. The parse tests is required because this adds a
new node kind, and we need coverage of it; but the attached info is
minor. There's a fair amount of test churn here because I'm adding the
Core.Char and Core.CharLiteral types as new singletons.
My intent here is that `CharId` is always a unicode code point, even
when the type is a `Char` and thus must be a single UTF-8 code unit
(single byte). This mainly means the stored value of a `CharValue` can
be printed internally without knowing the type.
---------
Co-authored-by: josh11b <15258583+josh11b@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This changes `Destroy` to use an interface for its implementation.
Note that this change includes a lot of test updates. Even when
`Destroy` is a no-op, it still causes code generation as part of
determining that.
Originally I was trying to use ranges to cut down the scope of this, and
to a degree I think they have. But a flipside here is that cases where
no destructors should be generated -- particularly globals -- would be
needed to completely remove destructor calls. Even for ranges, the range
can often include the destructor placement. So I've shifted
frame-of-thought a little: accept a bunch of destructor churn, because
destructors are needed and will be prevalent. The verbosity is a feature
of the design to make desugaring apparent in IR, not a bug.
Update remaining parts of lowering, in particular the lowering of
aggregates, to handle lowering within a specific from a different file
than its generic. Look up information about a type in the current
specific and in its file rather than performing lookups for the type in
the generic and its file.
Remove or fix all remaining uses of raw `TypeId` in
lower/function_context and lower/handle*, so that the type from the
specific is consistently always used when lowering a specific function.
---------
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
This preserves the constant values of the arguments to the thunk, which
is important if the thunk requires conversion of an `IntLiteral` to some
other type. This should become unnecessary once we have form support,
but avoiding the indirection through a thunk function seems valuable
even once that support is in place.
To support this, track whether a function is a thunk on the Function
object, and if so, what the callee of the thunk is. This information is
also included in formatted SemIR when dumping the thunk.
When lowering a specific function whose generic was defined in a
different file, switch to that other file's `FileContext` and lower the
generic there. Also pass the `FileContext` corresponding to the specific
into the `FunctionContext`, and use that `FileContext` for resolving
requests for constants and types from the specific.
Provide builtins for compound assignments instead of defining them in
the prelude as a use of a binary operator and an assignment. This allows
us to lower compound assignment directly to LLVM operations instead of
producing a function call. In the short term this also allows us to
define a type-generic compound assignment in the prelude.
Adds a `virtual_index` to `SemIR::Function` used to determine which
vtable slot
to use when calling the given function.
Then use that to lower the function call to use the vtable and
specifically the
relative vtable ABI to match the vtable entries.
This is part of a broader plan to have noop destructor functions for
trivial destruction.
Note this emits a SemIR call (`%no_op: init %empty_tuple.type = call
%NoOp.ref() [concrete = constants.%empty_tuple]`), but not LLVM IR. My
thought was this was probably okay, since even though it'll be a little
spammy with destructor calls, the flipside is there'll probably already
be a fair amount for the name reference, and this at least shows when
the call is injected (and discarded).
---------
Co-authored-by: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Reduce usage of `GetConstantInSpecific` to a single caller in constant
evaluation, with a TODO to remove that.
This gets us closer to being able to fully perform type-checking against
abstract types instead of types anchored within a particular generic.
Resolve instruction id depending on the context from which a function is
called.
Calling a function in a function context that does not have a definition
emitted before reaching lowering will cause a crash. This needs a change
in check/eval layer.
Doing so results in TODOs in the resulting semir, since we don't handle
combining the facet types together properly or doing lookup into them.
There's a test added demonstrating this, which will be made to work in
followups.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jon Ross-Perkins <jperkins@google.com>
High level, replacing `Id::Invalid` with `Id::None` and `Id::is_valid`
with `Id::has_value` for clarity, as discussed
[here](https://discord.com/channels/655572317891461132/655578254970716160/1331664574545395794).
The `IntId` refactoring is needed together with `AnyIdBase` because it's
also used with `ValueStore`.
Note, trying to be careful not to rewrite `EnumBase::InvalidIndex`, or
`is_valid` in general (e.g., `IdKind::is_valid`).
I've tried to sequence commits here:
1. Automatic replacements:
- `((?:Id|Index)(?: |::|\(|Base(?:\(|::)))Invalid((?:Index)?\W)` ->
`$1None$2`
- `<invalid>` -> `<none>`
- `InvalidNodeId` -> `NoneNodeId`
- `/\*invalid\*/` -> `/*none*/`
- `id((?:_|\(\))(?:\.|->))is_valid` -> `id$1has_value`
2. Manual edits:
- In `int.h` and `int_test.cpp`
- `IntT` has `is_value`, which I'm renaming to `is_embedded_value`.
- Manual edits to comments in this file.
- `AnyIdBase` and `IdBase`
- Declaration of `is_valid` -> `has_value`, `InvalidIndex` ->
`NoneIndex`.
- In `ids.h` and `ids.cpp`
- `is_valid` -> `has_value`
- `// An explicitly invalid ID.` -> `// An ID with no value.`; similar
for index
- Various math on `InvalidIndex` -> `NoneIndex`
- Various mentions of "valid" in comments
- In `value_store.h`, for `IdT::Invalid`, plus one comment
- In `impl.h` and `tokenized_buffer.h`, we had different initialization
of `::None` values (versus `ids.h` syntax) that I fixed manually.
- Spot checks to compile
- Particularly where `is_valid` replacements didn't catch spots due to
different naming.
3. Autoupdate tests
4. verbose.carbon (NOAUTOUPDATE)
5. Comment spot checks
Note there are probably other mentions of "Invalid" that should be swept
up, but I'd like to argue for merging and separating out remaining
cleanup since this is so sweeping (and likely to hit merge conflicts
from churn). We'll probably have lingering mentions of "invalid" for a
bit regardless, just because there are uses of "invalid" in non-Id APIs.
Add a builtin `"int.convert"` supporting unchecked conversions between
different integer types. This performs a truncation, zero-extension, or
sign-extension, depending on the widths of the operands and the
signedness of the source type. Add explicit `As` support to the prelude.
No implicit conversions are supported yet as we don't have a way to
express the constraint that we can only implicitly convert to wider
types.
Fixes integer builtins to produce the correct values (and not
CHECK-fail) when used on integer literals. Also adds impls to the
prelude to use the new builtins to perform operations on integer
literals.
Perhaps most importantly, this allows directly initializing `i32` values
with negative numbers, as the negation operation on integer literals now
works.
For testing I've added tests for use of literals with one operator in
each class (addition, multiplication, ordering, bitwise, etc) for which
there are distinct rules or overflow behavior, rather than exhaustively
testing all the combinations. This is aimed at finding a good tradeoff
between maintainability of the tests and thorough test coverage.
Also fixes lowering of heterogeneous shifts and comparisons. These are
currently disabled when one of the operands is an integer literal, but
we may want to allow that when the integer literal operand has a known
constant value.
Richard Smith
Ammar AlassalandDana Jansens
David BlaikieandDana Jansens
Alina Sbirlea
Boaz Brickner
Thomas Köppe
